Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Fuel Storage Tanks ranks #256 of 838 by danger score (38/100) at ER-volume #341 of 838 (3,282/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #256
- danger rank of 838
- #341
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 38/100
- danger score
- 3,282/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (38/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
38 Around the middle lower than 30% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 62/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 9 | 72nd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 3,282 | 53rd | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | +1% | 67th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 16 | 53rd | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 65,665 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 980. Segments sum to 65,665 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Workshop Tools & Equipment danger scores
How this 38/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for fuel storage tanks - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 3,282 ER visits/yr Above median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 8.6% Above median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.05% Above-typical fatality rate
- 5-year trend+1%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for fuel storage tanks are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2018 (4,959 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2007 (1,592 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 3,903 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by poisoning to the all parts body (2,912 cases). The 45-54 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 12,687 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 8.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.05%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 16 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how fuel storage tanks fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 1,689 | 273 | |
| 5-14 | 2,499 | 1,014 | |
| 15-24 | 3,283 | 1,780 | |
| 25-34 | 3,736 | 4,111 | |
| 35-44 | 3,934 | 4,873 | |
| 45-54 | 5,567 | 7,120 | |
| 55-64 | 5,071 | 5,505 | |
| 65-74 | 4,968 | 3,601 | |
| 75+ | 4,578 | 2,021 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Ankle | Fracture | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| Elbow | Fracture | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Knee | Other | |
| Knee | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Burn, Chemical | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Upper Trunk | Other |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
52 YOF INJ LT SHOULDER TRIPPED OVER GAS HOSE AT GAS STATION DX FX LT SHOULDER
89YOF TRIPPED AND FELL WHILE PUMPING GAS AT ***, HIT HEAD. HAS BRUISING AND SWELLING TO THE RIGHT SIDE OF FACE. DX: HEAD INJURY
21YOM IN MVA HIT GAS PUMP. ABRASION TO THE DORSUM OF HIS HAND AND CLAVICLE DX: HAND ABRASION, RIGHT CLAVICULAR ABRASION
56YOM BROUGHT IN BY EMS FROM HOME FOR WEAKNESS AND TIGHTNESS IN HIS LEFT KNEE. STATES HE WAS PUMPING GAS WHEN HIS KNEE GAVE OUT ON HIM, HE FELL AND HE COULDN'T GET BACK UP. DX: ACUTE PAIN OF RIGHT KNEE
32 YOM PRESENTS WITH BURN TO THE RIGHT HAND. HE WAS PUMPING GAS, AND TESTING OUT A NEW LIGHTER HE HAD PURCHASED, WHEN GASOLINE IGNITED, AND FLASHED INTO HIS FACE, BURNING HIS RIGHT HAND AND PANTS. RIGHT HAND AND WRIST WITH CIRCUMFERENTIAL BURNS WITH MULTIPLE AREAS OF BLISTERS. ?FD DX BURN
39YOM PT INJURED SHOULDER WHEN OIL HOSE GOT STUCK ON A WATER PIPE & EXTERNALLY ROTATED PT'S SHOULDER DX: LEFT SHOULDER STRAIN
44YOM PATIENT WAS CLEANING A FUEL LINE THAT HAD A LOT OF DEBRIS IN IT AND THE DEBRIS BLEW INTO HIS EYE. HE CONTINUES TO HAVE FOREIGN BODY SENSATION AFTER RINSING HIS EYE. DX: LEFT CORNEAL ABRASION
73YOF PATIENT WAS PUMPING GAS WHEN SHE TRIPPED OVER THE GAS HOSE AND LANDED ON HER RIGHT KNEE. DX: KNEE PAIN, FALL
36YOF WAS FILLING UP HER CAR WITH GAS WHEN TRIPPED OVER THE HOSE AND FELL ONTO HANDS AND KNEES DX: ACUTE PAIN OF RIGHT KNEE; PAIN OF RIGHT FOREARM; RIGHT HAND PAIN
67YOM FELL WHILE PUMPING GAS, ENDORSES LEFT SIDED PAIN TO CHEST WALL, LEFT KNEE PAIN, DX: MECHANICAL FALL, LEFT RIB CONTUSION
45YOM WHILE BURNING YARD DEBRIS AND FUEL CONTAINER BLEW UP IN FRONT OF HIM DX: RT HAND BURNS
25YOM PRESENTS WITH FOOT AND ANKLE PAIN. PATIENT REPORTS THAT HE WAS GETTING GAS AND ATTEMPTED TO STEP OVER THE GAS HOSE AND FELL LANDING ON HIS FOOT. DX: ANKLE SPRAIN
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
This report is about a Garage Boss brand 5 gallon fuel container with "Press N Pour" spout. The button in the spout which controls the flow of gasoline is not properly sealed and, when pouring, gasoline spills out around the button in an uncontrolled manner. This gasoline can go anywhere and is a serious fire hazard. You can research this problem with this product and find that it is not uncommon. I reported via the Garage Boss corporate web site on two occasions and have not received a reply.
Purchased two 2-gallon plastic fuel containers from Walmart on Aug 5 at the Airway Heights, WA store. Containers made by Specter Corp. Both containers leak fuel when trying to pour. A rubber gasket is provided which came placed between the spout and the cap. When tightened in this position the gasket slips out of place coming out between the spout and cap. Tried putting the gasket between the spout and container but will not stay in place. Found that placing the gasket between the cap and spout there is a ridge on the spout with a small notch where a gasket could fit but the gasket provided is 2-3 time thicker than the notch so will not fit. The leak is not a small leak but a fair size stream which creates very quickly a large fire hazard. Product needs to be recalled immediately as a extreme safety hazard.
NY City restaurant owner was injured and sustained property damage to his restaurant as the result of a defective product. The defective product was a Sievert Mapp Gas cannister containing UN 1077 Propylene Gas. The gas cannister was defective because it had a gas leak which resulted in a fireball when the restaurant owner attempted to use it. The restaurant owner was using the Mapp Gas cannister with a corresponding Mapp Gas torch. The torch was being used to repair a pipe in the kitchen. As soon as he turned on the torch the leaked gas burst into a fireball. This scene was captured on the restaurant's security camera. The video has been preserved. The restaurant owner suffered a burn to his finger and damage to the restaurant's property.
I was using my credit card to pay for gas in the morning, I swiped it and started to pump gas and realized that gasoline sprayed all over my car, pants, feet, and shoes from the hose. The attendent ran out and turned off the pump. About an entire gallon of gas sprayed all over me and ruined my clothes and new shoes. I had gasoline all over me for the rest of the day and my foot started to burn during the day.
I put my Harbor Freight transfer fuel pump (63847) in a 5-gallon can of gas to transfer fuel to my car (like I've done many times before) and when I switched it on, gasoline started gushing out through the battery compartment and the on/off switch so I instinctively switched it off. Moments later I realized that could have caused a spark! It should be impossible for the fuel to enter the battery compartment and the on/off switch but it did. This product should be recalled immediately before it injures or kill someone.
I was refueling our garden tractor (riding mower) using a "Flo n go Superflo" gasoline transfer pump on a 5-gallon gasoline can. When I pumped the handle of the Flo n go Superflo, gasoline leaked out of the Superflo handle and all over the gasoline can & tractor creating an extremely hazardous situation. Fortunately, I was able to clean the spilled gasoline without it igniting so there were no injuries. I contacted the manufacturer's Custom Service and was informed that the unit was past the manufacturer's 1-year warranty and no service or repairs were available. Without maintenance, the product either works OK or leaks badly, creating a serious hazard. http://www.flo-n-go.com/products/product_superflo/
I bought 2 transfer pumps from walmart, the pumps were very poorly made! The hose it self is garbage it doesn't fit well onto the pump it can fall off when your pumping fuel it spills and leaks
The threaded opening of this ExtremePowerUS 14 gallon portable fuel tank became disconnected from the tank despite being a molded portion of the tank. This occurred when attempting to remove the gas cap from the opening. The gas cap to tank fitting had been problematic since buying the tank in December of 2021 through Amazon. This contributed to a spill that fortunately did not result in a fire.
Showing 8 of 16 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to fuel storage tanks on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Fuel Storage Tanks: cross-group products nearest on danger score (38/100), estimated annual ER visits (3,282/yr), and hospitalization share (8.6%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Fuel Storage Tanks ranks #256 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #341 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does fuel storage tanks rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, fuel storage tanks ranks #256 by PlainSafety danger score (38/100) and #341 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (3,282/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from fuel storage tanks?
The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 3,903 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from fuel storage tanks increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for fuel storage tanks injuries?
The 45-54 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 12,687 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by fuel storage tanks?
Of all ER visits involving fuel storage tanks, approximately 8.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (91.4%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with fuel storage tanks?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.