Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Toilet Bowl Products ranks #370 of 838 by danger score (36/100) at ER-volume #457 of 838 (1,670/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #370
- danger rank of 838
- #457
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 36/100
- danger score
- 1,670/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (36/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
36 Around the middle lower than 44% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 50/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 6 | 52nd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 1,670 | 43rd | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | +19% | 81st | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 5 | 34th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 33,405 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 951. Segments sum to 33,405 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Workshop Tools & Equipment danger scores
How this 36/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for toilet bowl products - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 1,670 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 6.0% Above median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend+19%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for toilet bowl products are rising by about 19% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (2,899 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2023 (860 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 20,783 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by burn, chemical to the eyeball (2,544 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 10,873 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 6.0% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 5 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how toilet bowl products fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 5,898 | 4,975 | |
| 5-14 | 1,005 | 607 | |
| 15-24 | 1,094 | 1,787 | |
| 25-34 | 839 | 3,001 | |
| 35-44 | 1,059 | 2,391 | |
| 45-54 | 1,388 | 2,266 | |
| 55-64 | 1,354 | 1,812 | |
| 65-74 | 612 | 1,846 | |
| 75+ | 528 | 942 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Eyeball | Burn, Chemical | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Lower Arm | Burn, Chemical | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| All Parts Body | Anoxia | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Knee | Strain, Sprain | |
| Pubic Region | Other | |
| All Parts Body | Other | |
| Not Stated/unk | Other |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
71 YOF WITH DEMENTIA ACCIDENTLY INGESTED A TOILET BOWL CLEANER TABLET. FAMILY CALLED POISION CONTROL. PATIENT THREW UP AND FAMILY BROUGHT HER TO ER. DX: INGESTION OF TOXIN, N/V
51 YOM C/O RED, SWOLLEN THIGH SINCE REMOVING AN OLD TOLIET AND SPILLED SEWAGE LIKE CLEANING PRODUCTS ON HIMSELFT AT HOME DX CELLULITIS THIGH
44YOF STS GOT TOILET BOWL CLEANER IN EYE C/O R EYE PAIN +CORNEAL ABRASION PRESENT DX L EYE CORNEAL ULCER
2YOM FOUND IN CLOSET DRINKING TOILET BOWL CLEANER. DX: CHEMICAL EXPOSURE.
63YOF - PATIENT PRESENT FOR FOREIGN BODY. PT STATES SHE WAS CLEANING EAR WITH TOILET PAPER AND IT GOT STUCK. DX: FOREIGN BODY OF LEFT EAR
62YOF REPORTS WITH EYE PAIN AND REDNESS AFTER CONTACT WITH CLEANING PRODUCT. PATIENT DOES NOT KNOW THE PRODUCT BUT WAS CLEANING THE TOILET. DX CHEMICAL INJURY TO EYE
59YOF STATES THAT SHE USED A NEW BLUE CHEMICAL TABLET IN HER TOILET BOWL WHEN SHE DEVELOPED FACIAL SWELLING AND ITCHING ALL OVER DX: ALLERGIC REACTION
50YOF PRESENTS WITH BURNING AND BLURRINESS TO RIGHT EYE AFTER ACCIDENTALLY GETTING TOILET BOWL CLEANER SPLASHED IN IT. DX: CHEMICAL CONJUNCTIVITIS OF RIGHT EYE, CORNEAL ABRASION, EYE PAIN
39YOM, COMING IN WITH COUGH AFTER MIXING BLEACH WITH TOILET BOWL CLEANER AND INHALED THE FUMES, WAS IN THE ROOM FOR ABOUT 5 MINUTES, DX: ACUTE COUGH; TOXIC INHALATION, ACCIDENTAL
72YOF PRESENTS AFTER A SYNCOPAL EPISODE IN HER BATHROOM WHERE SHE FELL FROM THE TOILET TO THE FLOOR. DX: FALL WITHOUT INJURY, COVID 19
48YOM PRESENTS WITH INHALTION INJURY. PT STATES THAT HE WAS CLEANING HIS BATHROOM AT HOME WHEN HE USED *** BLEACH AND *** TOILET CLEANER WHICH CONTAINS HYPOCHLOROUS ACID, WHEN THETWO MIXED HE BEGAN TO SMELL BURNING SCENT.HE STATES HIS EYES BECAME IRRITATED AND HE BEGAN COUGHING HAVING SOB. DX: TOXIC EFFECT OF CHLORINE GAS
2YOF, BROUGHT IN BY DAD WHO REPORTS THAT SHE WAS HOLDING TOILET BOWL CLEANER, IN HAND AND MAY HAVE LICKED IT, AS HER TONGUE WAS ALL BLUE, PATIENT IS COMPLETELY ASYMPTOMATIC AND ACTING AT HER BASELINE, POISON CONTROL IDENTIFIED THE PRODUCT AS ***, DX: CHEMICAL EXPOSURE
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
I ordered a product called Bowlsparkle from a website called bowlsparkle.com. It was advertised to be a foaming powder that would clean and sanitize toilet bowls while emitting a "fresh scent." When it came in I used it as directed. Immediately my throat began to burn and I was having trouble breathing due to the fumes. Then my son and I both got headaches. There was no ingredients listed on the box so I tried to [REDACTED] "bowlsparkle ingredients" and landed on a site for the Consumer Product Information Database for a product called "[REDACTED]." If I'm reading the site right, the product is 24 percent hydrochloric acid and has been discontinued due to warnings about irritation of the respiratory tract among other things. The effects of inhaling the fumes lasted all evening. I would really like for this product to be investigated as I believe it is very dangerous
Dear Consumer Product Safety Commission, I am writing to report a serious incident involving a hazardous chemical product that has caused me significant health issues and emotional trauma. I believe it highlights a dangerous gap in product safety and labeling that leaves consumers vulnerable to severe harm. I was exposed to Triple S Strong Arm Heavy Duty Clinging Bowl and Restroom Cleaner, which is labeled For Industrial and Institutional Use Only. Despite this label, the product is easily purchased online by consumers with no meaningful barriers to access. A friend who works in commercial cleaning recommended it and assured me it was safe for home use. After using the product to clean my bathroom, I experienced: Constant burning skin, swelling, and severe allergic reactions. My potassium levels dropped to a dangerously low level, resulting in a critically low heart rate that required emergency medical care. The chemical spread throughout my apartment, contaminating my bedding, clothing, carpet, appliances, and other surfaces. I was trapped in my own home for 40 days with constant exposure. Even after professional decontamination, I continue to fear my home, living with ongoing anxiety and trauma. I believe this product poses a serious risk to consumers, especially given its easy online availability despite its labeling. I am requesting: 1. That the CPSC investigate the products labeling and sales practices to ensure it is not accessible to untrained consumers. 2. That the CPSC review whether the products labeling, warnings, and instructions are adequate to prevent harm in residential settings. 3. That the CPSC consider regulatory or enforcement actions to protect consumers from hazardous products labeled for industrial use. I can provide documentation, medical records, and photos if needed. Please let me know how best to submit them. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I look forward to your response. Sincere
I used KABOOM Bowl Blaster Foaming Toilet Cleaner today, May 4, 2011. My primary concern is that use of the product produces a dust cloud no matter how carefully it is used. The dust is labelled as causing eye and respiratory tract irritation (it does). The product is scented in a way that makes it attractive to children, but it does NOT have a childproof cap. The front label states, "CAUTION: KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN. HARMFUL IF SWALLOWED. CAUSES EYE IRRITATION. READ ADDITIONAL CAUTIONS ON BACK PANELCAREFULLY BEFORE USING." This is a dangerous product that should be made less attractive and accessible to children.
A 51-YOF PATIENT C/O SOB, COUGH, HAD WHEEZING IN LUNGS, FROM EXPOSURE TO BLEACH, AMMONIA AND TOILET BOWL CLEANER WHILE CLEANING BATHROOM; DX: CHEMICAL PNEUMONITIS.
(01/14/2023) The consumer has a safety concern about the product. He stated that they should be removed from the shelves. The consumer used the product for the first time on 1-14. He stated that the fumes bother his nose and gives him a headache. He also stated that the fumes are toxic and gets worse each time the toilet is flushed.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to toilet bowl products on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Toilet Bowl Products: cross-group products nearest on danger score (36/100), estimated annual ER visits (1,670/yr), and hospitalization share (6.0%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Toilet Bowl Products ranks #370 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #457 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does toilet bowl products rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, toilet bowl products ranks #370 by PlainSafety danger score (36/100) and #457 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (1,670/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from toilet bowl products?
The most common injury is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 20,783 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from toilet bowl products increasing or decreasing?
Up 19% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for toilet bowl products injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 10,873 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by toilet bowl products?
Of all ER visits involving toilet bowl products, approximately 6.0% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (94.0%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with toilet bowl products?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.