CPSC NEISS · code 545

Amateur Two-way Radios

Amateur Two-way Radios: danger rank #794 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #743 of 838 (129 estimated ER visits a year; declining by about 37% over the last five years).

Home Structures & Construction Materials CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Amateur Two-way Radios ranks #794 of 838 by danger score (24/100) at ER-volume #743 of 838 (129/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#794
danger rank of 838
#743
ER-volume rank of 838
24/100
danger score
129/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (24/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

24 Among the lowest lower than 95% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 25/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

B
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 3 28th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 129 10th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -37% 14th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 13 52nd 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 2,447 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 545. Segments sum to 2,447 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Structures & Construction Materials group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Home Structures & Construction Materials danger scores

1. Telephones Or Telephone A…45/1002. Computers (equipment And …42/1003. Televisions40/1004. Other Sound Recording, Re…39/1005. Record Players (self-cont…38/1006. Stereo Or Hi-fi Component…38/1007. Television Tables Or Stan…38/1008. Amateur Two-way Radios24/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10024/100
PlainSafety danger score · Amateur Two-way Radios

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 24/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for amateur two-way radios - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 129 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.3% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-37%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for amateur two-way radios are declining by about 37% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2010 (345 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2012 (6 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 475 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the mouth (215 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 879 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.3% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 13 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how amateur two-way radios fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

0100200300400 2005200820112014201720202024 98
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Amateur Two-way Radios, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 139 100 239
5-14 615 264 879
15-24 384 32 416
25-34 230 80 310
35-44 15 0 15
45-54 179 0 179
55-64 250 15 265
65-74 30 55 85
75+ 0 56 56

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Face Laceration 475
Mouth Laceration 215
Head Laceration 210
Head Concussion 175
Eyeball Contusions, Abr. 140
Knee Contusions, Abr. 135
Internal Ingestion 125
Finger Laceration 94
Foot Contusions, Abr. 87
Ear Foreign Body 85
Ankle Contusions, Abr. 75
Shoulder Other 64
Toe Fracture 64
Foot Laceration 60
Lower Trunk Fracture 56

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 94.6% (2,314)
Treated And Transferred 3.1% (75)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 1.6% (40)
Left Without Being Seen 0.7% (18)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 30 · Male · Ear · Foreign Body · 2024

30YOM, COMING IN AFTER A PIECE OF HIS WALKIE-TALKIE EARBUD BECAME STUCK IN HIS LEFT EAR ABOUT 4 HOURS AGO, WAS UNABLE TO REMOVE IT AND NOW WITH PAIN TO THE SITE, DX: FOREIGN BODY OF LEFT EAR

Age 14 · Male · Eyeball · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

14YOM WAS POKED IN THE EYE WITH A WALKIE TALKIE ANTENNA 1 DAY AGO DX: CONJUNCTIVAL ABRASION

Age 3 · Female · Pubic Region · Laceration · 2024

3YOF PRESENTING W/ VAGINAL LACERATION. PT WAS AT DAYCARE EARLIER IN THE DAY AND FELL. DAYCARE DESCRIBED THE FALL AS PT TAKING A TURN WHILE WALKING CARRYING A STICK AND WALKIE-TALKIE WHEN SHE FELL, POSSIBLY ONTO A SHOE ON THE TILE FLOOR INDOORS. DX: VAGINAL LAC; ADMIT

Age 6 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2023

6YOM WAS AT SCHOOL, ACCIDENTALLY HIT IN THE FOREHEAD WITH A WALKIE TALKIE, HAS SMALL LACERATION. DX: LACERATION OF SKIN OF FOREHEAD

Age 62 · Male · Not Stated/unk · Radiation · 2023

62YOM PRESENTS WITH COMPLAINTS OF PAIN AFTER RADIO TRANSMETER RADIATION. PATIENT STATES HE WAS WORKING ON A RADIO TRANSMETER TOWER REPLACING THE EXCITED WHEN HE FOUND OUT THE POWER WAS NOT TURNED OFF. PATIENT RECEIVED A BRIEF BURST OF RADIATION FROM THE ANTENNA. DX: RADIATION BURN.

Age 3 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2021

3YOM PRESENTED TO ED C/O HEAD TRAUMA. PER MOTHER PT WAS HIT WITH WALKIE TALKIE ON THE BACK OF HEAD WHILE IN SCHOOL. DX; HEAD TRAUMA IN CHILD

Age 13 · Female · Ear · Laceration · 2021

13 YOF FRIEND STUCK A WALKIE TALKIE PIECE IN PTS EAR C/O PAIN/BLEEDING DX LACERATION R EAR CANAL

Age 8 · Female · Pubic Region · Contusions, Abr. · 2021

8YOF WHO WAS AT CAMP 3 DAYS AGO WHEN SHE JUMPED ON HER COUNSELOR AND THE WALKIE -TALKIE INJURED HER VAGINA. DX: ABRASION OF FEMALE GENITAL ORGAN.

Age 63 · Male · Internal · Ingestion · 2020

63YOM PATIENT REPORTS GETTING UPSET AND SWALLOWED A TRANSMITTER DX: SWALLOWED FOREIGN BODY

Age 18 · Male · Head · Laceration · 2020

18 YOM WAS OPERATINING A SKIDDER AND THREW HIM UP INTO CB RADIO INJURING HEAD DX LACERATION HEAD

Age 7 · Female · Internal · Ingestion · 2020

7YOF PRESENTS WITH SWALLOWED FOREIGN BODY; PATIENT INGESTED 2 ROUND PLASTIC PIECES FROM WALKIE-TALKIES DX: SWALLOWED FOREIGN BODY *

Age 5 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2020

5YOM HIT HIS HEAD ON A WALKIE TALKIE. DX FOREHEAD LAC

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

8/28/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Digital Blue, Inc. · Illinois

My daughter was using the Disney branded Phineas and Ferb Walkie Talkies for the first time. I noticed they do not work well as [REDACTED]. She brought them to me and said she didn't want to play with them anymore. When she handed it to me, I noticed one of the units was very hot (not warm) to the touch. I opened the unit and pulled out the four batteries that we had put in before our daughter started to play with them. They evidenced melting.

7/9/2020 · Incident, No Injury · Yaesu USA · Tennessee

The Lithium Ion battery pack swelled and cracked down the middle. This battery pack came with the Yaesu FT-70DR handheld transceiver when it was purchased new in April 2019. I immediately stopped using the device for fear the battery may leak or blowup. Since the battery pack rests in the palm of your hand during operation, burns or physical damage to my hand was a major concern. The retailer, Ham Radio Outlet, could not help me since the battery was out of the one year warranty. They referred me to Yaesu, no response.

5/10/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Digital Blue, Inc. · New York

On April 29, 20011 my son was playing with one of his Phineas and Ferb Walkie Talkies. After playing with the toy he must have left it on and placed it on our leather sofa. Approximately 4 hours later we returned home and my husband went to move the walkie talkie so that he could sit on the sofa, when he did this he noticed a gooey melted substance on one side of the walkie talkie. He then called me over to look at what had happened and we both noticed a 4-inch melted and burned area to our leather sofa. The melt/burn caused the sofa to rip and actually show the stuffing on the inside of the sofa. The shape and size of the burn was the exact shape, width, and length of the walkie talkie. The walkie talkie itself felt warm to the touch and had little to no battery power left. We immediately cleaned the substance off of the walkie talkie and then took both walkie talkies away from our son. We then reached out to Toys R Us, where we purchased the walkie talkies, as well as Digital Blue, the company that produces the walkie takies. Toys R Us has followed up and informed us that the case is being reviewed and will be taken very seriously due to the burn that was a result of the product. Digital Blue has not been accommodating or helpful in trying to rectify the situation and will only communicate about this matter through E-mail, no phone number or contact person has been given after numerous attempts acquire one. Digital Blue has also requested several times that we send them the walkie talkies back so that a "new and tested set" can be sent back to us. The company does not take this matter seriously nor are they concerned about the safety and well being of their consumers!

4/8/2015 · Unspecified · Dollar General Corporation · Kentucky

(04/08/2015) The consumer placed batteries in the walkie talkies. As soon as she placed the batteries in the unit, they became too hot to touch. The consumer took the batteries out and the product cooled off. The batteries were brand new [REDACTED] 9 volt alkaline batteries. The consumer tried a different brand of batteries and the same thing happened.

3/4/2021 · Incident, No Injury · BLACK DIAMOND EQUIPMENT · New Mexico

Pieps or Black Diamond labeled avalanche product switch fails to stay in set transmit position. https://www.pieps.com/dsp/. This is a known issue to the MFG and they are claiming to address this with a new case. But it doesn't address the faulty locking switch. Hello, I think the news announcement today from Black Diamond and Pieps is a whitewash of the issue. https://www.pieps.com/dsp/ Snow sports people have bought these beacons and the switch cracks and fails. It has nothing to do with the case. But yet their recall plan that all are hailing across the internet is for a new hard case. "Consumer confidence in our products is paramount, which is why the PIEPS R&D Team has now developed a new hardcase carrying system for all DSP transceivers, to replace the neoprene carrying system supplied with the DSP transceivers. The design of the new hardcase carrying system provides extra safety to ensure the transceivers are locked in the “send” position when in use, and remain securely in the “send” position during use." The switch on my beacon broke, likely from downward forces during switching. And now that it's broken it moves super freely. I doubt it broke from being in the soft case. I don't understand how a hard case prevents this beacon switch from failing. And it won't hold it in position. I live in Abq and have two of this model, one is broken, one still working. Since the magazine is in SF someone can come look at mine and evaluate for themselves. I'm hoping someone call's out Black Diamond/Pieps on the marginality of this voluntary recall. [REDACTED[ It's this kind of reporting that frustrates me, https://buckrail.com/pieps-issues-voluntary-recall-on-all-dsp-avalanche-transceivers/. "Subsequent investigations have shown, however, that the slide switch and lock of the DSP PRO, the DSP PRO ICE, and the DSP SPORT meet all applicable safety standards." Who's safety standards? Mine broke and I only use it lightly. Either

2/8/2012 · Incident, No Injury · Creative Designs International, Ltd. · Maryland

The first and every subsequent times we have turned on our Creative Designs International Disney Pixar Cars 2 Mater and Finn McMissile shaped walkie talkies, we can spell burning and it gets very hot to the touch. All we do is hit the switch to turn it on and it starts burning. It is battery operated. It is a horrible burning plastic smell.

2/25/2014 · Incident, No Injury · JAKKS Pacific, Inc. · Virginia

My 4 year old and I were playing with his walkie talkies mater and Finn Mc missle disney pixar and I just put fresh batteries in not even five minutes after we began playing Finn Mc missle started smoking in my hands and smelling like fire and Burt wires and I shut them both off.

12/26/2019 · Incident, No Injury · Altis Technology Ltd · New York

The grandson opened the walkie talkie (blue) Christmas Eve. The batteries were in the product for approximately 2 hours. When the child got home, the walkie talkie was hot to the touch. The plastic wrap that was wrapped around the battery had split open and the entire walkie talkie was hot to the touch. The parent took the product from the child, removed the batteries and placed everything outside. There were no injuries. There were no know issues with the pink one. The walkie talkie use 3-AAA batteries in each one. Two walkie talkies were in each package.

Showing 8 of 13 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to amateur two-way radios on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Home Structures & Construction Materials

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Amateur Two-way Radios: cross-group products nearest on danger score (24/100), estimated annual ER visits (129/yr), and hospitalization share (3.3%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Amateur Two-way Radios ranks #794 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #743 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does amateur two-way radios rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, amateur two-way radios ranks #794 by PlainSafety danger score (24/100) and #743 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (129/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from amateur two-way radios?

The most common injury is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 475 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from amateur two-way radios increasing or decreasing?

Down 37% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for amateur two-way radios injuries?

The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 879 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by amateur two-way radios?

Of all ER visits involving amateur two-way radios, approximately 3.3% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.7%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with amateur two-way radios?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Amateur Two-way Radios is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.