CPSC NEISS · code 481

Bread Making Machines

Bread Making Machines: danger rank #735 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #777 of 838 (84 estimated ER visits a year; roughly flat over the last five years).

Containers, Tableware & Packaging CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Bread Making Machines ranks #735 of 838 by danger score (27/100) at ER-volume #777 of 838 (84/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#735
danger rank of 838
#777
ER-volume rank of 838
27/100
danger score
84/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (27/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

27 Among the lowest lower than 88% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 39/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

B
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 5 44th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 84 7th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +6% 74th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 15 53rd 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 1,264 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 481. Segments sum to 1,264 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Containers, Tableware & Packaging group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Containers, Tableware & Packaging danger scores

1. Waste Containers, Trash B…45/1002. Knives, Not Elsewhere Cla…44/1003. Drinking Glasses, Cups, A…42/1004. Cookware, Not Specified42/1005. Manual Cleaning Equipment…41/1006. Kitchen Gadgets, Not Else…41/1007. Unpowered Coffee Makers O…41/1008. Bread Making Machines27/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10027/100
PlainSafety danger score · Bread Making Machines

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 27/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for bread making machines - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 84 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 5.2% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend+6%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for bread making machines are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2016 (222 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2024 (8 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 207 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by fracture to the finger (112 cases). The 25-34 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 383 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 5.2% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 15 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how bread making machines fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

050100150200250 20052007200920132015201720222024 8
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Bread Making Machines, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 74 8 82
5-14 6 15 21
15-24 55 194 249
25-34 76 307 383
35-44 66 166 232
45-54 16 130 146
55-64 16 0 16
65-74 0 80 80
75+ 0 57 57

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 207
Finger Fracture 112
Lower Arm Laceration 90
Finger Amputation 80
Finger Contusions, Abr. 77
Upper Trunk Contusions, Abr. 74
Toe Contusions, Abr. 72
Finger Burns, Thermal 70
Foot Other 64
Neck Strain, Sprain 64
Head Internal Injury 57
Lower Trunk Strain, Sprain 42
Hand Laceration 40
Hand Burn, Electrical 37
Shoulder Strain, Sprain 32

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 89.2% (1,127)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 6.3% (80)
Held For Observation 4.5% (57)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 19 · Female · Lower Leg · Laceration · 2024

19 YOF C/O LOWER LEG LACERATION S/P TRIP AND FALL AGAINST AN OLD RUSTY BREADMAKER MACHINE FROM A THRIFT STORE AT HOME. DX: LOWER LEG LACERATION

Age 56 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2023

56YOM WAS MOVING A BREAD MACHINE AND CUT HIS FINGER DX; LT INDEX FINGER LACERATION

Age 210 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2023

10MOF WAS PLAYING WITH BROTHER AND GOT FINGER CRUSHED IN A BREAD MAKER LID. DX FINGER LAC AND AVULSION

Age 42 · Male · Hand · Contusions, Abr. · 2022

42YOM, ACCIDENTALLY SCRAPED HAND ONTO A BREAD MIXER, DX: CONTUSION OF RIGH HAND

Age 20 · Male · Finger · Fracture · 2022

20 YOM REPORTS YESTERDAY, USING A DOUGH MACHINE AND HIS FINGERS GOT CAUGHT IN THE MACHINE. DX: FINGER FX

Age 30 · Female · Wrist · Other · 2022

30YOF, GOT HAND CAUGHT AND TWISTED IN BREAD MIXER MAKING PIZZA C/O DX: PAIN IN WRIST

Age 16 · Male · Lower Trunk · Other · 2022

16YOM REPORTS HE WAS CLEANING HIS ROOM AND UPON STANDING HE FELT A SUDDEN SHARP PAIN TO IS RT LOWER QUADRANT. DX:RLQ ABDOMINAL PAIN

Age 2 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2021

2YOM MOTHER STATES SHE WAS WORKING IN KITCHEN AND CHILD PUT HIS HAND INSIDE OF A BREAKMAKER AND CUT FINGERDX LACERATION LEFT LONG FINGER

Age 39 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2017

39 YOM CUT L HAND, 2ND FINGER W/ BREAD MACHINE. DX: FINGER LAC

Age 72 · Female · Upper Leg · Fracture · 2017

72YOF RT HIP PAIN, TRIPPED OVER A CORD ON HER FLOOR, FELT HIP POP WHILEFALLING DX-CLOSED DISPL OBLIQUE FX SHAFT RT FEMUR, FALL

Age 49 · Female · Lower Arm · Laceration · 2016

R FOREARM LAC/49YOWF AT HM TRIPPED & FELL FORWARD SCRAPING R FOREARM ONMETAL PIECE THAT IS BROKEN ON HER BREAD MAKER.HAS R ARM LAC.

Age 38 · Female · Foot · Other · 2016

38YOF DROPPED A BREAD MAKER INTO FOOT. FOOT PAIN*

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

8/10/2020 · Incident, No Injury · Sunbeam Products, Inc. d/b/a Jarden Consumer Solutions · Michigan

My Oster CKSTBR9050 breadmaker was built so unstable that it wiggled off the counter while in operation and broke. I e-mailed Newell Brands about an issue with its Oster breadmaker on 4/12/20. When I never received a response, I contacted Newell Brands through Twitter 4/22/20. They said they'd respond back to me via e-mail. They never did. My subsequent messages sent to them via Twitter were ignored. I filed a BBB complaint, but Newell Brands ignored that too. Newell needs to replace the breadmaker.

7/7/2013 · Incident, No Injury · Zojirushi America Corporation · Unspecified

This is not to report an acute safety hazard risk, such as causing an immediate injury. It's rather a longer term health hazard, up to including consumer poisoning from aluminum. I'm owner of a bread machine (Manufacturer: Zojirushi Model: BB-PAC20 Home Bakery Virtuoso) After 15 months of use; I noticed that one of the paddles (or "kneading blade" - in Zojirushi terms) stopped rotating while kneading. I removed the paddle and noticed that it's notch completely worn out. So the rotation of shaft was not transferring to paddle any longer. The other paddle was also just about to loose the connection as well. I'll try to attach a picture to my report (if your system allows it - otherwise please email me so I can send it to you). If you look at my picture; you'll see that 15 months old paddle next to a brand new one. You'll see the notch on the new paddle. Thickness of it is about 1/8". That tiny notch is the only contact point where the strong torque of powerful 100W motor is transferred to paddle. While the rotating shaft is made out of machined stainless steel, paddles feels like cast from some aluminum compound (it's very light and soft). So within time and under heavy pounding of rotating shaft; that paddle notch wears out by means of aluminum shavings. Consumer eats those metal shavings in their bread. Two important points with that design: 1) While rotating shaft is made of machined stainless steel, paddles are not. 2) Rotating shafts are about 1" long. Why Zojirushi keep that paddle notch at only 1/8" thickness and not the full length of that shaft? Then the pounding impact would have much larger surface to transfer - hence much less (even totally eliminated) abrasion on the paddle. Combined end result is; aluminum shavings in your bread. I contacted online customer support of Zojirushi USA and asked if they are considering redesigning of those paddles. I have their email reply, stating that they don't consider such a change. That's an unacceptable hea

7/6/2014 · Unspecified · Spectrum Brands, Inc. · Michigan

I had started the basic bread cycle on my bread machine, which I had used two times previously with no problems, and about 5 minutes later, I smelled something burning. The heating coils were bright red and the water and bread mix were not mixed at all, but charred. I believe the bread machine overheated and could have caused a fire if I hadn't unplugged it. Smoke billowed out when the lid was open, and part of the plastic on top of the lid had melted.

6/9/2024 · Incident, No Injury · Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. · West Virginia

Made maple oatmeal bread in a Hamilton Beach type BM07 bread maker model 29881. Noticed a black ring around the bread where the paddle in the bread maker had been located. Discovered the teflon lining the bread pan had been scraped off by the paddle and the teflon sludge was baked into the bread.

6/6/2011 · Incident, No Injury · WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION · Michigan

I was cleaning a Magic Chef breadmaker when I noticed that the plastic finish on the breadmaker lid was cracked and chipping into the main baking compartment. Pieces of the plastic had fallen into the bread container and onto the heating elements.

6/24/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Applica Consumer Products, Inc. - NOTIFY SPECTRUM BRANDS · Virginia

I was using my Breadman Ultimate Plus breadmaking machine, and it rocked itself off the counter and came crashing down to the floor while in its first kneading cycle.

4/28/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. · Michigan

Hamilton Beach Breadmaker #29888 walked itself off my counter full of bread dough and crashed to floor breaking itself, while unattended

3/31/2014 · Incident, No Injury · Sunbeam Products, Inc. d/b/a Jarden Consumer Solutions · Mississippi

The heating element in the breadmaker overheated. The outer covering of the heating element is visibly damaged. We were home and were able to unplug the unit. If left unattended, the unit would have started a fire.

Showing 8 of 15 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to bread making machines on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Containers, Tableware & Packaging

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Bread Making Machines: cross-group products nearest on danger score (27/100), estimated annual ER visits (84/yr), and hospitalization share (5.2%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Bread Making Machines ranks #735 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #777 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does bread making machines rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, bread making machines ranks #735 by PlainSafety danger score (27/100) and #777 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (84/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from bread making machines?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 207 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from bread making machines increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for bread making machines injuries?

The 25-34 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 383 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by bread making machines?

Of all ER visits involving bread making machines, approximately 5.2% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (94.8%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with bread making machines?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Bread Making Machines is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.