CPSC NEISS · code 218

Electric Or Battery-powered Knives

Electric Or Battery-powered Knives: danger rank #735 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #656 of 838 (334 estimated ER visits a year; declining by about 17% over the last five years).

Kitchen Cooking Appliances CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Electric Or Battery-powered Knives ranks #735 of 838 by danger score (27/100) at ER-volume #656 of 838 (334/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#735
danger rank of 838
#656
ER-volume rank of 838
27/100
danger score
334/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (27/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

27 Among the lowest lower than 88% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 25/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

B
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 2 10th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 334 20th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -17% 39th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 11 50th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 6,684 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 218. Segments sum to 6,684 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Kitchen Cooking Appliances group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Kitchen Cooking Appliances danger scores

1. Refrigerators43/1002. Ranges Or Ovens, Not Spec…42/1003. Gas Ranges Or Ovens41/1004. Microwave Ovens40/1005. Other Ranges Or Ovens39/1006. Electric Knife Sharpeners39/1007. Dishwashers39/1008. Electric Or Battery-power…27/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10027/100
PlainSafety danger score · Electric Or Battery-powered Knives

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 27/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for electric or battery-powered knives - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 334 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 1.5% Low admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-17%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for electric or battery-powered knives are declining by about 17% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2010 (616 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2022 (17 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 5,155 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the hand (312 cases). The 55-64 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 1,582 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 1.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 11 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how electric or battery-powered knives fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

0200400600800 20052008201120142017202020232024 352
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Electric Or Battery-powered Knives, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
5-14 49 23 72
15-24 482 290 772
25-34 790 367 1,157
35-44 521 517 1,038
45-54 522 516 1,038
55-64 1,051 531 1,582
65-74 376 136 512
75+ 229 284 513

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 5,155
Hand Laceration 312
Finger Avulsion 297
Lower Leg Laceration 268
Finger Amputation 121
Foot Laceration 103
Wrist Laceration 93
Lower Arm Laceration 84
Upper Leg Laceration 81
Finger Fracture 72
Toe Laceration 68
Face Burns, Thermal 15
Lower Arm Burn, Scald 15

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 97.7% (6,532)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 1.6% (109)
Treated And Transferred 0.4% (28)
Left Without Being Seen 0.2% (15)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 43 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

43YOM WITH LACERATION OF THUMB FROM CUTTING A TURKEY WITH ELECTRIC CUTTING KNIFE. DX: LACERATION FINGER

Age 62 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

62YOF-PATIENT WAS CUTTING SOME TOMATOES ON THE ELECTRIC KNIFE AND SLIPPED AND CUT HER LEFT RING FINGER. DX: LACERATION FINGER

Age 18 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

18YOF PRESENTS AFTER USING AN ELECTRIC KNIFE AT HOME LACERATING HER RT INDEX FINGER X2 AND LT WRIST. DX: LACERATION

Age 9 · Male · Finger · Amputation · 2024

9YOM PT WAS USING AN AUTOMATIC CUTTER/KNIFE WHEN HIS FINGER WAS STUCK INSIDE HA PARTIAL FINGER AMPUTATION OF RT INDEX FINGER TODAY DX: PARTIAL TRAUMATIC AMPUTATION OF FINGER THRU PHALANX

Age 31 · Male · Lower Leg · Laceration · 2023

31YOM C/O CUT LOWER LEG, WHEN TRIPPED ON CORD OF ELECTRIC FILLET KNIFE FELL OFF TABLE TOP CUTTING LEG. DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT LOWER LEG.

Age 42 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2023

42 YOM WAS USING AN ELECTRIC KNIFE TO SLICE BRISKET TONIGHT WHEN IT SLIPPED CUTTING FINGER. DX: LACERATION MIDDLE FINGER LEFT HAND.

Age 22 · Male · Lower Leg · Laceration · 2023

22 YOM WAS CUTTING TURKEY WITH AN ELECTRIC KNIFE AND THE KNIFE SLIPPED BECAUSE HE IS INTOXICATED WHEN HE STABBED HIMSELF ACCIDENTALLY IN THE RIGHT LEG. BAL 157DX: LACERATION RIGHT LOWER EXTREMITY

Age 61 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2023

61YOF COMPLAINS OF LACERATION TO HER FINGER. STATES SHE WAS USING ELECTRIC KNIFE TO CUT COLLARD GREENS WHEN SHE SUBSEQUENTLY CUT HER LEFT POINTER FINGER. DX: LACERATION OF LEFT INDEX FINGER WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY, NAIL DAMAGE STATUS UNSPECIFIED

Age 28 · Female · Finger · Fracture · 2023

28YOF WITH LEFT MIDDLE FINGER LACERATION AFTER CLEANING AN ELECTRIC KNIFE WHEN IT TURNED ON DX: LEFT MIDDLE FINGER DISTAL PHALANX FX

Age 13 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2023

13YOF PRESENTS AFTER HER LEFT 3RD DIGIT GOT CUT WHILE USING AN ELECTRIC KNIFE FOR CUTTING ORANGES, ENDORSES SOME NUMBNESS TO FINGER. DX: FLEXOR TENDON LACERATION OF FINGER WITH OPEN WOUND

Age 20 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2021

20YOM CUT RIGHT INDEX FINGER WHEN CUTTING SOME PORK WITH ELECTRIC KNIFE. DX: LACERATION RIGHT INDEX FINGER

Age 33 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2021

33YOF, COMPLAINT OF LEFT HAND PAIN, STATES SHE WAS USING PASTA CUTTER AND LEFT HAND BECAME JAMMED IN THE MACHINERY. DX: LACERATION OF LEFT MIDDLE FINGER WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY, WITHOUT DAMAGE TO NAIL

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

8/2/2021 · Incident, No Injury · American Outdoor Brands Inc. · Minnesota

I received a Bubba Ion cordless fillet knife as a gift for Christmas last year (2020), since then I have used it 4 or 5 times (filleting at least 40 fish in all). The last two times I used it (Thursday July 29TH and Saturday July 31st), the trigger wouldn’t disengage after I removed my finger from it. I had to remove the battery to get the knife to stop. I searched online thinking there was a recall I wasn’t aware of. No recalls but I found plenty of other customer reviews reporting the same trigger issue dating all the way back to March of last year. The manufacturer is aware of the safety issue because they responded to one of the reviews on their website, and they sent a a replacement to [REDACTED] the customer that reported the issue in March 2020. So they have known about the issue for close to a year and a half and are still selling the product as is. They wouldn’t even accept a return from a customer in August of 2020 over the same issue. Both of these customers are verified purchasers, and this isn’t a third party seller on Amazon that I’m getting these reviews from. It’s the Bubba store. There’s even a video in one of the reviews (by [REDACTED] verified purchaser) that shows the safety issue in action. Does someone need to be injured before a recall takes place?

3/7/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Normark Corporation · Nebraska

Was recharging it over night and woke up to the smoke alarm with the knife fully engulfed in flames and a small explosion. Nothing was damaged other than smoke damage.

3/11/2024 · Incident, No Injury · Normark Corporation · New Mexico

Rapala R12 Electric Fillet Knife Trigger sticks and continues to run causes a serious safety issue.

2/3/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Normark Corporation · Unspecified

It says ‘may cause fire if using a charger that is not a rapala.’ Ours blew up and started a fire. It was the rapala charger that came with the knife. Just thought I should let you know the brand that started our fire. I contacted Rapala at the time of the incident.

2/18/2024 · No Incident, No Injury · ENERTWIST · California

Battery powered electric knife started a fire inside the drawer. Product was NOT in use, NOT being charged, it was just stored inside the original box.

12/28/2016 · Incident, No Injury · CONAIR CORPORATION · Pennsylvania

This caller is reporting a carving knife that he received Christmas Day 2015 as a laceration and electrical shock hazard. His wife was using the knife to carve the turkey when pieces came apart due to the motors & other parts becoming charged. She said that she did feel a very slight electrical shock then put the knife down. This knife is being reported not only as a shock hazard but also as a laceration hazard due to the potential of the unit to cut an individual as it flew apart. There are no injuries being reported at this time The caller did try to contact the manufacturer but had no success.

11/25/2012 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · Spectrum Brands, Inc. · Pennsylvania

Severe finger cut while inserting the blades into a Black & Decker EK700 electric knife. Insertion force is very high and the design of the blade guards which are small, streamlined and slippery, does not allow a firm grip on the blades. While attempting to push the blades into the knife body my hand slipped and the cut resulted. Directions were read and understood before attempting blade insertion. This is a very poor and very dangerous design. A similar issue exists for blade removal. The cut occurred when my hand slipped while attempting to push the blades in to the point that they locked in place. The knife was NOT plugged in when the incident occurred. In addition to this issues this product has another serious safety issue. The blade "trigger" which must be activated to use the knife is about the diameter of a ball point pen refill. It is too small to be easily activated with the same hand that holds the knife and using two hands puts the user in danger of cutting a hand or wrist when the knife activates.

10/27/2018 · Incident, No Injury · Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. · Georgia

Hamilton Beach electric carving knife model 74250. Trigger switch became difficult to turn on then once it was on, it sometimes kept running when the trigger was released. There is a danger of cutting yourself or unintended objects.

Showing 8 of 11 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to electric or battery-powered knives on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Kitchen Cooking Appliances

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Electric Or Battery-powered Knives: cross-group products nearest on danger score (27/100), estimated annual ER visits (334/yr), and hospitalization share (1.5%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Electric Or Battery-powered Knives ranks #735 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #656 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does electric or battery-powered knives rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, electric or battery-powered knives ranks #735 by PlainSafety danger score (27/100) and #656 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (334/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from electric or battery-powered knives?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 5,155 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from electric or battery-powered knives increasing or decreasing?

Down 17% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for electric or battery-powered knives injuries?

The 55-64 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 1,582 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by electric or battery-powered knives?

Of all ER visits involving electric or battery-powered knives, approximately 1.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (98.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with electric or battery-powered knives?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Electric Or Battery-powered Knives is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.