CPSC NEISS · code 1560

Baby Slings And Wraps

Baby Slings And Wraps: danger rank #419 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #765 of 838 (269 estimated ER visits a year; rising by about 529% over the last five years).

Nursery & Baby Products CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2019-2024, Baby Slings And Wraps ranks #419 of 838 by danger score (35/100) at ER-volume #765 of 838 (269/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#419
danger rank of 838
#765
ER-volume rank of 838
35/100
danger score
269/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (35/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

35 Lower than most lower than 50% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 44/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 5 45th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 269 17th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +529% 100th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 8 43rd 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 1,617 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1560. Segments sum to 1,617 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Nursery & Baby Products group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Nursery & Baby Products danger scores

1. Bassinets Or Cradles47/1002. Baby Bathtub Seats Or Rin…41/1003. Baby Baths Or Bathinettes41/1004. Cribs, Nonportable Or Not…40/1005. High Chairs39/1006. Portable Baby Swings (for…38/1007. Portable Cribs38/1008. Baby Slings And Wraps35/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10035/100
PlainSafety danger score · Baby Slings And Wraps

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 35/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for baby slings and wraps - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 269 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 5.2% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend+529%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 6-year NEISS window from 2019 to 2024, injury counts for baby slings and wraps are rising by about 529% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (492 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2022 (181 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 635 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by other to the not stated/unk (326 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 1,432 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 5.2% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 8 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how baby slings and wraps fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2019–2024)

100200300400500600 201920202021202220232024 492
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Baby Slings And Wraps, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 349 1,083 1,432
15-24 0 16 16
25-34 0 163 163

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Head Internal Injury 635
Not Stated/unk Other 326
Elbow Contusions, Abr. 108
Head Contusions, Abr. 108
Face Laceration 71
Head Hematoma 63
Lower Leg Other 57
Finger Other 55
Upper Trunk Other 55
Head Fracture 41
Head Concussion 16
Lower Trunk Strain, Sprain 16
Upper Leg Fracture 16
All Parts Body Anoxia 8
Elbow Dislocation 8

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 93.4% (1,511)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 3.4% (55)
Treated And Transferred 3.2% (51)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 30 · Female · Elbow · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

30 YOF INJURED ELBOWS, HIT BY CAR WHILE CROSSING STREET, FALL, HOLING DAUGHTER IN BABY CARRIER. DX-MVC VS PEDESTRIAN, ABRASIONO BILATERAL ELBOWS

Age 202 · Female · Not Stated/unk · Other · 2024

2 MOF INVOLVED IN MVC VS PEDESTRIAN, IN BABY CARRIER, IN MOTHER'S ARMS, HIT BY CAR IN TNERSECTION, FALL. DX- FALL,NO INJURY

Age 201 · Female · Not Stated/unk · Other · 2024

1 MOF PARENTS TRYING TO SECURE PT IN CLOTH WRAP, FELL THROUGH WRAP ONTO FLOOR DX FALL NO INJURY

Age 204 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

4MOM PRESENTING AFTER TRAUMA TO HEAD AFTER A MVA. PATIENT WAS IN A BABY WRAP FACING MOM ON A BUS WHEN THE BUS HIT A CAR AND BACK OF BABY'S HEAD HIT THE SEAT IN FRONT OF HIM. DX; INJURY OF HEAD, ENCOUNTER FOR MED SCREENING EXAM

Age 201 · Female · Head · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

5WOF TO ER W/ PARENTS AFTER BABY FELL FROM ABABY SLING THAT FATHER WAS WEARING & IT CAME UNDONE & PT FELL HITTING HER HEAD, PT FELL FROM APROX 4.5 FT HIGH, PT CRIED IMEDIATLY AFTER IMPACT ON CEMENT FLOOR WHILE OUTSIDE W/ PARENTS, PT HAS CONTUSION OF SCALP, DX FALL, TRAUMATIC HEAD INJURY OF HEAD, CONTUSION OF SCALP

Age 206 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

6MOM WAS IN A BABY SLING ATTACHED TO DAD WHILE HE WAS WALKING IN THE PARK, CHILD FELL OUT OF THE SLING STRIKING HEAD DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY

Age 209 · Male · Head · Concussion · 2024

9MOM WAS AT HOME YESTERDAY WHEN HE FELL. MOM WAS TRYING TO PLACE HIM IN A BABY SLING ON HER BACK WHEN PT SLIPPED OUT OF HER HANDS AND FELL, LANDING ON HIS HEAD. REPORTS HE PASSED OUT FOR APPROXIMATELY 2MINS, SHE PAT HIM ON THE BACK UNTIL HE WOKE UP. DX: CONCUSSION

Age 208 · Female · Upper Leg · Fracture · 2024

8MOF WAS BEING PUT INTO A BACKPACK BUT FELL FORWARD AND OUT OF IT HITTING THE GROUND DX: CLOSED LT FEMORAL FRACTURE

Age 201 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

1MOF - PT IN A CARRIER ON MOM AND FELL OUT, HIT HEAD ON CONCRETE. DX: HEAD INJURY

Age 203 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

3MOM BEING CARRIED IN A WEARABLE BABY CARRIER SLING AND MOM CLOSED CAR TRUNK AND HIT PATIENT IN HEAD WITH TRUNK DOOR DX: CHI

Age 204 · Male · Head · Fracture · 2024

4 MOM PRESENTS WITH SKULL FRACTURE AND HEAD INJURY S/P WAS CARRIED IN A BABY SLING ON MOTHER AND MOM FELL DOWN A STEP AND PATIENT CAME OUT OF THE SLING AND LANDED ON CONCRETE. DX: SKULL FRACTURE; HEAD INJURY

Age 204 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

4MOF WAS BEING CARRIED BY MOTHER IN A WEARABLE CARRIER WHEN MOTHER FELL TO THE GROUND DX: CHI *

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/4/2024 · No Incident, No Injury · Blooming Babies, LLC · Massachusetts

I ordered baby/toddler slings from https://bloomingbabies.co/ I saw in an Ad on [REDACTED]. They are totally unsafe to be holding babies, the second you add any weight to the sling, the straps slip out of the buckles! All pictures of the product dont show any straps.

9/17/2024 · No Incident, No Injury · Shiaon · Ohio

My parents purchased a Shiaon baby sling mesh carrier to carry my month old child. I tried to do my due diligence to make sure it is safe, and believe it does not comply with cpsc requirements for soft or sling infant carriers. For one thing, it has no safety label or instructions attached to the carrier itself. I have asked them not to use this carrier with my child, since there is no indication that the company has complied with minimum safety standards. As far as I can tell, this link shows the same carrier they showed me https://www.amazon.com/Shiaon-Carrier-Shoulder-Lightweight-Carrying/dp/B0B6Z9SVXG

9/15/2019 · No Incident, No Injury · Baby K'tan, LLC · Texas

I am concerned about the sale of front facing baby swaddlers. This is very dangerous and could cause smothering or accidental injury. I witnessed a woman in the grocery store shopping wearing this and reaching for products while her baby was in the front facing swaddler!

7/27/2022 · No Incident, No Injury · Bird & Cronin · United States

An unsafe sleep positioner encouraging sleep on side and stomach. Researched product after talking to a customer and reading the instruction manual.

7/21/2025 · Incident, No Injury · Babybliss US · United States

There is an [REDACTED] ad circulating for the The DreamNest (Ultimate Baby Bed) that is promoted for overnight sleep and uses the words secure attachment so your baby wont suffocate. They are lucky they have no reported deaths from this product but this is grossly misleading and I think this language needs to be changed immediately.

10/23/2023 · Incident, No Injury · ERGObaby · United States

In the forward facing position, my grandson, who is the appropriate height for forward facing according to the specifications of this carrier, was almost strangled as the cloth sat too high under his neck, and it was cutting off his airway. It took no time at all (seconds!) and thankfully we noticed in time. This product should not be used in a forward facing capacity.

1/24/2023 · Death · Solly Baby LLC · Pennsylvania

On 1/21/23 around 1pm, the entire family walked to the playground with infant in a Solly Baby wrap that was carried by mother. Infant was fussy on the walk over, so mother decided to return home alone with infant. At some point during the walk back, infant stopped fussing and mother assumed he had fallen asleep. When mother arrived home and took infant out of the wrap, she discovered he was limp and unresponsive. 911 was called, and medics transported infant to hospital where he was pronounced.

1/12/2021 · Incident, No Injury · lillebaby · Virginia

Caller is reporting that the plastic piece that held the strap together on the infant carrier snapped while she was carrying her 7 month old child. Fortunately she was able to hold the child or this could have caused severe injuries. The manufacturer was contacted and they requested information which she tried to provide to them, however, the company has not provided a replacement although the product was registered and it is a safety issue. Caller is concerned that this infant carrier is a safety hazard and should be reported.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to baby slings and wraps on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Nursery & Baby Products

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Baby Slings And Wraps: cross-group products nearest on danger score (35/100), estimated annual ER visits (269/yr), and hospitalization share (5.2%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Baby Slings And Wraps ranks #419 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #765 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does baby slings and wraps rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, baby slings and wraps ranks #419 by PlainSafety danger score (35/100) and #765 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (269/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from baby slings and wraps?

The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 635 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from baby slings and wraps increasing or decreasing?

Up 529% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for baby slings and wraps injuries?

The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 1,432 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by baby slings and wraps?

Of all ER visits involving baby slings and wraps, approximately 5.2% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (94.8%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with baby slings and wraps?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Baby Slings And Wraps is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.