Other Unpowered Garden Tools
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Lawn & Garden Equipment · CPSC Code 1403
Down 22% over 5 years
The verdict
Other Unpowered Garden Tools carry a danger score of 40/100 (moderate risk), driven by roughly 25,175 ER-treated injuries a year that are declining by about 22% over the last five years.
- 40/100
- danger score (moderate risk)
- 25,175
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 5.5%
- end in hospital admission
- 45-54
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 1403 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 40/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for other unpowered garden tools - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume25,175 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)5.5%
- Fatality rate0.09%
- 5-year trend-22%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Other Unpowered Garden Tools (CPSC product code 1403, in the Lawn & Garden Equipment category) generate an estimated 25,175 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 503,492 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 40/100 for this category (moderate risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are declining by about 22% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2014 (29,818 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (17,808 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for other unpowered garden tools is strain, sprain to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 44,431 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by other to the lower trunk (31,856 cases). The 45-54 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 77,551 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 5.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.09%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 9 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how other unpowered garden tools fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 12,258 | 6,122 | |
| 5-14 | 37,340 | 17,701 | |
| 15-24 | 30,031 | 9,709 | |
| 25-34 | 36,840 | 17,336 | |
| 35-44 | 47,562 | 21,796 | |
| 45-54 | 50,515 | 27,036 | |
| 55-64 | 40,174 | 29,703 | |
| 65-74 | 35,652 | 24,303 | |
| 75+ | 31,589 | 27,766 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Foot | Puncture | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Shoulder | Strain, Sprain | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Upper Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Shoulder | Other | |
| Foot | Laceration | |
| Wrist | Strain, Sprain | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
23YOM FOR EVAL OF L RIB/LUQ PAIN.DID A LOT OF SHOVELING (ROCKS) BOTH MON & TUES.TUESDAY EVENING HE DEVELOPED PAIN.PAIN WORSE W/COUGH OR DEEP BREATHING. DX: MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
38YOM C/O BACK OR FLANK PAIN. PATIENT HAS CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN WITH ACUTE FLARE AFTER LIFTING A SHOVEL. PATIENT LEFT AMA DX: NO DIAGNOSIS
66YOM PT PRESENTS WITH LACERATION TO THE FACE. LACERATION BIRDGE OF NOSE, BETWEEN EYES, ABRASION LT EYE. SPLITTING WOOD WITH A METAL WEDGE AND WEDGE HIT HIM IN THE FACE. DX: LACERATION TO LEFT CHEEK.
53YOF REPORTS WITH LOW BACK PAIN AFTER RAKING LEAVES AND LIFTING HEAVY BAGS. DX LOW BACK PAIN
55YOM C/O BACK PAIN FOR LAST 1-2 WEEKS. WAS SHOVELING SNOW AND HAS PERSISTED SINCE THEN. PAIN LOCALIZED IN THE LUMBAR REGION. SCANS WERE NEGATIVE. DX: STRAIN OF LUMBAR REGION, BACK MUSCLE SPASM
11 YOM ACCIDENT HIT W/SHOVEL DX; R BROW LAC
80YOM WAS USING A SHOVEL THREE DAYS AGO TO DIG UP DIRT AND HEARD A POP AND DEVELOPED PAIN IN LEFT FOOT DX: LEFT FOOT PAIN
71YOM PRESENTS WITH CONTINUING LOW BACK PAIN AFTER DIGGING A TRENCH WITH A PICK AXE 1 WEEK AGO DX: LOW BACK BACK
77YOM WAS DIGGING IN HIS GARDEN WHEN HE PASSED OUT DX: SYNCOPE
81YOM WAS OUTSIDE IN THE HEAT DIGGING IN HIS GARDEN WHEN HE DEVELOPED NAUSEA VOMITING DX DEHYDRATION
32YOM, COMPLAINING OF PERSISTENT RIGHT SIDED LOW BACK PAIN BEGAN 3 WEEKS AGO WHILE BENDING DOWN AND DIGGING A GRAVE FOR A RECENTLY DECEASED PET, DX: ACUTE RIGHT SIDED LOW BACK PAIN WITH RIGHT SIDED SCIATICA
70YOM WAS SHOVELING AND DEVELOPED PAIN IN CHEST DX: CHEST PAIN
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
product: Ames True Temper spading fork #1812200 UPC: 0 49206 18122 9 I bought this tool new at Lowe's Home Improvement Center, 09/11/2011. I first used this tool 09/18/2011. While using this tool to turn loose soil in my garden, the pin that secures the "D" handle to the end of the handle broke, or came loose, and then protruded about .5 inch. I didn't notice this immediately, and continued to use the tool. The next time I thrust the tool into the ground and it met resistance, my hand slipped along the handle, and the protruding pin ripped through my skin and muscle of my right hand between thumb and forefinger, causing me a painful injury requiring first aid.
Product Name: Unfinished Metal Hand Rake Seller: Temu Purchase Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Price: Approximately $7 Issue Type: Potential metal fragment contamination and infection risk Injury Date: July 15, 2025 (symptoms began within 1 hour of handling) Location of Incident: St. Petersburg, FL Medical Response: Antibiotic treatment (Cephalexin 500 mg, twice daily for 7 days); physician evaluation on July 16, 2025 Injury Details: Rapid swelling, redness, and sharp elbow pain ~1 hour after contact with tool No visible cuts or entry wound, but marked inflammation across arm and wrist Ongoing tracking with daily photos and circumference measurements (wrist, forearm, elbow, armpit area) Partial improvement with antibiotics, systemic discomfort continues No fever recorded, though personal medical history shows limited fever responses Product Concern: The rake was unusual in that it had no plastic or wood handle: entirely unfinished bare metal Possible unsealed or untreated surface may have released metal fragments, leading to subdermal infection No safety warnings were provided on packaging Action Taken: Seller contacted (Temu), and a refund was issued without acknowledgment of product fault Continued symptoms have prompted this safety report to inform potential investigation and prevent harm to others Notes: I am submitting this report without definitive proof that the product caused my injury, but the temporal connection and absence of other exposures strongly suggest it as the likely source.
-I got injured while using a product for its intended use -a gardening tool -I was using the product -it was being used to remove weeds in a sweeping motion -injuries did occur -as I was using the tool the metal handle of the tool snapped, this happened while I was doing a sweeping motion towards my body, so when the tool broke it hit my leg and created a deep cut that bleed continuously and required medical attention.
We recently purchased a Sun-Mar rotating barrel composter (model 400). On one end of the composter is an external gear that goes around the circumference of the barrel. At some point our 2 year old son put one one his fingers in the gear area when one of our other kids started rolling the barrel around. We had to take our 2 year old to the emergency room because the tip of his middle finger was hanging on by a small flap of skin. My son had to get x-rays done to make sure the bone wasn't broken. The x-rays didn't show any broken bones. The ER doctor informed us that she would need to sediate our son as she would need to remove his nail to make sure that there wasn't any damage to the nail bed. The doctor had to put in 9 or 10 stitches in my son's finger. The next day my husband sent an email to Sun-Mar telling them what happened and asked what we can do to cover up the gear area. My husband has not heard anything from the company.
My husband was digging out a shrub in our backyard with a 1 year old YardWorks brand shovel. As he was pushing down on the shovel to lift the small shrub out of the hole the shovel snapped in half and hit him in the face. He was fortunate that his teeth, nose, eyes were okay. He had a laceration that went all the way through his lower lip. We called 911 and went to the emergency room where required 15 stitches. I am just concerned about this shovel since it wasn't old (we had it for only one year). Also, he wasn't misusing the shovel or exerting an unusual amount of force. He had dug around the shrub and loosened it to the point that it simply needed to be propped out of the hole. We still have the shovel and can take a picture of it if needed. I hope this was an isolated incident but I also don't want this to happen to anyone else. Thank you.
On February 25,2015 I purchased a Black & Decker hand trowel from Walmart. I arrived home and a few hours later attempted to remove the product packaging that was affixed with a zip tie, a very tight, black zip tie. It was difficult to get the tip of the scissors up under the zip tie because it was excessively tight, so I stuck the pointed tip of the trowel down onto the driveway to get some leverage. The trowel was upright in my left hand and kitchen scissors were in my right, as I was attempting to get the tip of the scissors under the tie, my right hand slipped and smashed down onto the back edge of the trowel, the part most people would assume to be blunt, it wasnt. There was a crescent shaped divot out of the right side of the back of the trowel, and its nearly razor sharp. That is exactly where my right forefinger smashed into, I pulled the trowel away and out of my finger, exposing what I thought looked like bone. I freaked out not understanding how this could of happened, I thought I had broken the trowel when I looked at the razor sharp divot. Luckily I had neighbors who came to my rescue, they were as perplexed as I was as to why this trowel was like this. I understand now it is to remove roots and such, in a backward motion. My concern is it was not labeled to perform this function, not anywhere on the packaging, and the placement of product label obscured the sharp edge. I had no idea it was there. It is extremely dangerous and has caused me a lot of grief. I am a manager of a hair salon so my fingers are very important. I have not been able to work for 10 days now and am concerned because I don't have all the feeling in my finger back. This product needs to be labeled differently and I wish we would ban zip ties!
I lacerated my thumb using Fiskars multipurpose snippers when trying to cut ivy in my yard.
No injury yet, I just found out that LOWES home improvement stores are selling, post hole digger tools with attached STEEL handles, these tools should only have NON-CONDUCTIVE handles to avoid electrocution when a person digs into hidden underground electric lines. this has a huge potential to kill many people. I have experience working for a fence company and the 811 ground markings are not accurate and buried objects get hit quite often. the LOWES product= Item #863601 | Model #CA-38S-K34708
Showing 8 of 9 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to other unpowered garden tools on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are other unpowered garden tools?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, other unpowered garden tools have a danger score of 40/100 (moderate risk). An estimated 25,175 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from other unpowered garden tools?
The most common injury is strain, sprain to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 44,431 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from other unpowered garden tools increasing or decreasing?
Down 22% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for other unpowered garden tools injuries?
The 45-54 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 77,551 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by other unpowered garden tools?
Of all ER visits involving other unpowered garden tools, approximately 5.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (94.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with other unpowered garden tools?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Lawn & Garden Equipment
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 40/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 45-54 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.