37
CPSC NEISS Data 2005–2024

Clothes Dryers, Not Specified

Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.

Laundry & Household Appliances · CPSC Code 127

Stable over 5 years

The verdict

Clothes Dryers, Not Specified carry a danger score of 37/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 7,762 ER-treated injuries a year that are roughly flat over the last five years.

37/100
danger score (low risk)
7,762
ER visits per year (avg)
5.5%
end in hospital admission
25-34
most-injured age group

Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 127 - last data year 2024.

PlainSafety danger score

0/100100/10037/100
PlainSafety danger score

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 37/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for clothes dryers, not specified - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume7,762 ER visits/yr
  • Severity (hospitalization rate)5.5%
  • Fatality rate0.00%
  • 5-year trend-8%

See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Clothes Dryers, Not Specified (CPSC product code 127, in the Laundry & Household Appliances category) generate an estimated 7,762 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 155,236 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 37/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2012 (9,162 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (6,252 estimated visits).

The single most common ER diagnosis for clothes dryers, not specified is strain, sprain to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 16,691 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the finger (11,810 cases). The 25-34 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 30,257 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 5.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 155 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how clothes dryers, not specified fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

7,762
Injuries / Year
5.5%
Hospitalization Rate
0.00%
Fatality Rate

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

6K7K8K9K10K 20052008201120142017202020232024 8K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Clothes Dryers, Not Specified, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 3,568 2,754 6,322
5-14 3,455 2,759 6,214
15-24 7,577 7,448 15,025
25-34 15,492 14,643 30,257
35-44 14,321 14,842 29,163
45-54 12,035 12,694 24,729
55-64 7,651 8,925 16,576
65-74 4,033 6,805 10,838
75+ 4,174 11,945 16,119

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Lower Trunk Strain, Sprain 16,691
Finger Laceration 11,810
Lower Trunk Other 10,513
Head Internal Injury 9,843
Hand Laceration 4,322
Upper Trunk Other 4,307
All Parts Body Anoxia 4,041
Shoulder Strain, Sprain 3,602
Upper Trunk Strain, Sprain 3,186
Face Laceration 2,987
Hand Contusions, Abr. 2,851
Foot Contusions, Abr. 2,540
Upper Trunk Contusions, Abr. 2,340
Head Concussion 2,260
Head Contusions, Abr. 2,229

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 93.3% (144,871)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 4.9% (7,548)
Left Without Being Seen 0.8% (1,260)
Treated And Transferred 0.5% (758)
Held For Observation 0.5% (735)
Unknown, Not Stated 0.0% (71)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 57 · Female · Lower Trunk · Nerve Damage · 2024

57 YOF WAS PUTTING A TOWEL IN THE DRYER INJURED LOW BACK DX: SCIATICA

Age 50 · Female · Upper Trunk · Other · 2024

50YOF WAS LOADING THE DRYER WHEN SHE FELT PAIN IN HER CHEST. DX: UPPER TRUNK PAIN.

Age 70 · Female · Lower Trunk · Fracture · 2024

70YOF FOR EVAL OF RIGHT HIP PAIN. SHE HAS CHRONIC GAIT INSTABILITY. SHE LOST HER FOOTING TODAY, FELL BACKWARDS & LANDED ON DRYER. DID NOT STRIKE HEAD OF LOC. DX: INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE OF RIGHT HIP

Age 80 · Male · Upper Arm · Fracture · 2024

80YOM AT HOME INSTALLING A DRYER LOST FOOTING AND FELL LANDED ON L SHOULDER DX HUMERUS FRACTURE

Age 78 · Female · Upper Arm · Fracture · 2024

78 YOF GROUND LEVEL FALL, HIT DRYER THEN FLOOR C/O KNEE AND SHOULDER PAIN DX CLOSED FX HUMERUS, KNEE PAIN

Age 46 · Male · Foot · Other · 2024

46 YOM MOVING DRYER DROPPED DRYER ON FOOT OUT OF BACK OF TRUCK DX FOOT PAIN

Age 34 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

34YOM PATIENT WAS WORKING ON HIS DRYER WHEN HE CUT HIS FINGER ON A PIECE OF METAL OF THE DRYER DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT INDEX FINGER WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY WITHOUT DAMAGE TO NAIL

Age 11 · Female · Lower Arm · Other · 2024

11 YOF C/O LOWER ARM INJURY S/P WAS PLAYING WITH SIBLING AT A LAUNDROMAT AND FELL AGAINST A DRYER. DX: LOWER ARM INJURY

Age 80 · Female · Head · Concussion · 2024

80YOF PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER THE PATIENT HIT HER HEAD ON THE DRYER DOOR COMPLAINING OF HEAD PAIN AND FEELING OFF. DX: HEAD PAIN, CONCUSSION

Age 32 · Female · Head · Concussion · 2024

32YOF,HIT HEAD ON DOOR OF DRYER DIZZINESS,DX:CONCUSSION

Age 44 · Male · All Parts Body · Anoxia · 2024

44 YOM STATES HIS DRYER CAUGHT FIRE IN HIS BASEMENT AND HE WAS EXPOSED TO THICK BLACK SMOKE FOR 5 MINUTES WHILE RUNNING IN AND OUT TRYING TO PUT THE FIRE OUT, COHGB NOT DONE, OXYGEN SATURATIONS 95%, UNKNOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT. DX: SMOKE INHALATION

Age 56 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

56 YOM CUT LEFT INDEX FINGER ON A PIECE OF METAL WHILE MOVING A DRYER, DX: FINGER LACERATION

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/3/2012 · Incident, No Injury · ELECTROLUX/WHITE CONSOLIDATED · Washington

My Frigidaire Clothes Dryer had a fire in the control panel. Fortunately, the fire self extinguished with no damage to my laundry room. I had smelled an odd smell and went down to the basement laundry room to investigate. The dryer is ruined. Frigidaire Model #LEQ215ESO (Item purchased Winter of 2008 from Lowe's, Seattle, WA)

9/24/2013 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. (SEA) · Unspecified

Samsung front load dryer is less than 5 years old and the manufacturer welded seam in the drum has separated causing a users hand or arm to be cut on the sharp metal when loading or unloading items from the dryer. I have contacted Samsung and they are hiding behind the warranty and not standing behind the manufactures defect.

9/23/2016 · Incident, No Injury · WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION · Massachusetts

About 2-3 months ago the consumer's wife noticed that the dryer was taking hours to dry clothes. In August 2016 the dryer stopped working and the consumer contacted a third party technician to repair the dryer. The consumer states that some electronic parts were replaced. The consumer states that the dryer began working but shortly after the consumer's wife noticed that the dryer was still taking 2 hours to dry their kids work out clothes. The consumer contacted the third party technician again and he inspected the dryer about 2 weeks ago. The technician advised the consumer that the dryer had a lot of lint build up near the compressor and engine. The consumer was advised that this presents a fire hazard. The technician contacted Whirlpool to inquire about repair methods and the technician was told that this was a design and could not be repaired. The consumer contacted Whirlpool to inquire about this safety hazard and the consumer states the Rep. (name unknown) advised him that the dryer was out warranty. The consumer was also informed that page 11 in the manual states that the dryer should be cleaned every 2 years. However, the consumer believes the design poses a fire hazard and the dryer has been having this problem shortly after purchase. The consumer states that the technician cleaned the dryer but he is worried about using the dryer. Sometime in August 2015 a technician inspected the dryer because the dryer was taking very long to dry clothes. The consumer was advised that the settings were changed to dry at a higher temperature.

9/2/2025 · Incident, No Injury · SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. (SEA) · Tennessee

Samsung dryer, model # DVE52A5500W/A3 caught fire inside a residence. The homeowner purchased the dryer and had it installed by Lowe's in March 2025. The fire was contained to the insode of the dryer and appears to have ignited in the area of the thermal cut-off on the heating element. There was no interior damage to the structure and no injuries. The dryer was in use at the time of the incident. No previous issues were reported by the homeowner.

9/14/2015 · Incident, No Injury · Sears Holdings Management Corporation · New Hampshire

On Saturday 12 September 2015 after comments from my wife[REDACTED] concerning the continued overheating of our clothes (too hot to touch at the end of the cycle) in our Sears HE 5T (with steam option) dryer I decided to clean the vent. This is something I do twice a year usually around the Time change in October when I also replace the batteries in my smoke alarms. After a thorough cleaning of the vent and the back of the dryer I noticed what I would describe as a burnt rubber smell I thought it might be the drive belt so I took the top of the dryer off and was shocked with what I observed!!! The electronic module/controller/wire harness was melted and had also melted the plastic protective controller directly on top of the module (pictures are available). Despite this defect/flaw the dryer should no Error code (Trouble code as we call it in the automotive world) and the dryer continued to operate and operate at excessive temperatures! This in my mind put my family at risk for a fire and or shock hazard. There is no way in my mind that this dryer should have continued to operate without a warning or thrown a circuit to stop this dryer. I took the pictures to my local Fire Department H/Q in Londonderry, NH and there the battalion chief was equally shocked (no pun intended) about this device being melted and suggested that I report to the manufacture and Consumer Product Safety Commission.

9/13/2020 · Incident, No Injury · LG Electronics, USA · Illinois

This was a new product [clothes dryer]; awesome look; but the item; was subpar; and it caught fire; Not only do we, reasonably, need a refund to my mother who is the mom of this [REDACTED] manager; who was the purchaser; owner; I saw there; While living next-door to the laundry; Although, maybe on a few occasions; the lint and other parts assorted in fire; and I knew it was resorted to Sears or whatever; the issue; I guess the issued reason it didn't uphold; not to the Washer; and I think I heard that Washer bang so loud it sounded like an Industrial Airplane fan; And I'm telling; this is horrid;

9/13/2012 · Incident, No Injury · LG Electronics, USA · Michigan

Caller purchased her dryer in September 2006, she didn't notice any problems with it until around 2009 when it began being much hotter than necessary. She is reporting that her dryer that is not recalled is running at temperatures high enough to have at times burned her clothing and has blackened the vent in the back of the dryer. No matter what setting she uses (which lately is the smart selection) however if she sets it to only five minutes the clothes are too hot to enable touching them. She would like this dryer inspected and recalled and would request a complete repair at manufacturer expense.

9/10/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Sears Holdings Management Corporation · Texas

My dryer seems to be heating too hot. Clothes smell burnt even when drying on permanent press. Kenmore model 96429100. It may be a potential fire hazard.

Showing 8 of 155 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to clothes dryers, not specified on the CPSC website.

Frequently Asked Questions

How dangerous are clothes dryers, not specified?

Based on 20 years of CPSC data, clothes dryers, not specified have a danger score of 37/100 (low risk). An estimated 7,762 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.

What are the most common injuries from clothes dryers, not specified?

The most common injury is strain, sprain to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 16,691 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from clothes dryers, not specified increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for clothes dryers, not specified injuries?

The 25-34 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 30,257 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by clothes dryers, not specified?

Of all ER visits involving clothes dryers, not specified, approximately 5.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (94.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with clothes dryers, not specified?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Safety Guides

What this means for you

Treat the 37/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.

  • See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
  • Injuries cluster in the 25-34 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
  • Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls

NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.

Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.