Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Respiratory Protection Devices ranks #213 of 838 by danger score (39/100) at ER-volume #554 of 838 (852/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #213
- danger rank of 838
- #554
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 39/100
- danger score
- 852/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (39/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
39 Around the middle lower than 25% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 39/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 3 | 23rd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 852 | 31st | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | +2054% | 100th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 5 | 34th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 15,339 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1618. Segments sum to 15,339 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Personal Care & Safety Products group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Personal Care & Safety Products danger scores
How this 39/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for respiratory protection devices - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 852 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.8% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend+2054%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for respiratory protection devices are rising by about 2054% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2020 (5,122 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2015 (15 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is derma/conjunct to the face, accounting for approximately 3,265 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by other to the face (1,237 cases). The 55-64 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 2,218 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 5 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how respiratory protection devices fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 137 | 136 | |
| 5-14 | 906 | 741 | |
| 15-24 | 938 | 913 | |
| 25-34 | 1,100 | 696 | |
| 35-44 | 902 | 860 | |
| 45-54 | 881 | 1,107 | |
| 55-64 | 1,374 | 844 | |
| 65-74 | 705 | 1,005 | |
| 75+ | 583 | 1,507 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Face | Derma/conjunct | |
| Face | Other | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Ear | Other | |
| All Parts Body | Other | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Internal | Ingestion | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Lower Trunk | Fracture | |
| Ear | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Ear | Foreign Body | |
| Head | Other | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Eyeball | Foreign Body |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
64YOF - PATIENT PRESENT FOR EYE PAIN. PT WAS POKED IN THE EYE WITH PLASTIC MASK. DX: SUPERFICIAL INJURY OF CORNEA.
67YOF TO ED WITH C/O OF NECK PAIN FOR 2 DAYS, DX NECK PAIN, LIKELY SECONDARY TO THE PRESSURE OF HER EAR LOOP FROM HER FACIAL MASK, DX NECK PAIN
32YOM,CANNABINOID,HALLUCINATIONS MAY HAVE SWALLOWED METAL PRONG,FROM MASK,ANXIETY DISORDER,DX:FB STOMACH,DRUG USE
23 YOF STATES SHE'S ALLERGIC TO SURGICAL MASKS AS WELL AS N95 MASK. TODAY SHE TOUCHED A MASK WITH HER LEFT HAND AND DEVELOPED TONGUE SWELLING AND ITCHINESS TO HER LIPS. DX: ALLERGIC REACTION
32 YOM. SWALLOWED A PIECE OF METAL WIRE FROM A FACE MASK. +MARIJUANA. DX: SWALLOWED FOREIGN BODY
51YOF C/O RASH ON FACE S/P PT STATES SHE WENT TO A STUDENT'S HOME AND WORE A FACE MASK DURING THE VISIT. SHE NOW PRESENTS WITH A RASH ON HER UPPER LIP, CHIN, CHEEK AND RIGHT EYELID. DX: RASH
57 YOM WAS WEARING A MASK WHILE WORKING IN HIS ATTIC AND THINKS IT CONTRIBUTED TO A PIMPLE WHICH SWELLED. DX: CELLULITIS OF FACE
55YOF, HAS BEEN USING A FACE MASK FOR OVER 10 HOURS FOR THE PAST SEVERAL DAYS TO AVOID GETTING SICK, SINCE HAS DEVELOPED BILATERAL BAND-LIKE SENSATION ACROSS THE FACE, DX: FACIAL PAIN
45YOM, REPORTS THAT DURING CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC DEVELOPED CHRONIC NASAL IRRITATION FROM WEARING THE MASK RESULTING IN INTERMITTENT BLEEDING FROM THE BRIDGE OF HIS NOSE, DX: BLEEDING [BRIDGE OF NOSE]
51YOF PRESENTS WITH NECK AND FACE ITCHING AFTER WEARING A CLOTH FACE MASK. DX: CONTACT DERMATITIS.
71YOF PRESENTS TO ED STATING, IT FEELS LIKE I'M WALKING THROUGH ***. ENDORSING GENTLE CHEST PAIN AND LEFT SHOULDER PAIN
29YOF TO ER FOR ABSCESS OF FACE, PT SAYS USED A NEW FACIAL MASK X 1 DAY & IMMEDIATLY AFTER HAD PAIN & IRRITATION TO CHIN, PT SAYS TODAY SWOLLEN AREA HAS SOREAD DX ABSCESS OF FACE, CELLULITIS OF FACE
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
3m mask microfiber plastics shed and caused caller to have a slight cough. Submitter says that he was wearing the product on the bus when he noticed the fibers shedding. When he lifted the product from over his mouth a few times, he felt the fibers in his mouth. Submitter says later that evening he felt fibers in his ear, nose and mouth. He developed a slight cough and felt a slight tickle in the same areas. Over the next few days that cough began to subside. Submitter contacted the 3M company and was informed that the product is made according to the safety standards so they could not assist him.
I am a homeowner. The 3M Company manufactures particulate respirator masks called 8210PLUS N95 Tekk Protection that create health hazards by themselves. I have used these masks for years and realized that they release their own microfibers into the upper lung and lower throat that causes irritation and inflammation the day after I use them -- regardless of the levels of particulates in the room in which I used them. They are a health hazard and should be recalled.
The consumer stated that when she tried to put the mask on, the staple came off, releasing the elastic. The staple on the end of the elastic hit the consumer on her eye. The consumer stated that there is a hole in the mask where the staple came off from. The consumer stated this happened to two of the masks in the package. With one of the mask, the incident occurred while the mask was in consumer's hand. With the other mask, the incident occurred as the consumer went to put the mask on her face. The consumer believes this product can severely injure someone.
Safety first baby Aspirator. Was intended to use with my newborn baby. My baby was both by c-section so had some mucous from birth, but also had a habit of spitting up though her nose. Because babies cannot breath through there mouth as a newborn it is very very important to have an aspirator on hand at all times to ensure you can relieve your babies panic and choking when they need it. My husband brought this product at the Navy Exchange and when the time came that my baby spit up through her nose. She started gasping for air, so my husband passed the brand new aspirator to me and I went to relieve my choking panicking baby. As I squeezed the product as you normally do with an aspirator to my shock and dismay the end came clean off! The product is useless. We had to scrabble for the other aspirator which was being used for night time upstairs. Thankfully both my husband and I are infant first aid qualified and where able to help our baby until we could relieve her breathing with the other aspirator we had been given by the hospital! I am horrified by this product and am thankful that we knew what to do and had another aspirator to use. This product should not be on shelves and I have reviewed this product in numerous places warning other parents of the hazard. Please do something about this terrible and dangerous product.
I purchases a box of 8511 Particulate Respirator masks made by 3M. All masks failed the same way allowing unfiltered air to enter the mask. The masks has a defective Cool Flow Valve installed to allow one to easily exhale air however this rubber type valve sticks open. I use this mask approximately 10 minutes a day then place it in a plactic bag to keep it clean for the next day. After two to three uses the valve gets warped and does not close. I have been in attic when the valve part has fallen off the mask and or gotten stuck open. I think this is a poor design it has lead to problems. I thought I was protected with a N95 Approved mask only to find out all the air I was breathing was coming through the valve with no filtration. I still have the box and some unused masks but I will never risk my health using this type of make again. I think this mask is a health hazard. Thank you, [REDACTED]
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to respiratory protection devices on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Personal Care & Safety Products
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Respiratory Protection Devices: cross-group products nearest on danger score (39/100), estimated annual ER visits (852/yr), and hospitalization share (2.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Personal Care & Safety Products
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Respiratory Protection Devices ranks #213 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #554 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does respiratory protection devices rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, respiratory protection devices ranks #213 by PlainSafety danger score (39/100) and #554 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (852/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from respiratory protection devices?
The most common injury is derma/conjunct to the face, accounting for approximately 3,265 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from respiratory protection devices increasing or decreasing?
Up 2054% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for respiratory protection devices injuries?
The 55-64 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 2,218 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by respiratory protection devices?
Of all ER visits involving respiratory protection devices, approximately 2.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with respiratory protection devices?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.