Ductwork For Heating Or Cooling Systems
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Kitchen Small Appliances & Housewares · CPSC Code 371
Down 28% over 5 years
The verdict
Ductwork For Heating Or Cooling Systems carry a danger score of 35/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 7,008 ER-treated injuries a year that are declining by about 28% over the last five years.
- 35/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 7,008
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 4.3%
- end in hospital admission
- 0-4
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 371 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 35/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for ductwork for heating or cooling systems - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume7,008 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)4.3%
- Fatality rate0.00%
- 5-year trend-28%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Ductwork For Heating Or Cooling Systems (CPSC product code 371, in the Kitchen Small Appliances & Housewares category) generate an estimated 7,008 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 140,158 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 35/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are declining by about 28% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2010 (8,981 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2022 (4,463 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for ductwork for heating or cooling systems is laceration to the head, accounting for approximately 12,094 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by internal injury to the head (10,756 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 30,202 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 4.3% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 12 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how ductwork for heating or cooling systems fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 18,762 | 11,440 | |
| 5-14 | 11,849 | 8,384 | |
| 15-24 | 6,026 | 6,334 | |
| 25-34 | 7,605 | 8,009 | |
| 35-44 | 7,014 | 6,893 | |
| 45-54 | 6,514 | 6,384 | |
| 55-64 | 5,664 | 7,297 | |
| 65-74 | 3,836 | 6,186 | |
| 75+ | 4,530 | 7,349 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Foot | Laceration | |
| Toe | Laceration | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Knee | Laceration | |
| Lower Leg | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Arm | Laceration | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| All Parts Body | Anoxia |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
23YOM BUMPED INTO A PIECE OF DUCT WORK WHILE MOVING A PIECE OF FURNITURE RESULTING IN A LACERATION TO HIS LEFT ELBOW. DX: LACERATION OF LEFT ELBOW
27YOF PRESENTS WITH LACERATION TO LT GREAT TOE AFTER SHE TRIPPED OVER A RETURN AIR VENT. DX: INJURY OF GREAT TOE OF LEFT FOOT
15MOF - MOM WAS CARRYING PT AND FELL. PT HIT HEAD ON A VENT IN THE FLOOR. DX: FOREHEAD LACERATION
16 YOM BANGED TOE ON AIR VENT IN THE HOUSE. DX TOE CONTUSION, TOENAIL AVULSION
67 YOF LEFT FOOT PAIN. PATIENT REPORTS SHE BEEN HAVING PERSISTENT LEFT FOOT PAIN FOR THE PAST 2 WEEKS AFTER SHE HIT IT AGAINST A METAL VENT. DX PAIN JOINT ANKLE AND FOOT
78 YOM WALKING IN HIS KITCHEN STEPPED INTO A VENT AND FELL ONTO HIS RIGHT SHOULDER C/O SHOULDER AND NECK PAIN DX RIGHT SHOULDER DISLOCATION, CORACOID PROCESS FX
33 YOF ACCIDENTLY CUT TOE ON HEATING VENT AT HOME DX LACERATION TOE
72YOM PRESENTS WITH A FOREIGN BODY IN HIS EYE AFTER CLEANING AN AIR VENT AND A PIECE OF SHRAPNEL WENT IN HIS EYE. DX: PAIN OF EYE
53YOM, WAS WALKING IN THE BASEMENT WHERE THEY ARE CURRENTLY INSTALLING NEW DUCTWORK AND ACCIDENTALLY WALKED INTO A DUCT HITTING HEAD WITHOUT LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND NOT ON BLOOD THINNERS, DX: HEAD INJURY; SCALP LACERATION
57YOM, ACCIDENTALLY CUT FINGER WHILE CLEANING A VENT DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT INDEX FINGER WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY
2MOM WAS BEING HELD BY MOM. MOM TRIPPED ON A VENT ON THE FLOOR & FELL & THE PT STRUCK HIS HEAD. DX: HEAD INJURY
58YOM, IS 6'5 FEET IN HEIGHT WAS WALKING IN THE BASEMENT AND STRUCK THE TOP OF HIS HEAD ON A VENT IN THE CEILING, NO LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS, DX LACERATION OF SCALP
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
We had our fire dampers checked in March, out of 221, 128 failed to close and latch as they should. I contacted Greenheak Fan worked with a [REDACTED], and eneded up getting all replaced at no charge. I had sent them 5 dampers, to check out, and they said they had cut the material too short in the construction process. I also contacted [REDACTED] with the UL, and he also helped in getting the replacements. My concern is how many other Hospitals, or nursing homes out there have these bad fire dampers in them, that will not work per design when there is a fire.
This product is being sold at Lowes. [REDACTED]. Using this product [COULD] cause lint to build up on the outside of the home and clog the dryer vent causing a fire risk or CO buildup.
CO incident with injury to young children. Local investigators suspect leak and possible product defect associated with vent pipe to gas boiler.
Keen Home Smart Vents - these are ceiling mounted HVAC vents that open and close via temp sensors through a vent to close off/on HVAC throughout a room. They weigh 2 to 4 pounds and have (4) AA batteries of weight too. These vents are manufactured in two pieces with one piece being the actual vent portion mated with a housing type bracket that is installed into a trim kit and then mounted on a ceiling or wall. The housing and vent are mated together with just (6) strips of double sided tape. So over time, 12 to 18 months the tape fails to hold the vent in the housing - and the entire assembly just falls crashing down on top of whatever is under it. If it's a pet, elderly person or small child they could be easily injured. There is also a deco vent cover held on by 4 magnents - these magnets are glued and the glue fails too - on cases where the vent hasn't totally fallen out, the vent deco cover ha when the glued magnets fail. Two of four of these vents failed in my home and crashed to the floor. I notified Keen Home twice and they refused to respond. Also, their eCommerce site, doesn't have a place to open help requests and there isn't a phone number. http://help.keenhome.io/en/ The company doesn't want to be bothered with or cares if someone using their product is hurt. I feel this product is a safety hazard. I had two incidents, no injuries. One was April 12th 2019 and July 1 2019
Had new Roof put on with power vent to prevent mold and in less than two years there is substantial mold which needed to be remeated. This was the most expensive roof with new technologies for better roofing. The roof was $15000 on a 1300sq ft ranch house with hip roof. 50 yr warranty but not standing by product.
I recently purchased a Deflect-o Hardware Dryer Vent Kit from Home Depot. When I tried to install it, the plastic zip ties included with the kit do not work properly. The zip ties are used to attached the duct to the dryer and vent pipe. The zip ties included with this kit do not hold tight or have the ability to come loose. This poses a huge health and safety risk! This product should be recalled for this reason!
During investigation into condensation dripping in attic from a range vent hood duct we noticed that the roof cap design and installation guidelines would permit direct venting of the range hood into the attic.
Honeywell MS4120F 1006 actuators were being used in the Lincoln Tower fire suppression system in Bellevue, WA. During an annual test for the fire department, a majority of the actuators that were supposed to fail open to allow relief air out of the building, failed to operate properly. Out of 9 actuators tested, 6 exhibited the same failure. The failure was occurring at the main gear shaft. This metal shaft was intended to be mechanically pressed into the spring case and become displaced and loose. The shaft had been only partially pressed into the spring case with allowed the shaft to 'rock' in the improper joint which eventually lead to the shaft coming free. Once the shaft joint was compromised, the interior cover bore the eccentric loading from the gear shaft which it was not designed to withstand. The gear cover then broke loose as well, causing the gears to move out of place, grind on each other and eventually causing the gears to become stuck and unable to move.
Showing 8 of 12 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to ductwork for heating or cooling systems on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are ductwork for heating or cooling systems?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, ductwork for heating or cooling systems have a danger score of 35/100 (low risk). An estimated 7,008 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from ductwork for heating or cooling systems?
The most common injury is laceration to the head, accounting for approximately 12,094 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from ductwork for heating or cooling systems increasing or decreasing?
Down 28% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for ductwork for heating or cooling systems injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 30,202 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by ductwork for heating or cooling systems?
Of all ER visits involving ductwork for heating or cooling systems, approximately 4.3% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (95.7%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with ductwork for heating or cooling systems?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Kitchen Small Appliances & Housewares
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 35/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 0-4 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.