CPSC NEISS · code 3219

Other Playground Equipment

Other Playground Equipment: danger rank #256 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #109 of 838 (22,654 estimated ER visits a year; declining by about 16% over the last five years).

Sports Protective Equipment & Gear CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Other Playground Equipment ranks #256 of 838 by danger score (38/100) at ER-volume #109 of 838 (22,654/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#256
danger rank of 838
#109
ER-volume rank of 838
38/100
danger score
22,654/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (38/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

38 Around the middle lower than 30% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 56/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 4 33rd 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 22,654 83rd 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -16% 41st 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 37 66th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 453,152 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 3219. Segments sum to 453,152 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Sports Protective Equipment & Gear group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Sports Protective Equipment & Gear danger scores

1. All Terrain Vehicles (# O…54/1002. Mopeds Or Power-assisted …54/1003. Exercise (activity Or App…48/1004. Snow Skiing (activity, Ap…47/1005. All Terrain Vehicles (fou…46/1006. Exercise Equipment45/1007. Tennis (activity, Apparel…44/1008. Other Playground Equipment38/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10038/100
PlainSafety danger score · Other Playground Equipment

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 38/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for other playground equipment - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 22,654 ER visits/yr High volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.5% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.03% Above-typical fatality rate
  • 5-year trend-16%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for other playground equipment are declining by about 16% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2018 (34,617 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (9,745 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 52,234 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the face (35,946 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 286,442 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.03%) result in fatality.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 37 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how other playground equipment fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

010K20K30K40K 20052008201120142017202020232024 30K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Other Playground Equipment, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 60,918 47,240 108,158
5-14 160,087 126,276 286,442
15-24 11,312 12,294 23,606
25-34 6,277 7,337 13,614
35-44 3,726 4,423 8,149
45-54 2,408 4,330 6,738
55-64 1,606 2,047 3,653
65-74 531 1,082 1,613
75+ 511 593 1,104

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Head Internal Injury 52,234
Face Laceration 35,946
Lower Arm Fracture 27,743
Ankle Strain, Sprain 17,676
Wrist Fracture 16,663
Head Laceration 16,612
Head Concussion 14,360
Face Contusions, Abr. 13,742
Elbow Fracture 11,760
Upper Arm Fracture 9,533
Lower Leg Fracture 8,886
Mouth Laceration 8,780
Head Contusions, Abr. 8,548
Upper Trunk Contusions, Abr. 7,195
Lower Trunk Other 6,042

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 95.2% (431,377)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 2.5% (11,161)
Treated And Transferred 1.2% (5,259)
Left Without Being Seen 0.9% (4,008)
Held For Observation 0.3% (1,205)
Fatality Incl. Doa, Died In Er 0.0% (142)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 9 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

9YOM FELL OFF THE MERRY GO ROUND AT SCHOOL TODAY NOW HAS A HEADACHE. SCRATCH TO FOREHEAD. DX CLOSED HEAD INJURY

Age 56 · Female · Lower Leg · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

56YOF HIT LEG WHILE ZIP LINING YESTERDAY, UNABLE TO BEAR WEIGHT, DX CONTUSION TO LEG, FALL

Age 10 · Male · Lower Arm · Fracture · 2024

10YOM PRESENTS AFTER HE FELL A FELL FEET OFF OF A ZIP LINE ONTO THE GROUND LANDING ON HIS RIGHT ARM AND HEARD AN IMMEDIATE CRACK IN HIS RIGHT FOREARM DX: FOREARM FRACTURE

Age 5 · Female · Mouth · Laceration · 2024

5YOF WAS SPINNING ON A MERRY-GO-ROUND AT THE PARK AND FELL OFF STRIKING FACE DX: LIP LACERATION

Age 10 · Male · Lower Trunk · Other · 2024

10YOM WAS JUMPING IN A BOUNCE HOUSE AT A BIRTHDAY PARTY AND DEVELOPED PAIN IN HIS RIGHT GROIN DX: RIGHT GROIN PAIN

Age 19 · Male · Head · Concussion · 2024

19YOM PRESENTS AFTER HITTING HIS HEAD ON THE SURFACE OF THE WATER 3 DAYS PRIOR WHILE ZIPLINING INTO THE WATER ON VACATION. DX: CONCUSSION

Age 34 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

34YOF, FELL FROM ZIP LINE THAT FAILED,ESTIMATED 3 FEET HEIGHT STRIKING HEAD WITHOUT LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS, DX: INJURY OF HEAD; LACERATION OF SCALP; CONTUSION OF LEFT CHEST WALL

Age 6 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2024

6YOM WAS RUNNING ON THE PLAYGROUND AND RAN INTO A POLE DX: LACERATION FACE

Age 7 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

7YOF FELL APPROXIMATELY 5 FEET OFF OF A *** ON THE PLAYGROUND LANDING ON HEAD DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY UPPER BACK PAIN

Age 3 · Male · Upper Arm · Fracture · 2024

3YOM WAS PLAYING ON A PIECE OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT IN THE SHAPE OF A CAR INSIDE THE MALL, HE FELL OFF THE CAR AND FELL ONTO LEFT HUMERUS DX: FRACTURED HUMERUS

Age 37 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

37YOM, WAS AT PLAYGROUND RUNNING WHEN ACCIDENTALLY STRUCK HEAD ON A METAL BAR, NO LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS OR BLOOD THINNER, DX: CLOSE HEAD INJURY; LACERATION OF SCALP

Age 6 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2024

6YOM WAS AT SCHOOL WHEN HE HIT CHIN ON A PLAYGROUND POLE. DX: CHIN LACERATION.

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/8/2025 · No Incident, No Injury · costway · Florida

I purchased a toddler playground set from Target online in November 2024. When my family set it up outdoors in March 2025, we discovered that the netting on the basketball hoop and soccer goal was disintegrating. The material breaks down into fine dust when touched or rubbed, releasing particles that can become airborne. The product is marketed as suitable for children, and the manufacturers Q&A states it can be used outdoors, but nowhere does it warn that the netting may deteriorate into dust. This creates a potential inhalation hazard, especially for young children with developing lungs. The playground was being used by a toddler for normal play activities (basketball/soccer goal). Although no injury has occurred yet, the risk of children inhaling synthetic fibers and dust from the netting is serious and could cause respiratory irritation or other health impacts.

9/7/2022 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · Karajen Corp · Oregon

To whom it may concern, I am a former education assistant of 7 years for [REDACTED] in the [REDACTED] area of [REDACTED]. I am writing to address a repeat-injury inducing piece of playground equipment known as “Gaga-Ball” https://www.gagaballpits.com/gaga-ball-pits/ During my 2nd year at [REDACTED] in 2017, school administration decided to have one of these wooden pits installed atop of rough-edged asphalt concrete. The objective of this game is to strike the ball below knee level, with the goal to hit the ball at other player’s legs to eliminate them from the game. The problem with this however, is that the students would strike their hands on the asphalt, creating disastrous hand injuries. These injuries were often very bloody and messy, requiring the school’s education assistants and office staff to tend to the injured player/student. I have informed [REDACTED] principal directly about the numerous incidents, letting her know that the game presents a major liability, and that the Ga-Ga Ball asphalt surface must be reinforced with a protective surface, such as rubber or [REDACTED] to reduce injury. The principal of [REDACTED], has chosen to do nothing. Their response to me was that installing rubber, or any other protective surface would be “too expensive”. If the protection of students is too expensive, then it seems logical that maybe the wooden octagon pit should be removed altogether. As school employees, we undergo bloodborne pathogen training modules at the start of every single school year. The conditions of the game, “Gaga-Ball” are unsuitable within the [REDACTED] district, as the game repeatedly exposes school employees to bloodborne pathogens through repeat ripped flesh injury. This incident(s) is among the primary reasons I decided to leave [REDACTED] last March. I recommend [REDACTED]’s GaGa-Ball pits be investigated for safety hazard. I am perturbed [REDACTED] school district administration continually ignores the

9/14/2023 · Incident, No Injury · CedarWorks Playsets · South Carolina

It was mentioned in [REDACTED] group that someone had purchased a CedarWorks indoor playset on [REDACTED]. She was asking how to secure the blue 'balls' which are found on top of the indoor play sets. It was told to her in the comments that they are a strangulation hazard which is why they are no longer allowed on cribs. A necklace, hood, shirt, cape etc could get caught and the child could suffocate. The units are currently for sale on their website.

8/22/2023 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · Shenzhen Topyou Network Technology Co., Ltd. · United States

We bought a foldable ball pit thinking it was safe for children. My 1 year old daughter was playing around the ball pit, fell and landed on the top edge of the ball pit. Her whole cheek was red and was left with a horizontal bruise on her cheek

8/21/2025 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · SOFT PLAY LLC · Massachusetts

On May 17, 2025, a six-year-old girl was playing at the McDonalds at 32 Broadway in Norwood, MA, in what appears to have been a McDonalds Play-Place. The child fell off of a rolling cylinder which was part of what appears to be a kid conveyor, manufactured by Soft Play, onto her shoulder. The rolling cylinder, shaped like the Soft Play log roll and composed of a synthetic material, was turquoise in color, and was horizontally suspended off the ground. The surface the child fell onto had no padding. She was in extreme pain and later learned that she had fractured her clavicle. She was treated at [REDACTED]. The play equipment that injured the child was a turquoise, synthetic, mounted roller shaped like a cylinder or barrel suspended off the ground, believed to be a kid conveyor in the McDonald's Play-Place, and believed to have been manufactured for McDonald's by Soft Play. A six-year-old would not be able to traverse over this piece of Play-Place equipment without going on top of it and climbing over it. Because the equipment would spin, a child climbing over could be spun off the equipment and fall off. The surface below this piece of play equipment had no protective padding so there was nothing to mitigate the bodily damage sustained if a child fell. The equipment is blatantly dangerous and cannot be safely used by children, and there are no padding or soft landing precautions in place for when a child inevitably falls from the equipment. McDonald's did not post any signage to warn parents of the dangers of this piece of play equipment and did not supervise those using the product. The actions of McDonald's and the design of Soft Play resulted in the serious injury of a six-year-old child. McDonalds was informed of this serious injury the same day it occurred. They provided slow communication with the parent of the victim; taking a long time to file a report in their internal system. Under section 15(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act, McDonald

8/20/2013 · Incident, No Injury · QUIKRETE (The Quikrete Companies) · United States

I purchased 11 bags of Quickcrete Play Sand to make a sand box for some children that are staying at my house for a week.I bought Play Sand because I have had a good experience with it in the past in similar situations. My concern is that there were quite a few angular, sharp pieces of some white rock uniformly spread throughout the ten bags I used. They are fairly large (20 to 40mm) and seem like they could be a seriously problem with toddlers. I still have one bag left that I will keep closed and have kept the pieces I was able to strain out of the sand.

8/1/2011 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, INC. · California

a nine-year old boy was playing on the "Spring Across Bridge," manufactured by Landscape Structures Incorporated, when he fell. The Spring Across Bridge has thick metal coils that are connected to several relatively narrow metal beams, causing the Bridge to toggle back and forth in different areas when children walk or run along it. There is no housing unit or covering in place where the round coil meets the square beam, leaving the four metal corners of each beam exposed. This appears to be the intentional design of Landscape Structures, rather than an alteration by a user or consumer, although this is not certain. When the nine year old boy fell, his shin hit the exposed upper corners of the metal beam, causing a large V-shaped laceration. one of the arms of the "V" was approximately 4 centimeters long and the other arm was about 3 centimeters long. The laceration was so deep, a chunk of flesh and muscle tissue was torn off.

7/13/2020 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · Play & Park Structures · Missouri

My 5 year old son was playing on the playground, walking on a playground piece that connects two parts of the playground. There was a metal bar across the top of the walkway where it connects to the playground that matches the color of the playground and is thin. My son did not see the bar and went face first into it, knocking his front teeth loose. I believe this bar should at minimum be a contrasting color and more ideally a plastic surround around the bar. It was also below his line of sight when walking.

Showing 8 of 37 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to other playground equipment on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Sports Protective Equipment & Gear

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Other Playground Equipment: cross-group products nearest on danger score (38/100), estimated annual ER visits (22,654/yr), and hospitalization share (3.5%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Other Playground Equipment ranks #256 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #109 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does other playground equipment rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, other playground equipment ranks #256 by PlainSafety danger score (38/100) and #109 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (22,654/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from other playground equipment?

The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 52,234 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from other playground equipment increasing or decreasing?

Down 16% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for other playground equipment injuries?

The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 286,442 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by other playground equipment?

Of all ER visits involving other playground equipment, approximately 3.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with other playground equipment?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Other Playground Equipment is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.