Metal Polishes, Tarnish Removers Or Preventatives

59YOM PRESENTS WITH HYPERTENSION WITH FACIAL TINGLING AND LEFT HAND TINGLING. PATIENT REPORTS THAT YESTERDAY AFTERNOON HE WAS SPRAYING CAMPHOR IN AN ENCLOSED SPACE WHICH GAVE HIM A LITTLE TROUBLE BREATHING. HE WOKE TODAY WITH THE NEW SYMPTOMS. DX: ELEVATED BLOOD PRESSURE, PARESTHESIA, EXPOSURE CHEMICAL INHALED, HYPONATREMIA.

49YOM WAS POLISHING AN IRON WHILE WEARING SAFETY GOGGLES AND SOMETHING GOT IN HIS LEFT EYE DX: FOREIGN BODY EYE

60YOF BIBEMS FOR CHEMICAL SPLASH INJURY TO THE EYES. PT STATES SHE WAS CLEANING WITH NOXON METAL CLEANER WHEN IT SPLASHED GETTING ON HER EYES AND PERIORBITAL REGION. PT HAS CONJUNCTIVAL INJECTION IN EYES DX: CHEMICAL EXPOSURE OF EYE

12MOM PRESENTS AFTER HE WAS FOUND PLAYING WITH SILVER CLEANER, ALL OVER BODY, UNKNOWN INGESTION. DX: ACCIDENTAL INGESTION OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE

18MOM APPROX 30 MINS AGO, PT WAS HOLDING BOTTLE OF GUN BORE CLEANER. MOM STATES BOTTLE WAS CLOSED, HOWEVER, MOM COULD SMELL THE CLEANER ON PT'S MOUTH AND PT'S HANDS. DX: HYDROCARBON INGESTION

54YOF PRESENTS WITH CONCERNS OF MORE CONFUSION WITH BRIEF EPISODES OF INABILITY TO NAME THE DATE OR WHERE SHE IS, PROVIDER BELIEVES THAT HER ANTIPSYCHOTICS (*** INJECTIONS AND *** AND *** TABLETS) ARE CONTRIBUTING TO HER MORE LETHARGIC STATE WHICH HAS BEEN PRESENT FOR A WHILE DX: DROOLING-MEDICATION INDUCED

27YOF ACCIDENTALLY SPRAYED HER EYES WITH STAINLESS STEEL CLEANER 2 DAYS AGO. DX: CORNEAL ABRASION,BILATERAL

23mof rubbbed *** *** *** on legs and abdomen. DX: chemical exposure of skin.

30YOM PT POLISHING METAL & SPLINTER GOT INTO LT EYE NO DX #

75YOM C/O FALL, -LOC. PT FOUND TO HAVE CONTUSION & CHRONIC SAH. PT IS CURRENTLY ON ***. DX: FALL, FEVER, SDH

11MOF PRESENTS WITH CAMPHOR EXPOSURE. MOTHER WAS USING AS INSECT/RODENT PREVENTION WHEN PT SCOOPED ITEM OFF GROUND AND PUT IT IN HER MOUTH. DX: CHLORINATED CAMPHENE, TOXICITY, ACCIDENTAL OR UNINTENTIONAL. %

4YOF presents with accidental substance ingestion; patient was with grandmother who just moved into new home; grandmother reports having a small amount of metal polish (***) in an unlabeled water bottle--patient grabbed bottle and tried to drink it, but spit out most of the content; initially complained of abdominal pain DX: Ingestion of Toxin, Accidental or Unintentional *

Hi. I purchased some Twinkle Copper cleaner from Amazon and the product was done sort of Acid that turned my copper pots and pans black. When I called amazon to report it they gave me a fake reference number which is how many of these on line companies operate to rid themselves of complaints. And the there’s no record of anything. Amazon brought down small businesses throughout the Usa and should be antitrusted — while that billionaire [REDACTED] photographs his penis to disseminate on line — deviant exploiter. Update: This product Twinkle Copper Cleaner from Amazon is counterfeit and tampered with. It caused me a rash on my hands which spread to my arm. It turned my copper pots BLACK and ruined them. I tried to report it to amazon but they were not interested and gave me a fake case number. I wish to file a claim for the damage. I’m taking a cortisone series for the allergic reaction. And I want my copper pots and pans restored. Here are photos of the product and the product reaction on my arm—I has sent photos earlier of my damaged kitchen copper pots and pans in question. I’m keeping the product for your examination but I cannot touch it because it causes me to break out as in photo below. I need the number for Amazon’s lawyer and liability insurance. What I said about [REDACTED] may not be agreeable for the politically correct but it is true. He’s an exhibitionist who exploits his workers to get rich and who Gad destroyed small businesses in out country by controlling the market as a monopoly. He needs to be antitrusted. Please change my report accordingly, confirm receipt and please advice. Thank you so much. [REDACTED]

A 3-year-old boy died shortly after ingesting a poisonous substance, specifically Pro Par Brightener, a compound containing sulfuric acid, hydrofluoric acid and ethanol, that is used as an industrial aluminum and metal cleaner. The child gained access to the substance while the family vehicle was stopped at a car wash. He and his 5-year-old brother were in their car seats in the back of the vehicle, while his parents were in the front. He worked his way out of his car seat and grabbed a 12 oz. plastic water bottle that was on the floor and where his father had stored the chemical substance. He drank approximately one third of its content and began to feel sick. When his parents realized what he had done they made the child drink water and called EMS for help. He was rushed to a hospital emergency room where he was treated but he was already unresponsive.

The consumer stated that when she opened up the container, a small amount of the product flew into the air. The consumer stated that the powder got into her nose, throat and mouth. The consumer stated that the powder is very fine. The consumer stated that she has been having difficulty breathing since then. The consumer has to take extra breathing medications. The consumer also feels burning/stinging down into her lungs and chest. The consumer stated that she contacted the manf. The consumer inquired about the return policy. They informed her that they can provide her a rebate of $5 or she can receive a refund of the product cost ($10) if she pays to ship the product back to them. The consumer will take a rebate of $5.

I purchased a dangerous product for cleaning that is extremely flammable and I believe poisonous but no marking but a small area that says flammable but does not state poisonous. The liquid went on fire extremely quickly. If denatured alcohol or isopropyl it is poisonous. It also states

1. The time of product use was probably more in-line with 15 minutes, not 5. 2. In addition to the injuries contained in the report, areas also affected include: *shins & calves of both legs *both forearms *right wrist *inside of right ring finger, which occurred while simply inspecting the bottle label 3. The pH test strips used were a product of MedLab www.medlabdiagnostics.org . The strips, when immersed in the WJ Haggerty & Sons cleaning solution instantaneously indicated the maximum pH reading of 9.0, although that products instructions specify that it is intended only for urine and saliva. 4. The referenced cream actually used “[REDACTED], not “[REDACTED]”. 5. No immediate medical attention or first aid was received, other than thoroughly washing the areas that I believed had been exposed. While the [REDACTED] had some positive affect on the chemical burns, I already had an annual visit scheduled with my dermatologist for October 24th ([REDACTED]). [REDACTED] also concurred that it appeared the injuries were wide-spread probably caused by a reaction to the cleaning fluid, and would best be treated internally, rather than using an external cream or lotion. He then prescribed a treatment using [REDACTED] tablets, ending on Nov.6, 2019. To date, this has somewhat mitigated, but not eliminatedthe appearance of the burns. 6. I have attached a photograph of the bottle label, and will be contacting the manufacturer next week. The distributor, Amazon, declined to accept the bottle for return to the manufacturer. It is my understanding that their refusal was due to safey concerns, but they did refund the purchase price. I will retain the bottle and fluid, until this matter is resolved. However, I am very cautious when handling that bottle, as liquid seems to drip, unexpectedly causing additional burns. Regarding my previous report, I have the following new information to amend my report: · I had 4 ounces of this cleaning solution tested by an independent