Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Plastic Containers (rigid Or Semi-rigid) ranks #313 of 838 by danger score (37/100) at ER-volume #229 of 838 (8,322/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #313
- danger rank of 838
- #229
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 37/100
- danger score
- 8,322/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (37/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
37 Around the middle lower than 37% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 62/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 5 | 45th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 8,322 | 68th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -10% | 50th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 198 | 93rd | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 166,480 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1123. Segments sum to 166,480 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Containers & Packaging group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Containers & Packaging danger scores
How this 37/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid) - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 8,322 ER visits/yr Above median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 5.2% Below median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-10%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid) are declining by about 10% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2017 (11,606 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2006 (4,727 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 12,057 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the face (10,000 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 28,057 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 5.2% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 198 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 16,585 | 11,472 | |
| 5-14 | 12,461 | 8,849 | |
| 15-24 | 6,794 | 6,890 | |
| 25-34 | 7,258 | 11,058 | |
| 35-44 | 8,439 | 10,226 | |
| 45-54 | 6,632 | 10,330 | |
| 55-64 | 6,282 | 11,460 | |
| 65-74 | 5,298 | 10,799 | |
| 75+ | 4,826 | 10,779 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Mouth | Laceration | |
| Internal | Ingestion | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Foot | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
47YOF PRESENTS TO ED W/INJURY T SHOULDER. PT TRIPPED ON A MILK CRATE. TWISTED AND EXTENDED RT ARM AS WELL. HAS 8 OUT OF 10 PAIN. DX: TEAR RT ROTATOR CUFF.
30 YOM INJURED SHOULDER LIFTING A CRATE DX: STRAIN
49YOF- PATIENT PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER A HEAVY TOTE FULL OF THINGS FELL ON HER LEFT KNEE YESTERDAY AT HOME. DX: LEFT KNEE INJURY
11 YOF SCRAPED TOE ON A PLASTIC TOTE DX: ABRASION
42 YOF STATES A PLATIC BIN ACCIDENTALLY FELL ON HER RIGHT HAND AND INJURYED HER FINGER. DX: FINGER FX
43YOF - MILK CRATE FELL ON PTS LEG. DX: LEG LACERATION
70YOF TRIPPED OVER A PLASTIC CONTAINER AND FELL ONTO SHOULDER. DX: HUMERUS FX
85YOF PATIENT TRIPPED OVER A *** CONTAINER FALLING OVER IT LANDING ON HER LEFT SHIN AND HITTING HER LEFT FLANK ON THE EDGE OF THE CONTAINER DX: GROUND LEVEL FALL, CHEST WALL PAIN, HEMATOMA AND CONTUSION LEFT LEG
5 WOM WAS BEING HELD BY FATHER WHEN SIBLING ACCIDENTALLY HIT PT'S HEAD WITH A PLASTIC HOLDER CONTAINING PLAYING CARDS. DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY, ABRASION OF FOREHEAD.
31 YOF. LT WRIST PAIN AFTER PICKING UP 5 GALLON WATER JUG 2 DAYS AGO. DX: LT WRIST INJURY
10 YOF AFTER BEING BULLIED AT SCHOOL, GOT PLASTIC CONTAINER AND STARTED CUTTING SELF DX SI FOREARM ABRASIONS
53 YOF. DIZZINESS AFTER PT FELL & STRUCK HEAD ON PLASTIC BOX. DX: DIZZINESS
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
I purchased a bottle of Garden of Life Dr. Formulated Kids Elderberry Immune Gummies for my children. On the evening of September 6, 2025, my five- and four-year-old daughters were able to access the bottle and consume twenty-five gummies. The cap was labeled as push down & turn to open, but it was defective it opened with only a simple twist, without requiring downward pressure. The product was being stored in my home and intended for supervised use by my children as a daily supplement. At the time of the incident, the bottle was in a secure location, but because the cap was not truly child-resistant, my children were able to open it. I immediately contacted Poison Control for guidance, as I did not know what effects the gummies could have on my children. Fortunately, no serious injuries occurred in this case, but there was a clear risk of overdose or harm. If this had been another Garden of Life product, such as their childrens multivitamins containing higher-risk ingredients, the consequences could have been life-threatening. This defective cap design presents a significant danger to children and fails to meet the safety expectations of child-resistant packaging.
I have been drinking a bottle of Diet Coke every day for decades. Last week, after I removed the cap of the bottle I was about to consume, I noticed the cap on the bottle had a protrusion showing well beyond the bottom of the bottle cap. It was a circle of tiny sharp triangles, like little shark's teeth ! As this had never happened before I assumed it was a one-off and discarded the bottle with the cap into the recycling bin. Then, a couple of days ago, I had such difficulty opening a different bottle of diet coke that even after using 2 of the little rubber discs to improve traction, I had to boil some water and pour it over the top of the bottle to get it to open. Then I saw the same protrusion mentioned above, but not protruding quite as much. Still, the protrusion was sharp enough to cut a consumer.
Was excited to have a plastic free water bottle for my 2 yr old when I bought the 12 oz Kids Wide Mouth / straw lid from Hydroflask. However we were at the zoo in a hot day, my son was drinking from it with the straw in his mouth, tripped on my husbands foot and fell over. When I picked him up screaming there was blood all over his mouth. Turns out there is a sharp prong on the straw to prevent leaks when closed but cut my sons upper lip and skin. I hadnt noticed it before and even now realize how sharp it is even if he didnt fall.
The packaging is not child resistant as required
On Amazon, I ordered a product called "Jucaifu 8 Ounce reuseable small plastic freezer storage container jars with screw lid for food snacks lunch(8Pcs, Yellow)". These food containers are terrible. They are not safe! Plastic is leaching into food. EVERY single container went bad within a month, and I take very good care of my food containers. I never put them into the dishwasher, and I never use hot water on them. I don't even put food into them when it's too hot, and I don't microwave to hot temperatures when food is in plastic. I only clean them by hand, without any brushes. I treated these containers the same way that I do with my [REDACTED] containers, and all the other brands I have, and I have never had any of these issues. As you can see in the pictures, one of these containers had parts coming off from the bottom inside-surface, which must have gotten into my food. All of the other containers eventually had hundreds of tiny cracks all over them, within just one or two months of using them, which you can see in the last two pictures. This is terrible quality plastic. I don't know what this is made of, but it can't actually be plastic number 5. This is not safe for food.
CVS Prescription medication bottles are defective and do not require pushing down to open - endangering children.
I ordered a Lidocaine 5% numbing cream manufactured / distributed by SAMNYTE from an Amazon retailer and discovered after receiving it that it was not in a childproof container as required. The tube in which the product is delivered is easily mistaken for toothpaste. I have four little children and the last thing I need is for them to brush their teeth with Lidocain cream or ingest this product.
I ordered a lidocaine cream from amazon. Samnyte is the brand. From my knowledge as an Emergency Medicine Physician, and my training, I know this product should have a Child Resistant Closure on it. It does not.
Showing 8 of 198 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid) on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Containers & Packaging
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Plastic Containers (rigid Or Semi-rigid): cross-group products nearest on danger score (37/100), estimated annual ER visits (8,322/yr), and hospitalization share (5.2%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Containers & Packaging
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Plastic Containers (rigid Or Semi-rigid) ranks #313 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #229 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid) rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid) ranks #313 by PlainSafety danger score (37/100) and #229 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (8,322/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid)?
The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 12,057 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid) increasing or decreasing?
Down 10% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid) injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 28,057 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid)?
Of all ER visits involving plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid), approximately 5.2% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (94.8%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with plastic containers (rigid or semi-rigid)?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.