CPSC NEISS · code 1512

Diapers

Diapers: danger rank #256 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #357 of 838 (2,987 estimated ER visits a year; rising by about 15% over the last five years).

Nursery & Baby Products CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Diapers ranks #256 of 838 by danger score (38/100) at ER-volume #357 of 838 (2,987/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#256
danger rank of 838
#357
ER-volume rank of 838
38/100
danger score
2,987/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (38/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

38 Around the middle lower than 30% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 69/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

D
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 7 61st 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 2,987 52nd 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +15% 79th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 372 100th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 59,758 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1512. Segments sum to 59,758 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Nursery & Baby Products group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Nursery & Baby Products danger scores

1. Bassinets Or Cradles47/1002. Baby Bathtub Seats Or Rin…41/1003. Baby Baths Or Bathinettes41/1004. Cribs, Nonportable Or Not…40/1005. High Chairs39/1006. Diapers38/1007. Portable Baby Swings (for…38/1008. Portable Cribs38/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10038/100
PlainSafety danger score · Diapers

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 38/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for diapers - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 2,987 ER visits/yr Above median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 7.3% Above median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.01% Low fatality rate
  • 5-year trend+15%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for diapers are rising by about 15% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (4,425 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2008 (1,819 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 10,405 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by other to the lower trunk (3,972 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 38,904 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 7.3% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.01%) result in fatality.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 372 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how diapers fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

1K2K3K4K5K 20052008201120142017202020232024 4K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Diapers, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 20,572 18,332 38,904
5-14 903 410 1,313
15-24 475 1,892 2,367
25-34 1,702 3,972 5,674
35-44 963 1,753 2,716
45-54 462 913 1,375
55-64 368 1,256 1,624
65-74 232 1,033 1,265
75+ 1,000 3,491 4,491

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Head Internal Injury 10,405
Lower Trunk Other 3,972
Elbow Dislocation 3,922
Lower Trunk Strain, Sprain 3,156
All Parts Body Poisoning 2,126
Pubic Region Other 2,081
Pubic Region Contusions, Abr. 1,902
Lower Trunk Contusions, Abr. 1,591
Internal Ingestion 1,455
Face Contusions, Abr. 1,438
Upper Leg Fracture 1,400
Head Contusions, Abr. 1,157
Face Laceration 1,063
Upper Trunk Other 892
Not Stated/unk Other 886

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 90.9% (54,315)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 6.3% (3,775)
Treated And Transferred 1.2% (745)
Left Without Being Seen 0.9% (518)
Held For Observation 0.7% (400)
Fatality Incl. Doa, Died In Er 0.0% (5)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 201 · Male · Pubic Region · Other · 2024

8 WOM HAD CIRCUMCISION LAST WED PRESENTING W/CONCERN FOR PENILE LESION.PT HAD *** CIRCUMCISION PERFORMED,THIS FELL OFF 3-4 DAYS AGO,APPEARED NORMAL AT THAT TIME.THIS MORNING NOTED LESION ON THE TOP OF HIS PENIS.MAY HAVE BEEN FROM PRESSURE NEXT TO THE *** OR MAY BE FROM IRRITATION OF THE DIAPER. DX: LESION OF PENIS

Age 25 · Male · Lower Trunk · Strain, Sprain · 2024

25YOM PRESENTS WITH LOW BACK PAIN AFTER REPEATEDLY BENDING OVER CHANGING A DIAPER DX: LUMBOSACRAL STRAIN

Age 70 · Female · Lower Trunk · Fracture · 2024

70YOF WAS CHANGING HER GRANDDAUGHTERS DIAPER WHEN SHE HAD A SLIP AND FALL LANDING ONTO HER BUTTOCKS DX:COMPRESSION LOWER BACK

Age 2 · Male · Elbow · Dislocation · 2024

2YOM PRESENTS AFTER HIS MOTHER WAS CHANGING HIS DIAPER AND HAD A HOLD OF HIS ARM WHEN HE FELL BACKWARDS, PULLING ON THE ARM INJURING HIS LEFT ELBOW. DX: NURSEMAID'S ELBOW OF LEFT UPPER EXTREMITY

Age 3 · Male · Pubic Region · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

3YOM C/O DRIED BLOOD TIP OF PENIS, SORE THROAT, ECZEMA TO BUTTOCKS, WEARS *** DX: STREPOCOCCAL TONSILITIS, ABRASION TO PENIS, ECZEMA

Age 215 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

15MOF WAS HOLDING ONTO A WINDOW BLIND WHILE GETTING HER DIAPER CHANGED, WAS PICKED UP WHILE STILL HOLDING ONTO BLIND AND IT CUT HER FINGER, DX LAC TO FINGER

Age 201 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

20 DOF WAS HAVING HER DIAPER CHANGED ON THE FLOOR BY PARENTS WHEN 1 1/2-YEAR-OLD BROTHER TRIPPED AND STEPPED ON HER HEAD. DX: TRAUMATIC INJURY OF HEAD

Age 219 · Female · Elbow · Dislocation · 2024

19MOF DAD WAS CHANGING HER DIAPER WHEN SHE TRIED TO ROLL OVER AND LEFT ELBOW POPPED OUT OF PLACE DX: NURSE MAIDS ELBOW

Age 207 · Female · Upper Leg · Fracture · 2024

7MOF WAS HAVING A DIAPER CHANGED WHEN SHE STARTED CRYING NOW WILL NOT BEAR ANYWEIGHT ON LEFT LEG DX: LEFT FEMUR FRACTURE

Age 203 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

3MOF WAS GETTING HIS DIAPER CHANGED ON HIS MOMS BED WHEN HE ROLLED OFF STRIKING HEAD ON THE FLOOR DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY

Age 5 · Male · Pubic Region · Other · 2024

5YOM PRESENTS WITH PENILE REDNESS AND DISCOMFORT FROM THE DIAPER TAPE. DX: POSTHITIS

Age 23 · Female · Lower Trunk · Nerve Damage · 2024

23YOF WAS BENDING DOWN CHANGING HER BABY'S DIAPER AND DEVELOPED PAIN DOWN LOWER BACK DX: SCIATICA

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/8/2025 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP. · Virginia

I wanted to bring a serious concern to your attention. My baby recently used Little Movers Plus diapers purchased at Costco, and after just a few uses, he developed a severe rash that looks like a chemical burn. He has never had diaper rash before, and this reaction was immediate. The box is opened, and I can provide the lot number and photos if needed. Im very concerned about the safety of this product and wanted to report this issue directly to you. Please advise on next steps. Thank you for your prompt attention.

9/6/2025 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP. · Texas

Formal Complaint to Huggies / Kimberly-Clark Product Concern: Huggies Snug & Dry Diapers, Size 5 To: Huggies Kimberly-Clark Corporation P.O. Box 2020 Neenah, WI 54957-2020 Phone: 1-877-648-2484 Email Contact: https://www.huggies.com/en-us/contact-us Corporate Contact: https://www.kimberly-clark.com/en-us/contact-us Subject: Urgent Safety Concern Regarding Huggies Snug & Dry Diapers and Severe Red Burn Reaction Dear Kimberly-Clark Team, I am writing to report a recurring and deeply concerning issue involving your Huggies Snug & Dry Size 5 diapers. Our 15-month-old baby has experienced repeated severe diaper burns this week after we just opened a new box of diapers. At first we were assuming this was just a rash. But upon closer inspection, we took note that this is obviously no rash. The reactions occurred despite our careful hygiene practices including frequent diaper changes, avoiding wipes, and using warm baths to soothe the skin. After researching online, we discovered multiple reports from other parents describing similar reactions allegedly linked to Huggies diapers: 1. Report of chemical burn-like rash from Huggies Little Movers [REDACTED] 2. Parent complaint about rash and raw skin after switching to new Huggies batch [REDACTED] 3. Class action alleging chemical burns from Huggies diapers [REDACTED] To mitigate the burn, we applied [REDACTED] Butt Paste and inserted a double-layered paper towel between the diaper and our babys skin before putting our baby in the crib for the night. When the baby woke up he did not urinate during the night as his diaper was dry. But amazingly, the burn was 100% completely gone. This method led to rapid healing overnight. Needless to say, I did not know there is a helpful visual guide that demonstrates this remedy when addressing rashes in general. [REDACTED] But to reiterate my complaint, we were not dealing with the rash we were dealing with a reddish chemical burn ap

9/5/2025 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · Zuru Inc. · Pennsylvania

My infant daughter began showing redness on her skin the morning after her first use of Mille Moon diapers. Within a couple of days, the redness progressed into what appeared to be a blister/chemical burn. I do not recall the exact day the blister first appeared, but I do have dated photos documenting the progression. Her pediatrician confirmed this was not a simple diaper rash and recommended specific treatment at home. The injury caused her pain and distress, and I have since stopped using the product. Update 9/25/2025: We ended up having to take our daughter in to the doctor to be prescribed two ointments to treat her wounds caused by the diapers. UPDATED ON 11/17/2025: [Millie Moon responded to my report and said they reviewed their production and inspection records for this batch but found no irregularities. They also stated that no further testing could be done because they had a limited number of retained samples. My child’s pediatrician confirmed that her skin reaction was caused by these diapers. I’ve decided to keep the remaining diapers and all documentation as evidence. I declined the company’s $100 [REDACTED] offer and storybook because I don’t consider this issue resolved. I want this added to my report in case other parents experience similar reactions.]

9/30/2013 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · The Procter & Gamble Company · Michigan

The caller stated that after using the diapers for about 2 months it caused blisters on her 4 month old child. She was not sure what was causing it at first until she changed it a few days ago , she noticed that the rash started to clear up. She visited her physician and she was advised to used a diaper rash ointment. The manufacturer was not contacted as yet. The caller is concerned that this diaper is unsafe and should be recalled.

9/3/2025 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · Walmart Stores Inc. · Massachusetts

Subject: Formal Complaint Regarding Contaminated Parents Choice Diapers To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to file a formal complaint regarding Parents Choice diapers, which I recently purchased. Upon opening the package, I discovered worms/foreign contamination inside the diapers, which poses a serious health and safety risk to infants. This product is intended for babies, and the presence of contamination is completely unacceptable. It raises significant concerns about quality control, manufacturing standards, and consumer safety. My primary concern is the potential danger to my childs health, as well as to other families who may unknowingly be using the same product. Details of the issue: Product: Parents Choice Diapers Date of Purchase: [insert date] Place of Purchase: [insert store/online platform] Lot/Batch Number (if available): [insert number] Description of Issue: Found worms/contamination inside sealed diapers I request that this complaint be taken seriously and investigated immediately. I would also like confirmation of what corrective actions will be taken to ensure such contamination does not happen again. Additionally, I am seeking information on how to return the contaminated product safely, receive a refund, and ensure accountability from the manufacturer. Please advise me on the next steps in this process. [REDACTED] Thank you for your prompt attention to this serious matter. Sincerely, [Your

9/3/2014 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · The Procter & Gamble Company · Georgia

We recently switched to Pamper's Cruisers and our baby daughter started to develop small hives around the edge of the diaper. We were not certain what was causing this until 2 days ago when she woke up in the morning whimpering in discomfort and we saw the bright red rash only on the front of her diaper area. She was so red, she had welts in the creases of her thighs where the edge of the diaper was touching. As soon as I removed the diaper the rash immediately spread upwards over her belly button where it stayed red for almost the full day. We contacted an advice nurse since this happened over Labor Day, and she confirmed it was a chemical burn/reaction to the diapers. The rash was over her hips and around her thighs anywhere the edge of the diaper touched- except for the back. Whatever ingredient/chemical this company is using in its cruiser line of diapers is hurting infants.

9/3/2011 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP. · Unspecified

My son came home from pre-school with blue streaks on his inner thighs and a diaper rash. I was able to use a little rubbing alcohol to remove the streaks. After his bath his legs were streak free. When I went to change his diaper before bed, I noticed the blue streaks were back. I realized that the diapers lined up with the streaks. I called Huggies the next morning and they confirmed that they had a problem with that Lot number.

9/3/2011 · Incident, No Injury · The Procter & Gamble Company · Arkansas

My husband and I had taken our son swimming. We forgot to take his diaper off, so we took it off and threw it to shore. When we went to leave, my husband picked up the diaper, and when he squished it together, out popped a razor from the inside lining of the diaper. By the grace of God, it didn't come through while my son was wearing it.

Showing 8 of 372 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to diapers on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Nursery & Baby Products

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Diapers: cross-group products nearest on danger score (38/100), estimated annual ER visits (2,987/yr), and hospitalization share (7.3%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Diapers ranks #256 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #357 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does diapers rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, diapers ranks #256 by PlainSafety danger score (38/100) and #357 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (2,987/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from diapers?

The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 10,405 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from diapers increasing or decreasing?

Up 15% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for diapers injuries?

The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 38,904 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by diapers?

Of all ER visits involving diapers, approximately 7.3% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (92.7%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with diapers?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Diapers is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.