Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Weight Lifting (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) ranks #105 of 838 by danger score (42/100) at ER-volume #32 of 838 (95,607/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #105
- danger rank of 838
- #32
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 42/100
- danger score
- 95,607/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (42/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
42 Higher than most more dangerous than 84% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 61/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 3 | 22nd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 95,607 | 100th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -9% | 52nd | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 80 | 79th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 1.9M estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 3265. Segments sum to 1.9M - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Sports Protective Equipment & Gear group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Sports Protective Equipment & Gear danger scores
How this 42/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment) - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 95,607 ER visits/yr Very high volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.7% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.01% Low fatality rate
- 5-year trend-9%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment) are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (125,296 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (65,716 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is strain, sprain to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 202,441 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by other to the upper trunk (148,628 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 651,055 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.7% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.01%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 80 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 34,983 | 21,038 | |
| 5-14 | 112,130 | 44,814 | |
| 15-24 | 531,645 | 119,269 | |
| 25-34 | 332,804 | 86,097 | |
| 35-44 | 211,337 | 67,165 | |
| 45-54 | 134,123 | 47,225 | |
| 55-64 | 66,502 | 27,272 | |
| 65-74 | 35,281 | 13,981 | |
| 75+ | 17,497 | 8,779 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Shoulder | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Upper Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Shoulder | Other | |
| Foot | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Toe | Fracture | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Neck | Strain, Sprain | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Upper Arm | Strain, Sprain | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Wrist | Strain, Sprain | |
| Face | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
60 YOF REPORTS SHE WAS USING A ***, WHEN GETTING UP SHE TRIPPED ON IT AND LANDED ON HER RIGHT ARM/SHOULDER. DX: UPPER ARM FX
15YOM PRESENTS TO ED FOR ABDOMINAL PAIN. PT STATES ABDOMINAL PAIN STARTED TODAY AT SCHOOL AT WEIGHT-TRAINING. REFERRED FROM SCHOOL NURSE. DX: NOT STATED ( LWBS-LEFT W/O BEING SEEN AFTER TRIAGE)
21 YOM ABD PAIN LIFTING WEIGHTS DX; ABD STRAIN
34YOM PATIENT WAS LIFTING WEIGHTS AND FELT A POP NEAR HIS LEFT SHOULDER DX: PAIN OF LEFT CLAVICLE
59YOM TO ED WITH LOW BACK PAIN, 2 WKS AGO PT WAS DOIND MANUAL LABOR AND FELT BACK PAIN, THIS WAS FOLLOWED ABOUT 1.5 WKS AGO BY MVA, PT WAS REST DRIVER, HIT STATIONARY OBJECT, NO AIRBAGS, YESTERDAY, PT WAS TRYING TO LIFT WEIGHTS DEV BACK PAIN, DX MIDLINE THORACIC BACK PAIN
22 YOM WAS WEIGHT LIFTING ABOUT 500 POUNDS YESTERDAY. HE ATTEMPTED TO BAIL OUT DURING A SQUAT AND THE WEIGHT ROLLED OVER HIS NECK. +NECK PAIN WITH NUMBNESS/TINGLING IN HIS FEET. DX NECK STRAIN, PARESTHESIA
16YOM PT IN TH16E GYM @ SCHOOL WHEN A FRIEND PULLED A WEIGHT BAR DOWN ON PT'S HEAD DX: CONCUSSION
36YOM TO ER FOR PAIN RIGHT SHOULDER THAT STARTED 1 DAY AFTER LIFTING WEIGHTS DX ACUTE PAIN RIGHT SHOULDER
68YOM WITH SHOULDER PAIN AFTER DOING HEAVY LIFTING AT THE GYM DX: SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT
17YOF WAS AT THE GYM & HAD A WEIGHT ROLL ONTO HER FOOT, PT WAS WEARING SOCKS AT THE TIME, NO SHOES, PT HAS INJURY TO LEFT FOOT DX INJURY LEFT FOOT
19YOF, SUSTAINED BACK INJURY WITH DISCARNATION WHILE LIFTING WEIGHTS SINCE THEN WITH ON AND OFF LOW BACK PAIN, DX: ACUTE BILATERAL LOW BACK PAIN WITH BILATERAL SCIATICA
29YOM, USUALLY WORKS OUT WITH HEAVY WEIGHTS AND TODAY WHILE HE WAS LIFTING HIS DAUGHTER DEVELOPED CHEST PAIN, DX: CHEST PAIN UNSPECIFIED
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Purchased CAP Barbell Olympic-size advanced weight bench in January 2015. There is a bar which supports the adjustable bench and the weight of the user and the weights they are lifting. The manual states the maximum weight tolerance is 500 lbs (weight of user + weights being lifted). Just noticed on 8/27/15 that this bar is now bent after normal use (never exceeded 430 lbs in combined weight). This is a very dangerous situation because if this bar was to bend further or collapse during weight lifting (bench pressing) it could cause the weight to come crashing down on the user resulting in serious injury or death.
The plate came disconnected from the dumbell.
We have owned these adjustable Nordic Track dumbbells for about a year. In the past few months, when I lift one of the weights, the lock that is supposed to hold the plates in place comes undone and the plates will become dislodged and fall to the floor. It fell on a treadmill we own and cut the tread. It also has nearly fallen on our feet - in some cases it could fall on someone's head, depending on the movement they were doing.
Adjustable dumbell set (25lb tot wt) model #WSAW2505-K came apart during use. Icon Health and Fitness would/does not provide the wrench to periodically tighten. I received the adjustable dumbbells model number WSAW2505-K as a gift 2 years ago. I began using them regularly about June 2011. On 9/11/11 while doing curls, one dumbbell separated, dropping half of the weights (3 rings) and a screw came off. Luckily it did not fall on me or break anything. I slid the piece back together and replaced the washer and screw, but did not have the tool to completely tighten it. I contacted the Icon service department first through a chat session with [redacted] on 9/12/11. He did not have much information, but said he thought it was an allen wrench of unknown size. He gave me a telephone number to call:[redacted]. When I called and repeated my story, asking for the tool to tighten the screw, I was told that they did not sell any parts and that I should be able to get a allen wrench set that would probably have one that fit. I asked if others had this problem and the person said it happens "rarely" and that they recommend that you check all screws periodically. I believe they should provide the proper wrench with this equipment and more prominently state that it needs tightening on a regular basis.
The weights fell apart
I used these plates only about 6-10 times over the period of about 6 months. There were times the slide mechanism in one of them would 'jam' and sometimes be hard to disengage. I didn't think anything of it, though. I never dropped the weights, always used the plastic holder that came with them, and never caused impact to the plates in anyway. After this incident, I read the manual to ensure I didn't use them incorrectly. I do use these plates at max weight on most workouts, usually for squats, so I may be an outlier. Tonight though, I missed closing hours for the gym and decided to use these weights to do a set a normally do with regular dumbbells. One of these exercises are aptly named "skullcrushers" at a full 50lb weight setting - I do a variant though where I put the dumbbell behind just my head, in case it slips or something happens. Thankfully, I did that, because the bolt holding the plates sheared off mid exercise, the sliding mechanism popped out, and 2 or 3 of the plates on that side of the dumbbell whacked me right on the very top of head leaving a nice knot. I was lucky I didnt have the dumbbell above my face at the full extension, as normal skullcrushers call for. The bolt holding the sliding mechanism is only about 10mm in diameter, and appears to have sustained shear failure. The length of the moment arm of the sliding mechanism at full extension is about 140mm. I do not believe a single bolt is sufficient for such load. I'd be glad to ship the dumbbells back for analysis by their engineering team or CPSC for further analysis
I am an experiences trainer and was working out in my home gym. While doing a leg press exercise on the Nautilus NT-CC1 Smith Machine, as I have done many times in the past, the bench unexpectedly collapsed into the decline position and the bar bell, with 150 lbs, fell onto my head. I spent 30 days in ICU and almost died. I had a fractured skull and a traumatic brain injury.
I picked up the weights and I started lifting 60 lbs on each arm and my little bro was video taping me as I curl these weights. About half way through my set a weight on my right hand dumbbell drops on the floor and bounces on to my little brothers foot.
Showing 8 of 80 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment) on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Sports Protective Equipment & Gear
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Weight Lifting (activity, Apparel Or Equipment): cross-group products nearest on danger score (42/100), estimated annual ER visits (95,607/yr), and hospitalization share (2.7%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
- Thermal Or Sound Insulation Materials Building Materials & Home Structures 2.7%admitted
- Radios (self-contained Units) Home Structures & Construction Materials 2.7%admitted
- Coaxial Cable Home Structures & Construction Materials 2.6%admitted
- Aluminum Foil Wrapping Products Containers & Packaging 2.7%admitted
Related Products in Sports Protective Equipment & Gear
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Weight Lifting (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) ranks #105 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #32 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment) rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment) ranks #105 by PlainSafety danger score (42/100) and #32 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (95,607/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment)?
The most common injury is strain, sprain to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 202,441 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment) increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment) injuries?
The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 651,055 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment)?
Of all ER visits involving weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment), approximately 2.7% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.3%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with weight lifting (activity, apparel or equipment)?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.