CPSC NEISS · code 567

Coaxial Cable

Coaxial Cable: danger rank #574 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #662 of 838 (356 estimated ER visits a year; rising by about 36% over the last five years).

Home Structures & Construction Materials CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2007-2024, Coaxial Cable ranks #574 of 838 by danger score (32/100) at ER-volume #662 of 838 (356/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#574
danger rank of 838
#662
ER-volume rank of 838
32/100
danger score
356/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (32/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

32 Lower than most lower than 68% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 30/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

B
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 3 21st 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 356 21st 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +36% 89th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 1 18th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 6,421 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 567. Segments sum to 6,421 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Structures & Construction Materials group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Home Structures & Construction Materials danger scores

1. Telephones Or Telephone A…45/1002. Computers (equipment And …42/1003. Televisions40/1004. Other Sound Recording, Re…39/1005. Record Players (self-cont…38/1006. Stereo Or Hi-fi Component…38/1007. Television Tables Or Stan…38/1008. Coaxial Cable32/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10032/100
PlainSafety danger score · Coaxial Cable

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 32/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for coaxial cable - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 356 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.6% Low admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend+36%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 18-year NEISS window from 2007 to 2024, injury counts for coaxial cable are rising by about 36% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2008 (1,040 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2015 (111 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 749 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the hand (490 cases). The 35-44 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 1,268 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 1 consumer incident report filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how coaxial cable fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2007–2024)

05001K2K 2007201020132016201920222024 244
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Coaxial Cable, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 219 33 252
5-14 252 221 473
15-24 419 173 592
25-34 975 169 1,144
35-44 1,144 124 1,268
45-54 592 145 737
55-64 306 444 750
65-74 376 192 568
75+ 402 230 632

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 749
Hand Laceration 490
Eyeball Contusions, Abr. 485
Knee Contusions, Abr. 333
Lower Trunk Strain, Sprain 317
Head Internal Injury 313
Mouth Laceration 197
Lower Trunk Other 173
Eyeball Other 153
Shoulder Fracture 151
All Parts Body Electric Shock 148
Face Laceration 128
Lower Arm Other 127
Knee Strain, Sprain 115
Face Contusions, Abr. 103

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 93.6% (6,011)
Left Without Being Seen 4.1% (266)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 2.0% (128)
Treated And Transferred 0.2% (16)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 39 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

39YOM COMPLAINS OF LACERATIONS TO BOTH HANDS. HE WAS HOLDING CABLE WIRE WHEN IT SLIPPED THROUGH HIS HANDS AND CAUSED THE LACERATIONS. DX: LACERATION OF FINGER, LACERATION TO MULTIPLE SITES OF HANDS AND FINGERS

Age 46 · Male · Neck · Other · 2024

46 YOM WITH LOWER BACK PAIN AND NECK PAIN AFTER BEING HIT BY A CABLE 3-4 DAYS PTA. DX BILATERAL SCIATICA, NECK PAIN, DDD LUMBAR

Age 20 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

20 YOF C/O HEAD AND SHOULDER PAIN AFTER STEEL CABLE WHEEL HIT HER TODAY WHILE HELPING HER STEP-FATHER, DX; HEAD INJURY, SHOULDER PAIN

Age 74 · Female · Upper Arm · Fracture · 2024

74YOF PRESENTS FROM HOME AFTER FALL. PATIENT'S HUSBAND STATES SHE TRIPPED OVER CABLE CORD GOING ACROSS THE ROOM. DX: HUMERUS FRACTURE, PERIORBITAL CONTUSION, THORACIC BACK PAIN

Age 7 · Male · Lower Arm · Fracture · 2024

7YOM TRIPPED OVER COAX CABLE AT SCHOOL AND FELL TO FLOOR DX: FRACTURE LEFT RADIUS AND ULNA

Age 43 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2023

43YOM CUT HIS LEFT INDEX FINGER WHILE CUTTING CABLE. +LAC REPAIR. DX FINGER LACERATION

Age 60 · Male · Knee · Contusions, Abr. · 2023

60YOM TRIPPED OVER A CABLE WIRE OUTSIDE AND FELL ONTO CONCRETE RESULTING IN PAIN TO HIS LEFT KNEE AND LEFT ELBOW DX: FALL, ABRASION OF LEFT KNEE AND ABRASION OF LEFT ELBOW

Age 34 · Female · Lower Arm · Contusions, Abr. · 2023

34YOF ABRASION TO THIGH AND ARM WHEN HELPING CABLE WORKER WITH WIRE ACROSS STREET AND CAR HIT WAIRE. WIRE WHIPPED UP HITTING PTDX ABRASION L ARM, ABRASION R AND L THIGH, CONTUSION FOREARM

Age 30 · Male · Hand · Burn, Electrical · 2023

30YOM REPORTS PULLING CABLE FROM CEILING WITH HAND AND WAS SHOCKED, PT STATES CABLE SPARKED IN MY HAND LIKE AN EXPLOSION, DX ELECTRICAL BURN(CHARRED) OF SKIN OF HAND

Age 28 · Male · Lower Trunk · Foreign Body · 2022

28 YOM INJURED FROM FOREIGN BODY, PUSHED CABLE INTO PENIS AND BLADDER,AT HOME. DX-FOREIGN BODY IN BLADDER AND URETHRA

Age 29 · Female · Knee · Contusions, Abr. · 2022

29 YOF INJURED KNEE, TRIPPED OVER CABLES, LANDED FACE DOWN AT HOME. DX-FALL,A BRASION LEFT KNEE, LEFT BEFORE BEING SEEN

Age 77 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2022

77 YOM-WALKING OUTSIDE WITH FRIENDS-TRIPPED OVER A CABLE-FELL FORWARD DX: FOREHEAD LACERATION & KNEE/ELBOW ABRASIONS

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

7/8/2019 · Incident, No Injury · Jasco Products Company LLC · Oregon

The consumer indicates that he was watching a movie when all of a sudden he saw a flames behind his television. The consumer immediately turned off the power switch and the breaker box. When the consumer looked around, he noticed that the entire six-foot y audio cable was burnt, which he proceeded to disconnect from the television and computer. The consumer notes that the y audio cable ruined the rear audio jack. The consumer sent the Manufacturer a physical letter explaining the situation however he has yet to hear from them. The consumer states that the unit was used daily since it was purchased. The consumer plans on keeping his audio cable for at least the next thirty days in case an investigation ensues.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to coaxial cable on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Home Structures & Construction Materials

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Coaxial Cable: cross-group products nearest on danger score (32/100), estimated annual ER visits (356/yr), and hospitalization share (2.6%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Coaxial Cable ranks #574 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #662 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does coaxial cable rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, coaxial cable ranks #574 by PlainSafety danger score (32/100) and #662 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (356/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from coaxial cable?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 749 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from coaxial cable increasing or decreasing?

Up 36% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for coaxial cable injuries?

The 35-44 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 1,268 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by coaxial cable?

Of all ER visits involving coaxial cable, approximately 2.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.3%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with coaxial cable?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Coaxial Cable is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.