Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2009, Engine Fuels For Models ranks #794 of 838 by danger score (24/100) at ER-volume #806 of 838 (136/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #794
- danger rank of 838
- #806
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 24/100
- danger score
- 136/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (24/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
24 Among the lowest lower than 95% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2009
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 13/100
One verdict blending 3 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 3 | 23rd | 41% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 136 | 10th | 35% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | N/A | N/A | redistributed | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 0 | 0th | 24% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
5-year injury trend has no recorded value for this category; its weight was redistributed proportionally across the dimensions that do, rather than treated as zero risk.
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 680 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1356. Segments sum to 680 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Toys & Children's Recreation group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Toys & Children's Recreation danger scores
How this 24/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for engine fuels for models - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 136 ER visits/yr Low volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.9% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trendN/A
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 5-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2009, injury counts for engine fuels for models are stable over the most recent five-year window, with the busiest year on record being 2006 (322 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (16 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 244 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by burns, thermal to the lower arm (87 cases). The 45-54 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 185 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.9% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 0 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 11 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how engine fuels for models fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2009-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2009)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 149 | 15 | |
| 5-14 | 20 | 60 | |
| 15-24 | 85 | 0 | |
| 35-44 | 87 | 0 | |
| 45-54 | 185 | 0 | |
| 55-64 | 0 | 80 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Lower Arm | Burns, Thermal | |
| Neck | Burns, Thermal | |
| Face | Burn, Scald | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Face | Burns, Thermal | |
| Face | Burn, Chemical | |
| Lower Leg | Burns, Thermal |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
PT WAS OPENING A 55 GALLON METAL DRUG OF ENGINE FUEL & IT EXPLODED INFACE AT A FRIENDS HOUSE DX: BURNS TO FACE & CHEST
48 YOM SUSTAINED INGESTED ENGINE BOOST BOWY WAS BURNING- DX-INGESTED ENGINE BOOST
55Y/O,F,EXPOSED TO ENGINE FUEL FOR REMOTE CONTROLLED CAR, WOKE WITH EYEPAIN, TEARING, REDNESS, R EYE PAIN
PT INGESTED *** (TOY CAR ACCELERATOR), THOUGH IT WAS CANDY.PRODUCT IS PURPLE POWDER IN 2X2 PACKAGE DX:INGEST SODIUM BICARBONATE
FLAMES FROM A BRUSH FIRE BURNED FACE AFTER PUTTING FUEL ON IT, NO FDBURN TO FACE
AT HOME PT DRANK UNKNOWN AMOUNT OF RACING FUEL,DX ACCIDENTAL INGESTION OF UNKNOWN AMOUNT OF RACING FUEL
DAD HAD *** MODEL CAR FUEL IN A GLASS WHEN WORKING ON MODEL ATHOME, PT DRANK 1 DRINK AND TASTED BAD SO STOPPED, MOM INDUCED VOMITING
51YOM FLASH BURN NECK. BURNING YARD WASTE & USED REMOTE CONTROL AIRPLANE FUEL TO GET IT GOING. LIT WITH CIGARETTE LIGHTER & IT FLASHED. NOFD
INGESTION OF MODEL RACER FUEL. POISONING D/T FUEL INGESTION.
POSSIBLE INGESTION OF GAS FOR REMOTE CONTROL GAS-POWERED TRUCKDX POSS METHANOL INGESTION, MIN AMOUNT
PT INGESTED SOME SPIN OUT FUEL MADE FOR A RACE CAR TO SPIN OUT SOLD WITH THE MODEL CAR- POSSIBLE HYDROCARBON INGESTION
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to engine fuels for models on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Toys & Children's Recreation
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Engine Fuels For Models: cross-group products nearest on danger score (24/100), estimated annual ER visits (136/yr), and hospitalization share (2.9%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
- Amusement Attractions (including Rides) Sports & Recreation Equipment 2.9%admitted
- Manual Hedge Trimmers Lawn & Garden Equipment 2.9%admitted
- Archery (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) Sports & Recreation Equipment 2.9%admitted
- Respiratory Protection Devices Personal Care & Safety Products 2.8%admitted
Related Products in Toys & Children's Recreation
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Engine Fuels For Models ranks #794 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #806 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does engine fuels for models rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, engine fuels for models ranks #794 by PlainSafety danger score (24/100) and #806 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (136/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from engine fuels for models?
The most common injury is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 244 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from engine fuels for models increasing or decreasing?
No trend data.
Who is most at risk for engine fuels for models injuries?
The 45-54 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 185 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by engine fuels for models?
Of all ER visits involving engine fuels for models, approximately 2.9% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.1%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with engine fuels for models?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.