Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Fuel-burning Lighting Equipment ranks #313 of 838 by danger score (37/100) at ER-volume #559 of 838 (747/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #313
- danger rank of 838
- #559
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 37/100
- danger score
- 747/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (37/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
37 Around the middle lower than 37% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 60/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 17 | 91st | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 747 | 29th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -13% | 46th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 33 | 64th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 14,948 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 4060. Segments sum to 14,948 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Floors, Walls & Ceilings group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Floors, Walls & Ceilings danger scores
How this 37/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for fuel-burning lighting equipment - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 747 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 17.2% Very high admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-13%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for fuel-burning lighting equipment are declining by about 13% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2005 (1,200 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2015 (249 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is burns, thermal to the hand, accounting for approximately 2,752 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by poisoning to the all parts body (1,964 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 2,927 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 17.2% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 33 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how fuel-burning lighting equipment fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 1,676 | 1,251 | |
| 5-14 | 1,381 | 178 | |
| 15-24 | 1,665 | 1,115 | |
| 25-34 | 1,388 | 736 | |
| 35-44 | 1,483 | 760 | |
| 45-54 | 699 | 719 | |
| 55-64 | 391 | 536 | |
| 65-74 | 234 | 241 | |
| 75+ | 271 | 214 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Hand | Burns, Thermal | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Face | Burns, Thermal | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Finger | Burns, Thermal | |
| Lower Leg | Burns, Thermal | |
| Lower Arm | Burns, Thermal | |
| Upper Trunk | Burns, Thermal | |
| Upper Leg | Burns, Thermal | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| All Parts Body | Anoxia | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| All Parts Body | Other | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
12 YOM HELPING MOTHER REMOVE WICK FROM LANTERN, GLASS BROKE CUTTING FINGER DX FINGER LACERATION
33YOF PATIENT STATES SHE WAS TRY TO LIGHT A CIGARETTE WITH A TORCH AND IT CAUGHT HER SHIRT ON FIRE, SUSTAINED BURNS TO THE CHEST AND FACE, FIRE DEPARTMENT ATTENDANCE IS NOT RECORD DX: BURN, MULTIPLE OF FACE, HEAD AND NECK, DEEP 3RD DEGREE WITH PART LOSS
2YOM, KNOCKED A HURRICANE LAMP OFF TABLE BROKE CUT HIS HEAD DX SCALP LACERATION
6YOM PT PLAYING WITH FRIEND- THEY WERE PLAYING WITH A FIRE & A BUTANE LIGHTER WAS THROWN INTO FIRE & EXPLODED CAUSING FLASH BURN - UNKNOWN IF FIRE DEPARTMENT WAS @ THE SCENE DX: FACIAL BURN
47YOF STATES THAT SHE WALKED OUT OF HER HOUSE AND SHE THOUGHT SHE HEARD SOMEBODY CALLING HER NAME AND THE NEXT THING SHE REMEMBERS WAS BEING ON FIRE THE MAN SHE LIVES WITH THINKS IT WAS A *** TORCH THAT BURNED HER NOTHING STATED ABOUT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT DX: SECOND DEGREE FACIAL BURN; PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN OF CHEST WALL
20YOM PRESENTS WITH BURN TO HAND. PATIENT STATES HE WAS USING A PROPANE TORCH TO LIGHT A FIRE EARLIER THIS MORNING AND ACCIDENTALLY BURNED HIS HAND. NO FIRE DEPARTMENT AT SCENE. DX: PARTIAL-THICKNESS BURN TO HAND
40YOM PRESENTS WITH BILATERAL HAND BURNS AND L THIGH BURN. WAS BBQ THIS AM WHEN A *** LAMP POPPED, AND THE GEL LANDED ON HIS HANDS AND L THIGH. DX: FIRST DEGREE BURNS OF MULTIPLE SITES, PARTIAL THICKNESS BURNS OF MULTIPLE SITES
27YOM, CUT LEFT THUMB ON GLASS T*** 40 MINUTES PRIOR TO ARRIVAL, DX: LACERATION OF LEFT THUMB
18YOM CUT FINGER ON AN OIL LAMP. DX: FINGER LAC
45YOM PRESENTS AFTER PT WAS ATTEMPTING TO LIGHT A FIRE AND GOT BURNED BY BUTANE FLAME TO INNER THIGHS. DID NOT SEEK MEDICAL ATTENTION UNTIL TODAY. UNKNOWN IF FIRE DEPARTMENT PRESENT. DX: THERMAL BURN
63YOF c/o left lower leg burn 3 weeks ago, knocked over *** and the citronella oil got on her pants, burst into flames, sustained 1st and second degree burn, and unable to get in to see her doctor at the time and now wants tomake sure its okay. No fire dept attendeed. Dx: 1st and 2nd degree burns left lower leg
3YOF presents after a ***fell over and hit her on the top of the head causing a superficial abrasion to her scalp DX: abrasion of scalp
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
While camping with the family, we were using a Coleman 2 Piece Propane Tree (Model No.2000005192) to connect my propane lantern to a standard 20lb propane tank. While using the lantern, the plastic "hand wheel" (as they call it on their website) that attaches the propane tree to the propane tank split in two and caused the propane tree to pivot where it connects to the tank, causing the lantern to come crashing down and break on the ground. Had I not been incredibly careful to keep it away from anything combustible, it could have easily started a fire. This was only the 3rd time I have used the propane tree and the plastic nut (or "hand wheel") was only hand tightened onto the propane tank per the instructions. I would guess that material expansion and contraction caused by the change in temperature caused the plastic to break. It was almost 90 degrees out and running the lantern caused the propane tank to get cold. I would consider this to be a very big safety flaw. That nut should clearly be made out of a material that can withstand these types of temperature fluctuations since it is not uncommon for people to use it during the summer and propane tanks will always get cold when being used.
3 of 4 Tiki torches we purchased caught on fire, one of which set the mulch and surrounding shrubs on fire. No damage to the brick house. We think the basket burned and then the fuel cannister fell out, spilling on the mulch. It happened very fast.
Lantern was in use when the caller noticed a flame coming out of the wrong valve. Caller turned the lantern off immediately. Caller believes this product is a fire hazard.
Incident occured on 8/13/2011 We were at our cabin with friends, sitting around a table. A Stansport Two Mantel Lantern was hanging on a hook in the cabin. The lantern was not light. The regulator on the lantern apparently ruptured and propane gas was spewing from the lantern. I was able to disconnect the lantern from the propane source. No one was hurt in the incident, however, had the lantern been lit, it would have easily resulted in a fire, explosion, serious injury, loss of life or property. I believe this is a serious flaw in the lantern. I have included a video which shows how the lantern leaks when attached to propane source.
Torch flames very high, even when wick is cit way down torch bottle leaked out all of the lamp oil, making a dangerous mess. we bought 3 stands with a total of 12 torches.
Coleman lantern model 2000 (gasoline fuel) can have the burner tube separate from its holder (burner assembly) while in operation causing serious damage to life and property.
The consumer says the product floats into the air like a heated baloon. It floats until lit and than falls to the ground. The consumer says that this poses as aserious fire hazard. She says that the labels state to not use near airports, not to use near dry crops, always keep water near by and wear flame retardant clothing, never smoke while handling the lanterns and she says those are just a few.
I took my Coleman lantern case out of the garage and put it down on the patio. When I grabbed it again, the lantern dropped out of the bottom of the case. I noticed the instruction "TO LATCH, PUSH", so I followed the instruction and latched the bottom. When I picked it up again, the lantern fell out of the bottom, this time shattering and leaving little shards of glass everywhere. I am filing this report because I believe this is a dangerous design. The latch is "loose" by default, with no visual indication, and the instruction is molded into the plastic with no color contrast, instead of a bright warning label as it should have. Even after following the instructions the latch can still fail.
Showing 8 of 33 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to fuel-burning lighting equipment on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Floors, Walls & Ceilings
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Fuel-burning Lighting Equipment: cross-group products nearest on danger score (37/100), estimated annual ER visits (747/yr), and hospitalization share (17.2%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Floors, Walls & Ceilings
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Fuel-burning Lighting Equipment ranks #313 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #559 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does fuel-burning lighting equipment rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, fuel-burning lighting equipment ranks #313 by PlainSafety danger score (37/100) and #559 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (747/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from fuel-burning lighting equipment?
The most common injury is burns, thermal to the hand, accounting for approximately 2,752 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from fuel-burning lighting equipment increasing or decreasing?
Down 13% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for fuel-burning lighting equipment injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 2,927 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by fuel-burning lighting equipment?
Of all ER visits involving fuel-burning lighting equipment, approximately 17.2% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (82.8%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with fuel-burning lighting equipment?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.