Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Matches, Not Specified ranks #137 of 838 by danger score (41/100) at ER-volume #565 of 838 (702/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #137
- danger rank of 838
- #565
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 41/100
- danger score
- 702/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (41/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
41 Higher than most more dangerous than 79% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 53/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 23 | 95th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 702 | 29th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -17% | 40th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 3 | 28th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 14,043 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1731. Segments sum to 14,043 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Medical & Assistance Devices group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Medical & Assistance Devices danger scores
How this 41/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for matches, not specified - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 702 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 18.9% Very high admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.40% Elevated fatality rate
- 5-year trend-17%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for matches, not specified are declining by about 17% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2005 (1,514 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2023 (273 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is burns, thermal to the face, accounting for approximately 3,142 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by burns, thermal to the hand (1,409 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 2,623 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 18.9% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.40%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 3 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how matches, not specified fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 424 | 390 | |
| 5-14 | 2,323 | 300 | |
| 15-24 | 1,476 | 809 | |
| 25-34 | 1,358 | 819 | |
| 35-44 | 606 | 857 | |
| 45-54 | 1,312 | 694 | |
| 55-64 | 685 | 532 | |
| 65-74 | 565 | 291 | |
| 75+ | 198 | 406 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Face | Burns, Thermal | |
| Hand | Burns, Thermal | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Ear | Foreign Body | |
| Lower Arm | Burns, Thermal | |
| All Parts Body | Anoxia | |
| Lower Leg | Burns, Thermal | |
| Upper Trunk | Burns, Thermal | |
| Eyeball | Burns, Thermal | |
| Finger | Burns, Thermal | |
| Ear | Other | |
| Eyeball | Foreign Body | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Foot | Foreign Body | |
| Ear | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
55 YOM ACCIDENTALLY LIT A ROLL OF GAUZE THAT WAS WRAPPING HIS LEFT FOOT ON FIRE WITH A DROPPED MATCH FROM A CIGARETTE APPROXIMATELY 3 DAYS AGO. +FD. DX: PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN LEFT LOWER LEG, ABRASION LEFT LESSER TOES. PT LEFT AMA.
46YOM HAS HX OF SCHIZOPHRENIA, BIPOLAR, COMES TO ER W FATHER HE TELLS THE DR A COUPLE DAYS AGO HE LIT A MATCH AND THINKS RESIDUE GOT INTO EYE. EYE CHECKED BY DR LOOKED AT HIS EYE UNDER SLIT LAMP AND BLUE LIGHT EYE IS OK, DAD IA WORRIED HIS SON IS NOT TAKING HIS MEDS RIGHT. . DX PSYCHOSIS.
10YOM WAS LIGHTING A MATCH AND THE SPARK FROM THE MATCH WENT INTO HIS LEFT EYE DX: CORNEAL ABRASION
16YOF WAS RUNNING BAREFOOT AND STEPPED ON A MATCH STICK RETAINING IT IN HER FOOT DX: FOREIGN BODY FOOT *
14 YOM C/O BURN TO LOWER LEG AND HAND AND FOREARM S/P WAS OUTSIDE AND LIT A PILE OF LEAVES ON FIRE WITH A MATCH AFTER POURING GASOLINE AND PATIENT WAS BURNED BY THE FLAMES. IT IS NOT STATED IF FIRE DEPARTMENT ATTENDED. DX: BURN OF LOWER LEG; HAND AND FOREARM
57 YOM LIT A MATCH TO LIGHT CIGARETTE WHICH IGNITED AEROSOLIZED BUTANE TRAPPED IN TRAILER AND HIS TRAILER EXPLODED. THERE WAS A FATALITY OF BOTH HIS FEMALE COMPANION AND HIS DOG RELATED TO THIS. FD NSDX: FACIAL BURN SECOND DEGREE
15YOM - PT ARRIVES PER POV WITH C/O FACIAL BURNS. HE REPORTS WHILE STARTING A FIRE, HE THREW A MATCH IN WHICH PRODUCED A FIREBALL IN HIS FACE. HE HAS SINGED HAIR. DX: BURN OF FACE, SECOND DEGREE
9YOM BROTHER WAS PLAYING WITH A BURNED OUT MATCH AND HIT PT IN HIS EYE. DX FACE BURN
82 YOF C/O BURN TO FACE AND BURN TO EAR S/P WAS WEARING HER OXYGEN EQUIPMENT AT HOME AND SHE LIT A MATCH AND FLAMES BURNED HER FACE AND EAR. IT IS NOT STATED IF FIRE DEPARTMENT ATTENDED. DX: FULL THICKNESS BURN OF FACE; BURN OF EAR
50YOM WITH FACIAL AND NASAL BURNS AFTER CATCHING NASAL CANNULA WITH OXYGEN ON FIRE WHEN LIGHTING A MATCH UNKNOWN IF FD AT THE SCENE DX: < 1%TBSA TO FACE, INHALATION INJURY
81 YOF REPORTS LAST NIGHT, LIGHTING A CIGARETTE WITH A MATCH, LOST CONTROL OF THE MATCH AND IT LANDED ON HER HEAD SETTING HER HEAD ON FIRE. + MULTIPLE BURNS TO SCALP VARYING FROM SUPERFICIAL PARTIAL TO DEEP PARTIAL. TRANSFERRED TO BURN CENTER. DX: BURNS FIRE DEPT UNK
75 YOM THINKS HE HE LIT A MATCH ONTO HIS LEFT MEDIAL THIGH AND SUSTAINED BURNS, BUT DOES NOT RECALL EXACTLY HOW OR WHEN THIS HAPPENED. NO FDDX: BURN
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
GOODCO! Kitchen Matches, "safety matches", are not safe. When striking matches on side of box often part of the tip of the match stays on the, striker strip. Also the tip sends several sparks out. I have a carpeted bathroom and poured water on four spots the first time that happened, three spots the second time, to be sure nothing would smoulder. Now I strike the matches over the basin. But, when I blow out the match the same thing happens -- sparks fly. So I blow them out over the basin. I am on my second box of matches and the above happens about every third match. These matches are unsafe and I do not think they should be sold until the manufacturer solves this problem!
Swan Creek Candle gives you matches when you buy their candles the tops of the matches fly off when lit one landed on my carpet and burnt a hole in it. 1) Approximately, how large was the hole that was burned in your carpet? I sent a photo about 1 across 2) How did you put the flame out or did it die out by itself? I put it out by stepping on it 3) How long would you estimate that the flame lasted (5 seconds, 10 seconds or more)? 5 seconds 4) Were these paper matches or the wooden stick like matches? Wooden must be dry the heads fly off this isnt the first time usually use them in the room with tile floor this time it caught the kitchen carpet on fire. 5) Was this the very first match that you used or had you used some of the matches previously, without any incident? First match one of yours 6) Lastly, were there any warnings or precautions on the products packaging? No I sent the box and the match back to you. Did you receive it?
I believe Penley Kitchen Matches are unsafe because: 1. The matches break while striking (or trying to strike) 2. The matches frequently do not light when striking the appropriate place on the box These are clearly substandard in relation to other kitchen matches I have used in the past and to the ones I have now purchased for future use.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to matches, not specified on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Medical & Assistance Devices
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Matches, Not Specified: cross-group products nearest on danger score (41/100), estimated annual ER visits (702/yr), and hospitalization share (18.9%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Medical & Assistance Devices
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Matches, Not Specified ranks #137 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #565 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does matches, not specified rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, matches, not specified ranks #137 by PlainSafety danger score (41/100) and #565 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (702/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from matches, not specified?
The most common injury is burns, thermal to the face, accounting for approximately 3,142 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from matches, not specified increasing or decreasing?
Down 17% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for matches, not specified injuries?
The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 2,623 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by matches, not specified?
Of all ER visits involving matches, not specified, approximately 18.9% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (81.1%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with matches, not specified?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.