Juicers
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Kitchen Cooking Appliances · CPSC Code 271
Down 25% over 5 years
The verdict
Juicers carry a danger score of 27/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 196 ER-treated injuries a year that are declining by about 25% over the last five years.
- 27/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 196
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 5.1%
- end in hospital admission
- 0-4
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 271 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 27/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for juicers - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume196 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)5.1%
- Fatality rate0.00%
- 5-year trend-25%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Juicers (CPSC product code 271, in the Kitchen Cooking Appliances category) generate an estimated 196 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 3,919 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 27/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are declining by about 25% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2016 (457 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2023 (23 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for juicers is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,972 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by amputation to the finger (282 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 850 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 5.1% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 21 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how juicers fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 607 | 243 | |
| 5-14 | 277 | 282 | |
| 15-24 | 110 | 30 | |
| 25-34 | 51 | 496 | |
| 35-44 | 18 | 416 | |
| 45-54 | 50 | 312 | |
| 55-64 | 195 | 634 | |
| 65-74 | 15 | 132 | |
| 75+ | 34 | 16 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Finger | Amputation | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Finger | Avulsion | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Finger | Other | |
| Toe | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Face | Burn, Scald | |
| Shoulder | Other | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Neck | Laceration | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration | |
| Toe | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
22 MOM HAD A JUICER FALL ON FOOT AND TOE DX: CONTUSION TOE PAIN FOOT
7YOM GOT FINGER CAUGHT IN A CIDER PRESS. DX: FINGER FX
38YOF PATIENT WAS USING A JUICER IN THE KITCHEN AT HOME WHEN HER INDEX FINGER BECAME ENTRAPPED DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT INDEX FINGER WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY WITH DAMAGE TO NAIL
49YOF PRESENTS TO THE ED WITH LACERATION OF THE LEFT POINTER FINGER. PATIENT WAS USING A JUICER WHEN HER FINGER GOT CAUGHT IN THE MACHINE. DX: FINGER LAC
27YOM WITHI FINGER CAUGHT IN A JUICER DX: FINGER INJURY
5 YOM LIKELY CUT HIS FINGER ON THE JUICE MAKER THIS MORNING. DX: NAIL AVULSION FINGER, COMPLICATED LACERATION OF FINGER
32YOF WAS USING A JUICER WHEN SHE CUT HER LEFT INDEX AND MIDDLE FINGERS DX: LACERATION FINGERS
70YOF PRESENTED WITH LACS TO THE 1ST-3RD FINGERS ON THE LT HAND AFTER GETTING HER HAND CAUGHT IN A JUICER. THE PT ELFT WITHOUT BEING SEEN. NO DX
21MOM- PER MOM SHE WAS WASHING DISHES WHILE HOLDING PT THE PT GRABBED THE JUICE MACHINE LID THAT WAS THE BLADE PT THEN ACCIDENTALLY CUT RIGHT WRIST. DX: RIGHT WRIST LACERATION.
30 YOF WAS ATTEMPTING TO PLUG IN A MACHINE TO MAKE JUICE WITH RIGHT HAND WHEN SHE NOTICED AN ELECTRIC SHOCK WHEN SHE WAS NEAR THE OUTLET.DX: LACERATION RIGHT HAND, ELECTROCUTION AND NONFATAL EFFECTS OF ELECTRIC CURRENT
76YOM, PERSISTENT H/A SINCE GOT STRUCK TO HEAD WITH ?JUICER 5 DAYS AGO DX: CONCUSSION WITHOUT LOC
55YOF WITH LACERATION TO RIGHT INDEX FINGER THAT OCCURRED TODAY AFTER PUTTING FINGER IN ELECTRIC JUICER MACHINE. DX: NEAR AMPUTATION RIGHT INDEX FINGER
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
The consumer indicates that he placed fruits in his juicer and roughly three seconds after he turned it on the unit exploded. The consumer received a laceration about 0.25 long on his left arm, as well as a headache that finally went away the next day. The consumer contacted the Manufacturer and explained the situation; the representative he spoke to offered him a 25.00$ coupon which the consumer is not satisfied with. The consumer was also asked to sign a legal form however he will not be doing so. The consumer states that the juicer is used approximately once a month. The consumer plans on keeping the juicer for at least the next thirty days in case an investigation ensues.
8/8/2022: The consumer noticed pieces of black particles in the pulp thats separated from the fruit, when juice is made. When she cleaned the pulp, there were pieces of black plastic present. There is a wheel that spins in the juicer and some of the plastic pieces broke off of it as well. The plastic broke away on the support housing of this container. The consumer has been consuming plastic shavings for an unknown length of time and she is concerned about the potential health effects down the line. The consumer contacted the manufacturer and said that their representative blamed the issue on the way the consumer cared for the product. However, after some back and forth, with several calls, the manufacturer agreed to provide a full refund for the product. The consumer is also concerned about others that may have been exposed to this issue. The juicer has an Intertek Number: [REDACTED]
( I filed this report originally on 3/31/2011, but I don't believe it was fully processed). On 2/27/2011, I was using the Aroma ACJ-250 juicer extractor when it exploded with a "boom". The light fixture above my head was shattered and fell onto me. Sharp plastic and shredded metal shrapnel shot out in all directions, traveling 20 feet to my left and 15 feet to my right. The walls of the rooms were what contained the debris from traveling further. My left hand was lacerated and my chest bruised from the force of the explosion. Fruit juice and skin from my juicing efforts splattered and stained the ceiling, walls, cabinets, floor, my face clothing, body, everything I had on the counter and the rug in the adjoining room. Basically, the entire kitchen was a stained mess. It was a very traumatic event which stays with me. I am SO fortunate my face wasn't over the juicer and that I did not lose an eye or sustain life threatening injuries. I am relieved that my 10 year old son, who was helping me juice prior to the event had left the room and that no one else in our household or our pets got in the line of the trajectory pieces of shrapnel. I found pieces of shrapnel for weeks after cleaning up on that day. This was no way for me to have started my birthday. My present in this is that I didn't get more seriously injured, but the "what ifs" haunt me. My husband looked on line and found out this product had been recalled many years back, though that message did not reach me. Since then, I learned that the company had no notification in service to alert consumers. I have called Aroma housewares 5 times and left detailed messages with their legal department to discuss what happened to me, but they have never returned the call.
I've had my Juice Machine by Mr. Coffee for several years and decided to use it, as I had some small [REDACTED] grapes and wanted to get some juice to make jelly. I put less than 1/8 a cup of fresh grapes in it, plugged it in, turned it on, and POW! The machine exploded while it was still plugged in. The base was flipping around on the counter; the round top & metal base blade were spinning; large & tiny chunks of plastic were hurled throughout my kitchen, into the dining room, and down the hall into the utility room! It finally unplugged itself from the wall when the base fell to the floor. It is a miracle my eyesight was not taken from me. For several hours after it happened, I had a loud hum in my ears that turned into sounding like I was under water. Now, I just have an extremely high pitched constant sound. I have had some tinnitus in the past, and it kind of sounds like that only much higher. I took a bath to remove all the tiny pieces of plastic stuck to my face, neck, and body and washed my eyes with an eye rinse. I'm still finding tiny little pieces of plastic on my neck, face, and arms. On Monday, I may go to see my eye doctor to make sure nothing is still in my eyes. I have no idea what caused it to do what it did. I have owned many Mr. Coffee products and have always been very happy with them.
Caller stated that while using the juicer the end cap on the unit broke and became a projectile across the room. Caller stated that fortunately her granddaughter was not present because the impact would have caused serious injuries to the child. The manufacturer was contacted and they informed her that they would send a replacement part but the part was on back order for 8 weeks. Caller feels that this juicer is a safety hazard and should be recalled before someone is seriously hurt.
NOTE: The details in this report was transferred from faxes and emails that the consumer sent to CPSC. The consumer said that he experienced the problem stated in the CPSC Recall# 23-213 and other problems as well. In light of the problems, he discontinued use of the juicer in early 2022. He contacted the manufacturer numerous times, but they would not provide a refund as he requested. The consumer claims that he contacted the manufacturer after the recall was issued (6/1/2023), but they still would not provide a refund or assist him in the manner he preferred. The consumer wrote: "I had both issues mentioned in the recall plus other issues this is the same excuses you did before, that's why I've also asked the attorney general office to investigate you for making bull excuses to not pay my refund. Stop making crappy reasons you need to be sued as well for the crappy business refund practices you have. I am working on that with a senator and news media against your crappy outfit of a company." I had problem with juicer in [ILLEGIBLE]. I notified company, got the runaround. So after a few attempts I stopped using juicer after [ILLEGIBLE] months.
The consumer indicates that she turned her juicer on to high speed and added celery in it. Less than one minute later, the unit exploded and the metal mesh inside it broke off and hit her in her stomach, making a one-inch laceration. The consumer notes that had it not been for the waist trainer she was wearing, her laceration would have been much deeper and bigger. The consumer contacted the Manufacturer and explained the situation; the representative she spoke to informed her that they would escalate her complaint to the Supervisor. The consumer states that the unit was used two to three times per month. The consumer plans on keeping her unit for at least the next thirty days in case an investigation ensues.
I was using the brand new Breville BJE510XL Juice Fountain Multi-speed juicer. This was the first time that I had used it. I read all the directions, unpacked, cleaned and assembled it before the first run. There were no left over packing parts. Everything was seated correctly and the safety arm was in place. I was juicing ginger root which has about the same consistency as carrots so the machine was set on 5. Initially, I was not at all impressed with how much juice was coming from the juicer. I was using it 4-5 minutes when my wife said she smelled electrical burning. She was about 10 feet away in back of the juicer. At that time, the warning E did not appear on the LED screen. I stopped the juicer, refitted the parts. I did not smell any electrical burning smell anywhere around the juicer. I believed she smelled the ginger. I started it up again, and within half to one minute, my wife said the juicer sounded as if it were straining. As I was looking down to the LED screen again to check, the plastic filter bowl exploded with an extremely loud noise, showering me on the chest and abdomen and about a third of the kitchen with plastic shards, wire mesh shards and ginger pulp. It was fortunate that the juicer was on a low counter so my eyes were not level with the filter bowl. I sorted through the debris and collected as many pieces as I could find as well as spent 45 minutes cleaning walls, cabinets, and large appliances that were in the direct line of the explosion. I searched carefully through the pulp container and all of the dispersed pulp looking for any possible foreign body that might have been in the ginger but found no hard or metal objects other than the remnants of the micro mesh filter basket. To say the least, under the wrong circumstances, the explosion could have blinded me or caused facial damage, not to mention that the sound scared the hell out of both of us. I have reported this to the Consumer Product Safety even though you said tha
Showing 8 of 21 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to juicers on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are juicers?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, juicers have a danger score of 27/100 (low risk). An estimated 196 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from juicers?
The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,972 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from juicers increasing or decreasing?
Down 25% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for juicers injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 850 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by juicers?
Of all ER visits involving juicers, approximately 5.1% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (94.9%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with juicers?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Kitchen Cooking Appliances
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 27/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 0-4 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.