Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Swimming Pool Slides ranks #574 of 838 by danger score (32/100) at ER-volume #484 of 838 (1,360/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #574
- danger rank of 838
- #484
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 32/100
- danger score
- 1,360/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (32/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
32 Lower than most lower than 68% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 37/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 4 | 37th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 1,360 | 38th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -17% | 40th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 4 | 31st | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 27,219 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1277. Segments sum to 27,219 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Sports & Recreation Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Sports & Recreation Equipment danger scores
How this 32/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for swimming pool slides - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 1,360 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 4.3% Below median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-17%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for swimming pool slides are declining by about 17% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2012 (1,999 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2014 (787 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 3,482 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by internal injury to the head (3,139 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 14,756 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 4.3% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 4 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how swimming pool slides fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 2,580 | 1,893 | |
| 5-14 | 7,825 | 6,931 | |
| 15-24 | 1,278 | 1,750 | |
| 25-34 | 744 | 1,157 | |
| 35-44 | 372 | 1,104 | |
| 45-54 | 271 | 394 | |
| 55-64 | 276 | 201 | |
| 65-74 | 51 | 78 | |
| 75+ | 170 | 102 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Head | Concussion | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Foot | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Knee | Strain, Sprain | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Mouth | Laceration | |
| Neck | Strain, Sprain | |
| Wrist | Fracture | |
| All Parts Body | Submersion | |
| Lower Arm | Fracture | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
6YOM FELL DOWN INFLATABLE SLIDE INTO A POOL OF WATER, HIT HEAD WITH LOC. DX: CONCUSSION
8 YOM HIT HIS HEAD ON THE SLIDE AT THE POOL. DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY
10YOF HAND PAIN WHEN GOING DOWN A WATER SLIDE INTO A SWIMMING POOL AT AN AT HOME BIRTHDAY POOL PARTYDX SPRAIN/ STRAIN L WRIST
3YOM GOING DOWN A SWIMMING POOL SLIDE INTO A POOL AND C/O EYELID LACDX FACIAL LAC
11YOF WAS SLIDING DOWN THE SLIDE AT A POOL STATED THAT SHE STRUCK THE SIDE OF THE SLIDE WITH HER FOOT AND ANKLE AND THEN ALSO STRUCK THE BOTTOM OF THE POOL. STATES HE HAS PAIN IN THE LATERAL ASPECT OF HER RIGHT ANKLE AND FOOT. DX: ANKLE SPRAIN AND STRAIN
12YOF WAS ON A SLIDE AT A SWIMMING POOL AND CUT ELBOW. DX LACERATION TO ELBOW
8 YOF SLIPPED OFF SLIDE OF ABOVE GROUND POOL LANDED ON ANKLE DX ANKLE FX
9 YOM HIT HEAD ON SLIDE OF SWIMMING POOL. DX FACE LACERATION, CLOSED HEAD INJURY
27YOF PRESENTS WITH ABDOMINAL PAIN AFTER GOING DOWN THE SWIMMING POOL SLIDE SEVERAL TIMES AT A RESORT; PATIENT IS PREGNANT AND THINKS SHE WAS 'BUMPED AROUND' DX: PELVIC CRAMPING, PELVIC AND PERINEAL PAIN
4 YOM FALL FROM POOL SLIDE DX HEAD INJURY
12YOM, GOING DOWN SWIMMING POOL SLIDE ON HIS A STOMACH WHEN HIT HIS FACE ON THE BOTTOM OF THE SLIDE KNOCKING OUT HIS 2 FRONT TEETH DX: AVULSION OF MULTIPLE TEETH DUE TO TRAUMA; CLOSED FRACTURE OF NASAL BONE; OPEN FRACTURE OF MAXILLA
47YO UNK ***, WAS GOING HEAD FIRST DOWN A SWIMMING POOL SLIDE AND STRUCK NOSE ONTO THE EDGE OF THE SWIMMING POOL, NO LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS, NOSE WAS BLEEDING PROFUSELY THEN BECAME LIGHTHEADED AND CONFUSED DX: CLOSED FRACTURE OF NASAL BONE; CLOSED HEAD INJURY; EPISTAXIS
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Commercial slide produced by SR Smith ("Vortex"). A child was climbing up the slide ladder and fell off the ladder onto the deck below it. There is no defect in the slide, or ladder; however, the question is whether the idea of a metal ladder at 8 - 9 feet of height is appropriate for the slide. The slide is sold with two options: a ladder and a stair kit. Our slide was purchased with the ladder. The ladder provides access at a steeper angle and requires more coordination and strength to climb. A ladder provides no protection for a fall backwards. The concern is whether a ladder access to the slide top is appropriate given the other concepts around a summer pool. For example, the ladder is always wet, and while the stair treads have a rough surface, the hand railings can get slippery when they are wet. Also, children wear sun screen, which is very slipper, and makes the railing slick. A stairway, while presenting some of the same problems, appears to be a much better solution and we will likely be changing our ladder to a stairway as a result of the fall. The child that fell will thankfully suffer no long term injuries, but the fall from the top of the ladder indicated to me that there is a potential safety hazard that should be addressed - possibly by discontinuing the option of an open ladder to such a commercially offered slide and instead only selling it with a stairway. The fall also appears to have nothing to do with the treads, it wasn't a missed step or slip, the child fell straight backwards onto the deck below, it seems it was more a result of missing the coordination necessary to hold the steep railing while climbing up- something that a stair kit would assist.
I set up the Banzai Wave Crasher Surf Slide for my children ages 5 and 6. It clearly stated on the box, and in the directions that it is intended for children ages 5-12 up to 110 lbs. which both of my smaller children are at least half of that weight size. After properly setting up the slide according to every detail of the instructions it was immediately realized that this product was hazardous; as well as has a poor design. The slide is not even attached to the pool. The pool looses air for some reason, and once the children began attempting to slide the [REDACTED] that is supposed to attach the slide to the pool comes undone after it gets wet. Then when the children attempt to slide down the slide it tips over, and knocks them off causing them to land on various body parts. The inflatable walls on the sides of the slide easily bend down, and allow the children to go flying off in mid-slide. Half of the time they didn't even land in the pool, they land in the crack between the slide and the pool, or half in the pool half out of it if they even made it past the slide.
My neighbor, an adult man of average height and weight (in other words, BELOW the maximum weight limit of 200 lbs. as indicated on the water slide), went down the water slide on his stomach. Though as far as I can tell the slide did not deflate in any way, my neighbor hit the cement underneath the bottom of the slide. He surfaced in severe pain and was later diagnosed with a cardiac contusion...his HEART was bruised! We learned from Day 1 that the slide was not appropriate for adults, even adults well below the 200 lb. weight limit, and probably not for children such as pre-teens who are on the bigger side. We found out when my husband, brother-in-law and I each decided to give it a go, only to find that we painfully bumped our behinds on the cement underneath the bottom of the slide. Unfortunately, my neighbor was not aware of the "no adults" rule and was halfway down the slide before I realized he was on it, and I was unable to stop him in time. The below date SHOULD be correct--I know it was in the summer of 2009 and most likely on July 4th--but I checked off "estimated" to be safe.
We purchased a blow up water slide to go on the side of our in ground pool. When we used it, we inflated it correctly, put it in the correct position, we were under the weight limit. When I went down the slide, I hit my tailbone on the cement around the pool and damaged some discs in my back. 2 of my daughters also hit their tailbones.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to swimming pool slides on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Sports & Recreation Equipment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Swimming Pool Slides: cross-group products nearest on danger score (32/100), estimated annual ER visits (1,360/yr), and hospitalization share (4.3%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Sports & Recreation Equipment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Swimming Pool Slides ranks #574 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #484 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does swimming pool slides rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, swimming pool slides ranks #574 by PlainSafety danger score (32/100) and #484 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (1,360/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from swimming pool slides?
The most common injury is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 3,482 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from swimming pool slides increasing or decreasing?
Down 17% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for swimming pool slides injuries?
The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 14,756 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by swimming pool slides?
Of all ER visits involving swimming pool slides, approximately 4.3% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (95.7%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with swimming pool slides?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.