Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Laundry Soaps Or Detergents ranks #370 of 838 by danger score (36/100) at ER-volume #130 of 838 (17,950/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #370
- danger rank of 838
- #130
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 36/100
- danger score
- 17,950/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (36/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
36 Around the middle lower than 44% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 50/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 2 | 12th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 17,950 | 80th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -23% | 31st | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 118 | 84th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 359,017 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 949. Segments sum to 359,017 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Workshop Tools & Equipment danger scores
How this 36/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for laundry soaps or detergents - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 17,950 ER visits/yr High volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 1.8% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-23%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for laundry soaps or detergents are declining by about 23% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2017 (28,797 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2006 (7,357 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is derma/conjunct to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 74,459 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by poisoning to the all parts body (56,887 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 120,011 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 1.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 118 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how laundry soaps or detergents fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 63,084 | 56,927 | |
| 5-14 | 23,765 | 20,572 | |
| 15-24 | 17,926 | 30,191 | |
| 25-34 | 16,125 | 28,252 | |
| 35-44 | 13,289 | 19,165 | |
| 45-54 | 10,834 | 18,242 | |
| 55-64 | 7,464 | 13,192 | |
| 65-74 | 4,477 | 7,210 | |
| 75+ | 2,571 | 5,700 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| All Parts Body | Derma/conjunct | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Upper Trunk | Derma/conjunct | |
| Not Stated/unk | Derma/conjunct | |
| Lower Arm | Derma/conjunct | |
| Lower Trunk | Derma/conjunct | |
| Face | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Burn, Chemical | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Lower Leg | Derma/conjunct | |
| Neck | Derma/conjunct | |
| Upper Leg | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| All Parts Body | Other |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
3 YOM PRESENTS WITH FB IN THE EYE. CHILD SQUIRTED A *** POD IN HIS R EYE AT HOME. MOM IMMEDIATELY FLUSHED EYES WITH TAP WATER. CHILD STILL STATES THAT HIS EYE HURTS. DX: INJURY OF THE CONJUNCTIVA AND CORNEAL ABRASION OF R EYE W/O FB.
64YOF PRESENT WITH ITCHING AND ERYTHEMA TO EYES AND FOREHEAD AFTER CHANGING TO A NEW BRAND OF LAUNDRY DETERGENT DX: MINOR ALLERGIC REACTION
38YOF WALKED IN TO ED WITH CHIEF COMPLAINT OF URTICARIA TO LEGS, BACK, AND FACE X3 WEEKS AFTER USING *** LAUNDRY DETERGENT. PATIENT REPORTS FACIAL SWELLING. DX:ALLERGIC REACTION.
63YOM PATIENT RECENTLY CHANGED LAUNDRY DETERGENT, DEVELOPED RASH WITH PETECHIAE DX: ALLERGIC DERMATITIS DUE TO OTHER CHEMICAL PRODUCT, PETECHIAL RASH
8YOF MOM SWITCHED BRANDS OF LAUNDRY DETERGENT AND DEVELOPED RASH ALL OVER BODY DX:CONTACT DERMATITIS DUE TO DETERGENTS
11YOF TO ER PMHX FOR BRAIN TUMOR, CP & TOURETTE SYNDROME, PT ER ER W/ FULL BODY RASH, MOM SAYS MAY HAVE CHANGED LAUNDRY DETERGENTS, RASHPRURITIC IN NATURE, TEMPORARILY RELIEVED W/ ***, THEN RETURNS, PT HAS HAD FOR 3 DAYS DX RASH
2YOM PATIENT CURRENTLY LIVES IN A REFUGEE CENTER, HE WAS SITTING NEXT TO A BAG OF DAILY RATIONS THAT INCLUDED A *** POD AND HE INGESTED IT. MOM GAVE HIM JUICE RIGHT AFTERWARD AND HE HAD A LARGE EPISODE OF EMESIS. DX: INGESTION OF TOXIN
59YOM C/O ALL BODY RASH S/P PT STATES HIS SYMPTOMS BEGAN AFER USING SOMEBODY ELSE'S LAUNDRY DETERGENT AT THE LAUNDROMAT. WHICH WAS USED ON THIS CLOTHING AND BED SHEETS TO LAUNDER WITH. DX: RASH
23YOF BROKE OUT IN RASH AFTER USING NEW LAUNDRY DETERGENT. DX RASH TO UPPER TRUNK
50YOM BROKE OUT IN RASH FROM USING A NEW SCENT BOOSTER IN HIS LAUNDRY DETERGENT. DX: DERMATITIS TO LEGS, ARMS, BACK AND FACE.
2YOM BIT INTO A *** POD NOW MOUTH IS BURNING DX: INGESTION OF FOREIGN MATERIAL
13MOF CHANGED BRANDS OF LAUNDRY DETERGENT AND DEVELOPED A RASH TO CHEST DX: URTICARIA
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
I purchased Tide Pods at Target after wearing the clothes I washed with the product I developed a severe rash on my thighs and under my breasts the itching was unbearable and was starting to blister after contacting my doctor I had an appt. on Friday the 30 then spent the entire afternoon being treated for a severe allergic reaction the only thing I had been using was the Tide Pods I was given a prescription for a cream that I have to apply twice a day for 10 days. I have not been able to any activities for over 2 weeks and the pain and itching are still very painful even with the cream.
On Tues Sept 22, my son complained of some itching and broke out in a few hives. By Wednesday morning they were all over his back and chest. Wed. I took him to the doctor and was sent home with a [REDACTED] plan. Wednesday afternoon the hives cleared up. Then Thursday night they cam back with a venegence. They were all over his back, chest, stomach, and we're moving down his arms and legs. We talked to a 24 hour nurse and ended up in the ER. He received a steroid IV. They also sent him home with an epi pen because this reaction was so severe they expected the next time to be much worse. We have been racking our brains trying to figure out what caused the reaction. Then tonight I noticed that the laundry detergent we use All Free Clear had added Plus+. I went on line to check out the difference in ingredients of the All Free Clear ( that we have used for 17 years) and this new All Free Clear Plus+. I didn't find a list of ingredients but I did find review after review of incidents that have occurred just like ours. People use this product because they have allergies and it is causing severe allergic reactions. Check it out at www.sunproductscorp.com.
I washed my clothes and bedding with Kirkland Signature Environmentally Responsible Liquid Laundry Detergent (https://www.costco.com/Kirkland-Signature-Environmentally-Responsible-Liquid-Laundry-Detergent-194-fl.-oz%2c-126-Loads.product.100379274.html). This started an allergic reaction resulting in anaphylaxis on the second day. I was rushed to the emergency room where I was given high doses of Prednisone and [REDACTED] to stop the reaction. While the Costco website does not allow reviews, you can see where the product is listed on [REDACTED] there are over 30 reviews where people have reported severe allergic reactions to this product.
I have an itchy skin rash after using Tide with Febreze. Left a strong smell on clothes. Had respiratory symptoms while clothes were drying inside.
Caller stated that he used crystals to wash his laundry after he wore his clothing he broke out in hives. He had to visit the Veteran's Administration hospital in MA. He stated that while reporting the incident he is currently waiting in the ER for treatment. He stated that he contacted the company and they advised him that they would send him a rebate of $7. However, he informed them that he is not interested in the money but he is concerned about the safety of the product. Caller feels that this detergent crystal is a health hazard and should be taken off the market.
On the evening of August 14, 2019 I did a small load of laundry. I reached into the Dropps.com container to get out a pod and 4 were stuck together. I pulled them apart into 2 sections and then took one of the pairs and pulled them apart. As I pulled, I must have squeezed and one exploded and the detergent shot into my right eye. The pain was searing and I immediately tried to flush my eye. The detergent was thick and just got soapy as I flushed. I had my husband drive me to Urgent Care where they repeatedly flushed the eye over the course of an hour. Eventually they sent me home recommending that I see an ophthalmologist in the morning or go to the ER if it was not better. In the morning the eye was too painful to open, swollen, inflamed, and I had no vision, I called the doctor recommended by Urgent Care but there were no appointments available. My husband took me to the Emergency Room at [REDACTED] Medical Center (a Shock Trauma center). I was seen by an ENT. Again he flushed my eye using a drain and running a liter of fluid through it. He sent me home with prescriptions for antibiotics and a recommendation to see an ophthalmologist. On August 16, I called the Envision Eye Center ([REDACTED]) to schedule an appointment. I explained what had happened and they had me come in immediately. [REDACTED] diagnosed me with a chemical burn to my eye which burned all the skin over my cornea and the white of my eye. Treatment continues because, as I healed, I developed a herpes simplex rash in my eye due to the stress and compromise. It is now over a month and I am still being treated and still do not have my full vision back. This has been very debilitating. I have lost money losing time at work, was unable to fly to a family reunion and lost my and my husband's air fares, have paid medical and pharmacy bills, and have been terrified and in pain. I DO NOT want to see this happen to anyone else. These pods stick together all the time. Clearly they are fragile. I am not a chi
This is a 13 mo old girl who bit into a Tide pod, and presented to the hospital with vomiting and oral burns. An endoscopy showed a Grade I caustic injury to her esophagus.
Three year old daughter mistook single use pacs of ALL free and clear laundry soap as candy and became violently sick as well as my small dog. I believe that had they been packaged in a container rather that in a [REDACTED] type resealable bag it might have stopped her from eatting it. Also, I think the warning label should include the poison control number, and that the pacs themselves might be changed color wise to help turn people away from eatting them.
Showing 8 of 118 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to laundry soaps or detergents on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Laundry Soaps Or Detergents: cross-group products nearest on danger score (36/100), estimated annual ER visits (17,950/yr), and hospitalization share (1.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Laundry Soaps Or Detergents ranks #370 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #130 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does laundry soaps or detergents rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, laundry soaps or detergents ranks #370 by PlainSafety danger score (36/100) and #130 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (17,950/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from laundry soaps or detergents?
The most common injury is derma/conjunct to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 74,459 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from laundry soaps or detergents increasing or decreasing?
Down 23% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for laundry soaps or detergents injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 120,011 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by laundry soaps or detergents?
Of all ER visits involving laundry soaps or detergents, approximately 1.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (98.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with laundry soaps or detergents?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.