CPSC NEISS · code 127

Clothes Dryers, Not Specified

Clothes Dryers, Not Specified: danger rank #313 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #243 of 838 (7,762 estimated ER visits a year; roughly flat over the last five years).

Laundry & Household Appliances CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Clothes Dryers, Not Specified ranks #313 of 838 by danger score (37/100) at ER-volume #243 of 838 (7,762/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#313
danger rank of 838
#243
ER-volume rank of 838
37/100
danger score
7,762/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (37/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

37 Around the middle lower than 37% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 63/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

D
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 6 48th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 7,762 67th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -8% 53rd 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 155 90th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 155,243 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 127. Segments sum to 155,243 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Laundry & Household Appliances group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Laundry & Household Appliances danger scores

1. Propane, Lp Or Butane Gas…49/1002. Vacuum Cleaners40/1003. Electric Blankets Or Shee…38/1004. Clothes Dryers, Not Speci…37/1005. Washing Machines, Other O…37/1006. Electric Heating Pads37/1007. Automatic Garage Doors Or…35/1008. Water Heaters, Not Specif…35/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10037/100
PlainSafety danger score · Clothes Dryers, Not Specified

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 37/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for clothes dryers, not specified - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 7,762 ER visits/yr Above median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 5.5% Above median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-8%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for clothes dryers, not specified are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2012 (9,162 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (6,252 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is strain, sprain to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 16,691 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the finger (11,810 cases). The 25-34 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 30,257 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 5.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 155 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how clothes dryers, not specified fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

6K7K8K9K10K 20052008201120142017202020232024 8K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Clothes Dryers, Not Specified, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 3,568 2,754 6,322
5-14 3,455 2,759 6,214
15-24 7,577 7,448 15,025
25-34 15,492 14,643 30,257
35-44 14,321 14,842 29,163
45-54 12,035 12,694 24,729
55-64 7,651 8,925 16,576
65-74 4,033 6,805 10,838
75+ 4,174 11,945 16,119

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Lower Trunk Strain, Sprain 16,691
Finger Laceration 11,810
Lower Trunk Other 10,513
Head Internal Injury 9,843
Hand Laceration 4,322
Upper Trunk Other 4,307
All Parts Body Anoxia 4,041
Shoulder Strain, Sprain 3,602
Upper Trunk Strain, Sprain 3,186
Face Laceration 2,987
Hand Contusions, Abr. 2,851
Foot Contusions, Abr. 2,540
Upper Trunk Contusions, Abr. 2,340
Head Concussion 2,260
Head Contusions, Abr. 2,229

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 93.3% (144,871)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 4.9% (7,548)
Left Without Being Seen 0.8% (1,260)
Treated And Transferred 0.5% (758)
Held For Observation 0.5% (735)
Unknown, Not Stated 0.0% (71)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 57 · Female · Lower Trunk · Nerve Damage · 2024

57 YOF WAS PUTTING A TOWEL IN THE DRYER INJURED LOW BACK DX: SCIATICA

Age 50 · Female · Upper Trunk · Other · 2024

50YOF WAS LOADING THE DRYER WHEN SHE FELT PAIN IN HER CHEST. DX: UPPER TRUNK PAIN.

Age 70 · Female · Lower Trunk · Fracture · 2024

70YOF FOR EVAL OF RIGHT HIP PAIN. SHE HAS CHRONIC GAIT INSTABILITY. SHE LOST HER FOOTING TODAY, FELL BACKWARDS & LANDED ON DRYER. DID NOT STRIKE HEAD OF LOC. DX: INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE OF RIGHT HIP

Age 80 · Male · Upper Arm · Fracture · 2024

80YOM AT HOME INSTALLING A DRYER LOST FOOTING AND FELL LANDED ON L SHOULDER DX HUMERUS FRACTURE

Age 78 · Female · Upper Arm · Fracture · 2024

78 YOF GROUND LEVEL FALL, HIT DRYER THEN FLOOR C/O KNEE AND SHOULDER PAIN DX CLOSED FX HUMERUS, KNEE PAIN

Age 46 · Male · Foot · Other · 2024

46 YOM MOVING DRYER DROPPED DRYER ON FOOT OUT OF BACK OF TRUCK DX FOOT PAIN

Age 34 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

34YOM PATIENT WAS WORKING ON HIS DRYER WHEN HE CUT HIS FINGER ON A PIECE OF METAL OF THE DRYER DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT INDEX FINGER WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY WITHOUT DAMAGE TO NAIL

Age 11 · Female · Lower Arm · Other · 2024

11 YOF C/O LOWER ARM INJURY S/P WAS PLAYING WITH SIBLING AT A LAUNDROMAT AND FELL AGAINST A DRYER. DX: LOWER ARM INJURY

Age 80 · Female · Head · Concussion · 2024

80YOF PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER THE PATIENT HIT HER HEAD ON THE DRYER DOOR COMPLAINING OF HEAD PAIN AND FEELING OFF. DX: HEAD PAIN, CONCUSSION

Age 32 · Female · Head · Concussion · 2024

32YOF,HIT HEAD ON DOOR OF DRYER DIZZINESS,DX:CONCUSSION

Age 44 · Male · All Parts Body · Anoxia · 2024

44 YOM STATES HIS DRYER CAUGHT FIRE IN HIS BASEMENT AND HE WAS EXPOSED TO THICK BLACK SMOKE FOR 5 MINUTES WHILE RUNNING IN AND OUT TRYING TO PUT THE FIRE OUT, COHGB NOT DONE, OXYGEN SATURATIONS 95%, UNKNOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT. DX: SMOKE INHALATION

Age 56 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

56 YOM CUT LEFT INDEX FINGER ON A PIECE OF METAL WHILE MOVING A DRYER, DX: FINGER LACERATION

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/3/2012 · Incident, No Injury · ELECTROLUX/WHITE CONSOLIDATED · Washington

My Frigidaire Clothes Dryer had a fire in the control panel. Fortunately, the fire self extinguished with no damage to my laundry room. I had smelled an odd smell and went down to the basement laundry room to investigate. The dryer is ruined. Frigidaire Model #LEQ215ESO (Item purchased Winter of 2008 from Lowe's, Seattle, WA)

9/24/2013 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. (SEA) · Unspecified

Samsung front load dryer is less than 5 years old and the manufacturer welded seam in the drum has separated causing a users hand or arm to be cut on the sharp metal when loading or unloading items from the dryer. I have contacted Samsung and they are hiding behind the warranty and not standing behind the manufactures defect.

9/23/2016 · Incident, No Injury · WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION · Massachusetts

About 2-3 months ago the consumer's wife noticed that the dryer was taking hours to dry clothes. In August 2016 the dryer stopped working and the consumer contacted a third party technician to repair the dryer. The consumer states that some electronic parts were replaced. The consumer states that the dryer began working but shortly after the consumer's wife noticed that the dryer was still taking 2 hours to dry their kids work out clothes. The consumer contacted the third party technician again and he inspected the dryer about 2 weeks ago. The technician advised the consumer that the dryer had a lot of lint build up near the compressor and engine. The consumer was advised that this presents a fire hazard. The technician contacted Whirlpool to inquire about repair methods and the technician was told that this was a design and could not be repaired. The consumer contacted Whirlpool to inquire about this safety hazard and the consumer states the Rep. (name unknown) advised him that the dryer was out warranty. The consumer was also informed that page 11 in the manual states that the dryer should be cleaned every 2 years. However, the consumer believes the design poses a fire hazard and the dryer has been having this problem shortly after purchase. The consumer states that the technician cleaned the dryer but he is worried about using the dryer. Sometime in August 2015 a technician inspected the dryer because the dryer was taking very long to dry clothes. The consumer was advised that the settings were changed to dry at a higher temperature.

9/2/2025 · Incident, No Injury · SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. (SEA) · Tennessee

Samsung dryer, model # DVE52A5500W/A3 caught fire inside a residence. The homeowner purchased the dryer and had it installed by Lowe's in March 2025. The fire was contained to the insode of the dryer and appears to have ignited in the area of the thermal cut-off on the heating element. There was no interior damage to the structure and no injuries. The dryer was in use at the time of the incident. No previous issues were reported by the homeowner.

9/14/2015 · Incident, No Injury · Sears Holdings Management Corporation · New Hampshire

On Saturday 12 September 2015 after comments from my wife[REDACTED] concerning the continued overheating of our clothes (too hot to touch at the end of the cycle) in our Sears HE 5T (with steam option) dryer I decided to clean the vent. This is something I do twice a year usually around the Time change in October when I also replace the batteries in my smoke alarms. After a thorough cleaning of the vent and the back of the dryer I noticed what I would describe as a burnt rubber smell I thought it might be the drive belt so I took the top of the dryer off and was shocked with what I observed!!! The electronic module/controller/wire harness was melted and had also melted the plastic protective controller directly on top of the module (pictures are available). Despite this defect/flaw the dryer should no Error code (Trouble code as we call it in the automotive world) and the dryer continued to operate and operate at excessive temperatures! This in my mind put my family at risk for a fire and or shock hazard. There is no way in my mind that this dryer should have continued to operate without a warning or thrown a circuit to stop this dryer. I took the pictures to my local Fire Department H/Q in Londonderry, NH and there the battalion chief was equally shocked (no pun intended) about this device being melted and suggested that I report to the manufacture and Consumer Product Safety Commission.

9/13/2020 · Incident, No Injury · LG Electronics, USA · Illinois

This was a new product [clothes dryer]; awesome look; but the item; was subpar; and it caught fire; Not only do we, reasonably, need a refund to my mother who is the mom of this [REDACTED] manager; who was the purchaser; owner; I saw there; While living next-door to the laundry; Although, maybe on a few occasions; the lint and other parts assorted in fire; and I knew it was resorted to Sears or whatever; the issue; I guess the issued reason it didn't uphold; not to the Washer; and I think I heard that Washer bang so loud it sounded like an Industrial Airplane fan; And I'm telling; this is horrid;

9/13/2012 · Incident, No Injury · LG Electronics, USA · Michigan

Caller purchased her dryer in September 2006, she didn't notice any problems with it until around 2009 when it began being much hotter than necessary. She is reporting that her dryer that is not recalled is running at temperatures high enough to have at times burned her clothing and has blackened the vent in the back of the dryer. No matter what setting she uses (which lately is the smart selection) however if she sets it to only five minutes the clothes are too hot to enable touching them. She would like this dryer inspected and recalled and would request a complete repair at manufacturer expense.

9/10/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Sears Holdings Management Corporation · Texas

My dryer seems to be heating too hot. Clothes smell burnt even when drying on permanent press. Kenmore model 96429100. It may be a potential fire hazard.

Showing 8 of 155 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to clothes dryers, not specified on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Laundry & Household Appliances

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Clothes Dryers, Not Specified: cross-group products nearest on danger score (37/100), estimated annual ER visits (7,762/yr), and hospitalization share (5.5%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Clothes Dryers, Not Specified ranks #313 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #243 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does clothes dryers, not specified rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, clothes dryers, not specified ranks #313 by PlainSafety danger score (37/100) and #243 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (7,762/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from clothes dryers, not specified?

The most common injury is strain, sprain to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 16,691 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from clothes dryers, not specified increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for clothes dryers, not specified injuries?

The 25-34 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 30,257 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by clothes dryers, not specified?

Of all ER visits involving clothes dryers, not specified, approximately 5.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (94.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with clothes dryers, not specified?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Clothes Dryers, Not Specified is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.