Adhesives
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Home Workshop Tools & Equipment · CPSC Code 909
Stable over 5 years
The verdict
Adhesives carry a danger score of 37/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 7,964 ER-treated injuries a year that are roughly flat over the last five years.
- 37/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 7,964
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 1.9%
- end in hospital admission
- 0-4
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 909 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 37/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for adhesives - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume7,964 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)1.9%
- Fatality rate0.00%
- 5-year trend+8%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Adhesives (CPSC product code 909, in the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment category) generate an estimated 7,964 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 159,275 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 37/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (9,737 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2015 (6,299 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for adhesives is foreign body to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 33,566 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by contusions, abr. to the eyeball (26,971 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 27,384 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 1.9% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 22 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how adhesives fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 13,073 | 14,311 | |
| 5-14 | 9,539 | 16,090 | |
| 15-24 | 9,943 | 13,614 | |
| 25-34 | 8,643 | 13,691 | |
| 35-44 | 8,449 | 10,554 | |
| 45-54 | 5,510 | 8,330 | |
| 55-64 | 4,082 | 7,722 | |
| 65-74 | 3,043 | 6,464 | |
| 75+ | 2,831 | 3,390 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Eyeball | Foreign Body | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Face | Foreign Body | |
| Face | Other | |
| Eyeball | Burn, Chemical | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Finger | Other | |
| Finger | Burn, Scald | |
| Hand | Burn, Scald | |
| Finger | Burns, Thermal | |
| Face | Derma/conjunct |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
23 YOF STATES SHE CUT HER THUMB 2 DAYS AGO, ***D IT TODAY, NOW SHE IS UNABLE TO MOVE IT. DX: CELLULITIS OF LEFT THUMB
40YOM EYE PAIN WHEN RUBBING EYE WITH FINGER THAT HAD GLUE ON ITDX FB EYE
68 YOF ACCIDENTLY USED GLUE THOUGHT WAS EYEDROPS DX FB EXTERNAL EYE
8YOF WAS PUTTING ON NAILS AND GOT *** IN EYE, LASHES STUCK TOGETHER, DX INJURY TO EYE AREA/FACE
74 YOF WAS DOING A SLEEP STUDY LAST NIGHT AND DURING THE STUDY, FELT A STINGING SENSATION FROM THE ADHESIVE ON A LEAD THAT WAS PLACED NEAR HER EYE. DX: ABRASION LEFT CORNEA.
50 YOF BURNED HAND ON HOT GLUE. DX BURN
76YOM - PATIENT PRESENT FOR EYE PROBLEM. PT C/O EYE PAIN AFTER PUTTING GLUE IN THE LEFT EYE. DX: REFUSAL OF TREATMENT BY PATIENT.
72YOF WALKED IN TO ED AFTER EXPOSING CHEMICAL (***) TO LEFT EYE AT 1000 THIS AM. DX:NONE.
10YOF PT WITH FOREIGN BODY TO RT EYE; GOT HOT GLUE IN EYE WHILE CRAFTING A MASK & PUTTING IT ON HER FACE BEFORE GLUE WAS DRY DX: RT CORNEAL ABRASION
82YOF PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER THE PATIENT MISTOOK *** FOR EYEDROPS COMPLAINING OF EYE PAIN AND VISION ISSUES. DX: EYE INJURY, CORNEAL ABRASION
61YOF TO ER FOR ACCIDENTALLY PUTTING *** INTO HER LEFT EYE RATHER THEN HER NEW MEDICATION, 20 MINS AGO DX CHEMICAL EXPOSURE OF LEFT EYE
14YOM GOT *** ON HIS PENIS AND DEVELOPED A RASH DX: SKIN IRRITATION DUE TO TROPICAL AGENT
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
I purchased a chemical consumer product (glue) on Amazon. The item has no list of ingredients or MSDS on the packaging or the company website. Amazon also does not list ingredients or MSDS on their website. Given this is a chemical I am concerned about this. I notified Amazon and received no response, and returned the product without using it. Here is a link to the product on Amazon's site: [REDACTED]
I am concerned that the manufacturer is not properly listing CPSC/GHS hazard warning information on the labels. This product can be purchased from TEMU. This product is a UV resin that is advertised to be used for DIY art, jewelry, table top and molds.
A small drop fell onto my pant leg. The product was listed as non toxic. It started smoking and burning immediately. The product burned my skin and left chemical burn. Luckily it was a small amount but it hurt a lot. It left a blister
I began using Krazy Glue to construct a complicated model after the technical expert on the product information line explained that the glue cannot harm skin. The glue contacted my hands as I was using it and it wrinkled my skin. My skin also turned bright red in certain places and it feels drier now. I saw numerous doctors for treatment, but there seems to be no cure for the skin wrinkling, residual redness, and dryness. The damage is permanent. I have contacted the company many times since the incident occurred. Unfortunately, the company only seems interested in making false claims of dermatological safety, giving me the run around, or ignoring me. Even after sending detailed information about the problem and the dangers of the product, the company only shows disdain for the consumer and does not show any concern for customer health or safety in this matter. My own analysis of this product leads me to believe the skin dangers of this product are mostly related to high strength contraction upon curing and possibly uneven curing. These factors may be the primary causes of the dangers of this product previously mentioned. Elmers has acted unethically in this matter by deceiving me about the safety of the product, misrepresenting expertise on the product, and not taking an interest in health or safety regarding this matter. This unethical conduct reflects poorly on Elmers Products Inc. and also its parent company, the Berwind Corporation.
Re: Serious and Dangerous Product Packaging defect. Dear Sir/Madam, I recently purchased the "5 Second Fix" which is Distributed by OnTel, in Faifield NJ 07004. The package came with no damage to the outer packaging. Also the sealed plastic package, which contains the glue and the UV light (as one unit), was also undamaged. However, when I cut open the plastic package the glue poured out onto my hands. I quickly washed my hands but I still got a rash from this glue. The plastic package contains a folded small sheet of paper (8" X 6") which includes several warnings including a First Aid warning, all of which describe the glue as being a cancer and birth defect causing chemical which is a strong irritant that may require a physician's attention, and that it should be kept out of reach of children. The problem is that there is no possible way to know that the adhesive leaked out inside the plastic packaging until one opens it. The warning notation on the outside of the package is partially covered up by a product label which prevents it to be read. Apparently, the plastic cap that holds the adhesive inside the unit while it is still in its plastic package can easily become loose during shipping thus causing the adhesive to leak out. Yet there is no possible way to know that the adhesive leaked out as it is clear just like the plastic package. This is a very hazardous situation especially if a child opens the package as it is heavily advertised on TV. Personally, I think the product should be recalled and several safety measure should be introduced. One could be a stronger seal on the part of the unit that holds the adhesive. Another could be to make the adhesive a different color so that one knows that the adhesive leaked out during shipping. It would be a great public service if you could bring this to the public's attention. Sincerely [REDACTED]
This product is supposed to be used for repairs but it smells toxic and the fumes burn my skin and eyes. It caused hives all over my body which required hospitalization and an intense headache, nausea and chills. I checked the MSDS and the product labels and they actually don't match , which makes their information untrustworthy. I believe that due to the strong physical reactions i experienced from using this product, that this product is highly toxic and should not be for home use. This brands products should be recalled and all sales stopped immediately due to safety defect concerns. On top of everything else, their packaging isn't even child proof or state to keep out of the reach of children. A child could easily get into this product and eat it or get on their skin and become hospitalized or even worse.
The consumer purchased new carpet and laminate flooring in his home in April 2020. He has filed 5 separate reports on the 5 products installed since he had adverse health reactions to one of them, but has no way to prove which one it is. Within approximately 4 6 months after installation, the consumer began to experience adverse health symptoms. He first began to wake up with the skin around his eyes swollen. This started happening every night. This led to an intense burning sensation in the skin around the right eye. 10/2020: He developed intense coughing and wheezing, and his eye problem persisted at all times day and night, being worse in the morning after sleeping in the house. His vision went from 20/20 to 20/40 after the persistent swelling around his eyes caused trauma induced astigmatism, eventually forcing him to have to purchase corrective glasses. His symptoms improve when he is away from the home, meaning that the cause of the irritation is coming from within the house. He has to rinse his eyes before leaving the home or the burning sensation around his right eye will linger for hours. NOTE: He also had the home painted around the same time. The consumer contacted the paint manufacturer [REDACTED] and reported the problem to them. They sent him a list of ingredients (MSD Sheets). The paint company also paid for a home indoor air quality test. High levels of ethanol were discovered, but the company who conducted the testing, could not tell him where it was coming from. The paint company did however confirm that the paint products in question did not contain ethanol. The consumer contacted the flooring underlayment company-manufacturer, but they would not take responsibility for the matter and did not offer any assistance with resolving the matter. The consumer was repeatedly told that since he had numerous materials installed around the same time that none of the companies would admit even the possibility of their product being the cause of his health i
The fire marshall says a contractor was applying adhesive on roof with his assistant. The fire marshall says there was a static spark when the assistant heard a pop. when he turned around the roofing contractor applying the substrate was enguled in flames. The fire went out on its own. The fire marshall says that there were vapors hovering over the adhesive and the container was still enflamed. The fire marshall determined it was a "flash fire". The fire marshall says that based on his investigating the area, there was no other possible source of ignition. The consumer was not injured and did not need any medical attention. The contractor contacted the manufacturer's representative who offered no suggestions to resolve the issue with the can. the fire marshall believes that this product is mostly commercial but can be purchased by anyone.
Showing 8 of 22 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to adhesives on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are adhesives?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, adhesives have a danger score of 37/100 (low risk). An estimated 7,964 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from adhesives?
The most common injury is foreign body to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 33,566 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from adhesives increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for adhesives injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 27,384 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by adhesives?
Of all ER visits involving adhesives, approximately 1.9% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (98.1%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with adhesives?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 37/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 0-4 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.