CPSC NEISS · code 1208

Croquet (activity, Apparel Or Equipment)

Croquet (activity, Apparel Or Equipment): danger rank #762 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #678 of 838 (260 estimated ER visits a year; declining by about 43% over the last five years).

Sports & Recreation Equipment CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Croquet (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) ranks #762 of 838 by danger score (26/100) at ER-volume #678 of 838 (260/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#762
danger rank of 838
#678
ER-volume rank of 838
26/100
danger score
260/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (26/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

26 Among the lowest lower than 91% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 19/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

A
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 3 25th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 260 16th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -43% 10th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 1 18th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 5,209 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1208. Segments sum to 5,209 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Sports & Recreation Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Sports & Recreation Equipment danger scores

1. Golf (activity, Apparel O…49/1002. Scuba Diving (activity, A…48/1003. Golf Carts, Motorized Veh…48/1004. Swimming Pools, Not Speci…46/1005. Horseback Riding (activit…46/1006. Snowmobiles (activity, Ap…45/1007. Trampolines43/1008. Croquet (activity, Appare…26/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10026/100
PlainSafety danger score · Croquet (activity, Apparel Or Equipment)

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 26/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for croquet (activity, apparel or equipment) - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 260 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.0% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-43%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for croquet (activity, apparel or equipment) are declining by about 43% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2008 (787 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2022 (65 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 1,150 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by internal injury to the head (611 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 2,555 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.0% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 1 consumer incident report filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how croquet (activity, apparel or equipment) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

02004006008001K 20052008201120142017202020232024 174
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Croquet (activity, Apparel Or Equipment), CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 646 122 768
5-14 1,442 1,113 2,555
15-24 470 206 676
25-34 300 16 316
35-44 168 231 399
45-54 31 15 46
55-64 87 15 102
65-74 45 0 45
75+ 190 112 302

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Face Laceration 1,150
Head Internal Injury 611
Mouth Laceration 344
Face Contusions, Abr. 293
Head Laceration 281
Wrist Contusions, Abr. 231
Ankle Strain, Sprain 197
Head Contusions, Abr. 195
Ankle Contusions, Abr. 174
Face Fracture 168
Hand Contusions, Abr. 164
Finger Contusions, Abr. 150
Upper Trunk Contusions, Abr. 132
Mouth Dental Injury 89
Finger Strain, Sprain 87

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 97.1% (5,057)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 2.8% (147)
Held For Observation 0.1% (5)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 11 · Female · Wrist · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

11 YOF HERE FOR RIGHT WRIST PAIN, SHE IS RIGHT HAND DOMINANT. 1 DAY PTA HER SISTER HIT HER IN THE WRIST WITH A WOODEN CROQUET STAKE. DX: CONTUSION OF RIGHT WRIST

Age 84 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

84YOM STATES THAT HE WAS PLAYING CROQUET WITH HIS WIFE TODAY WHEN HE HAD A FALL BACKWARD STRIKING HIS HEAD DX: CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE

Age 9 · Male · Head · Laceration · 2024

9YOM- PT WAS HIT TO THE FOREHEAD WITH A CROQUET MALLET PT PLAYING WITH 5 YOLD CHILD THAT ACCIDENTALLY HIT PT. DX: SCALP LACERATION.

Age 4 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

4YOM WAS OUTSIDE WHILE BROTHER WAS SWINGING WOODEN CROQUET MALLETS AND HIT PT IN THE HEAD DX: HEAD TRAUMA, LACERATION OF HEAD

Age 9 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2023

9YOF C/O FOREHEAD LACERATION THAT OCCURRED PTA. THE PT WAS PLAYING CROQUET WITH HER BROTHER & HE ACCIDENTALLY HIT HER IN THE FOREHEAD WITH THE WOODEN MALLET. DX: HEAD TRAUMA;FOREHEAD LACERATION

Age 2 · Female · Mouth · Laceration · 2023

2 YOF WAS PLAYING WITH A SMALL CROQUET MALLET WHEN THE HANDLE WENT INSIDE OF HER MOUTH. DX: LACERATION OF ORAL CAVITY

Age 34 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2023

34 YOM REPORTS WAS PLAYING CROQUET, GOT LIGHTHEADED AND FELL, DENIES ANY LOC, STRUCK BACK OF HEAD, REPORTS DIZZINESS AND WOOZY SINCE. HISTORY OF EWING'S SARCOMA. DX: LIGHT HEADED

Age 10 · Female · Finger · Contusions, Abr. · 2022

10YOF PT PLAYING CROQUET GOT STRUCK IN LT MIDDLE FINGER BY THE BALL PAINFUL DX CONTUSION LT MIDDLE FINGER

Age 85 · Male · Finger · Avulsion · 2021

85YOM WAS USING A RUBBER MALLOT AND ACCIDENTALY HIT HIS THUMB. DX TRAUMATIC AVULSION OF NAIL OF FINGER

Age 18 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2021

18YOM PLAYING CROQUET,STRUCK BY ANOTHER PLAYER IN FACE--DX:LAC EYEBROW

Age 4 · Male · Head · Laceration · 2021

4YOM WAS AT A BIRTHDAY PARTY AND WAS ACCIDENTALLY HIT IN THE HEAD W/ A WOODEN CROQUET MALLET BY ANOTHER CHILD. DX: SCALP LAC

Age 3 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2021

3YOM WAS PLAYING ON A GOLF COURSE WHEN HE TRIPPED OVER A CROQUET STAKE AND FELL HITTING HIS FOREHEAD ON A LOW BRICK FENCE. DX: FOREHEAD LACERATION.

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/6/2014 · Incident, No Injury · Wild Sales, LLC DBA Wild Sports · Iowa

I set up the croquet set by Wild Sports. The carry bag that it comes with requires all the mallets to be put together EACH time by screwing the wooden mallet head onto the wooden stick. Since the threads are wooden, it is very difficult to tighten all 6 mallets. The 2 kids were playing croquet and one of them hit the ball and the wooden mallet head came flying out into the air about 4 feet high and landed by my other child. Fearing that more mallet heads might come off, I tried to tighten them more. Again, another wooden mallet head came flying off endangering 2 children and myself. I immediately took the mallets away and ended the game. I contacted the company, Wild Sports, via phone and told the customer service rep what happened. I said the only way to secure the heads is to glue them on but then they wouldn't fit in the supplied bag. The supplied "carry bag" only fits completely disassembled pieces. She offered another, bigger bag. I agreed, told her I would glue them if there was a bigger bag and emailed her my address per her request. In a return response she then told me that I would have to pay for the bigger bag to hold the pieces. I told her no, that the game, as it must be completely assembled for every play, is unsafe and the company should try to remedy it. There was no return response. The "assembly, directions, and rules" paper that came with the croquet set did NOT have any assembly directions, nor does it state that assembly is required. The paper only has rules of play on it. Wild Sports www.wildsports.com Style # YTCQS5-1 317-804-9160 customerservice@wildsports.com This product was bought at Menards in Iowa and Menards will not return it.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to croquet (activity, apparel or equipment) on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Sports & Recreation Equipment

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Croquet (activity, Apparel Or Equipment): cross-group products nearest on danger score (26/100), estimated annual ER visits (260/yr), and hospitalization share (3.0%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Croquet (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) ranks #762 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #678 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does croquet (activity, apparel or equipment) rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, croquet (activity, apparel or equipment) ranks #762 by PlainSafety danger score (26/100) and #678 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (260/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from croquet (activity, apparel or equipment)?

The most common injury is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 1,150 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from croquet (activity, apparel or equipment) increasing or decreasing?

Down 43% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for croquet (activity, apparel or equipment) injuries?

The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 2,555 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by croquet (activity, apparel or equipment)?

Of all ER visits involving croquet (activity, apparel or equipment), approximately 3.0% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.0%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with croquet (activity, apparel or equipment)?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Croquet (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.