Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Artificial Christmas Trees ranks #419 of 838 by danger score (35/100) at ER-volume #431 of 838 (1,939/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #419
- danger rank of 838
- #431
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 35/100
- danger score
- 1,939/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (35/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
35 Lower than most lower than 50% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 56/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 7 | 59th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 1,939 | 47th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -7% | 56th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 36 | 65th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 38,776 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1701. Segments sum to 38,776 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Medical & Assistance Devices group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Medical & Assistance Devices danger scores
How this 35/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for artificial christmas trees - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 1,939 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 6.6% Above median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.06% Above-typical fatality rate
- 5-year trend-7%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for artificial christmas trees are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2014 (3,084 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (853 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is contusions, abr. to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 4,128 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by other to the lower trunk (3,485 cases). The 45-54 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 6,258 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 6.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.06%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 36 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how artificial christmas trees fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 922 | 644 | |
| 5-14 | 797 | 918 | |
| 15-24 | 649 | 1,659 | |
| 25-34 | 1,833 | 2,938 | |
| 35-44 | 2,039 | 3,314 | |
| 45-54 | 2,468 | 3,790 | |
| 55-64 | 1,786 | 3,760 | |
| 65-74 | 1,645 | 3,591 | |
| 75+ | 2,210 | 3,806 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Upper Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Trunk | Fracture | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Shoulder | Strain, Sprain | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Wrist | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Trunk | Nerve Damage | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
49 YOF C/O INJ TO EYE WHEN SHE WAS POKED IN THE EYE BY A BRANCH ON HER ARTIFICIAL CHRISTMAS TREE AT HOME DX CORNEAL ABRASION
53 YOF FELL WHILE DECORATING CHRISTMAS TREE, C/O RT WRIST PAIN DX: COLLES FX
80YOM LOST HIS BALANCE AND FELL HIT THE BACK OF THE HEAD AFTER TRIPPING OVER A WALKER. DX: CONTUSION TO THE BACK OF THE HEAD.
73YOF COMES IN WITH PAIN. SHE IS ON INHOME DIALYSIS AND STARTED HAVING ABDOMINAL PAIN.AND WAS TOLD MY HER MD TO COME TO THE ER FOR EXAM OR POSSBLE PERITONEAL INFECTION OR HERNIA . SHE DENIES TRAUMA BUT STATES SHE WAS LIFTING AND CARRYING A BUNCH OF THINGS LAST WEEKEND WHEN PUTTING AWAY CHRISTMAS TREE. DX: HERNIA UMBILICAL; CHRONIC FAILURE RENAL END STAGE RENAL DISEASE DIALYSIS DEPENDENT.
63YOM PRESENT TO ED W/ EXERTIONAL CP WAXING/WANING 2WK WORSENING TODAY WHILE TAKING DOWN THE CHRISTMAS TREE/ORNAMENTS.W/ DYSPNEA ON EXERTION,SOBDX:CP UNSPECIFIED;EXERTIONAL CP
74YOF WAS WORKING ON TAKING DOWN HER CHRISTMAS TREE ON WEDNESDAY & WOKE UP ON THURSDAY WITH RIGHT SHOULDER PAIN. DX: RIGHT SHOULDER PAIN, MUSCLE SPASM OF BACK
5MOM PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER THE PATIENT BECAME ITCHY AFTER AN ARTIFICIAL TREE WAS PUT UP IN HOUSE COMPLAINING OF RASH ON TORSO, FACE, BACK, AND ARMS. DX: RASH, FUSSINESS IN BABY
25YOF WAS GIVEN A ARTIFICIAL CHRITMAS TREE BY HER MOTHER & 1 HR LATER BROKE OUT IN A RASH ON ARMS & NECK DX HIVES, ALLERGIC REACTION
^60 YOF BIBA FOLLOWING FALL WHEN TRYING TO TRANSFER FROM HER VAN TO HER WHEELCHAIR, C/O PAIN TO LEFT LEG, DOES NOT TAKE BLOOD THINNERS, DX; LEG PAIN
61YOF C/O LEFT HIP PAIN S/P PUTTING UP HER CHRISTMAS TREE AT HOME. DX: LEFT HIP PAIN
40YOF C/O THROAT ITCHING & SWELLING WHILE TAKING AN ARTIFICIAL CHRISTMAS TREE OUT OF A BOX. DX: ALLERGIC REACTION
59YOF WAS PUTTING UP A CHRISTMAS TREE AND TRIPPED OVER A RUG AND FELL LANDING ONTO OUTSTRETCHED RIGHT ARM DX: FRACTURED RIGHT FOREARM
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
My color changing cord sparked and stopped working. I returned and replaced the tree now the cord is recalled.
I just received an email regarding the tree we purchased last year. I didn't file a report until now because we ended up bypassing the hazard. The tree had been up and running in our livingroom for a few days and sitting a few feet away, late at night, I smelled something burning. The odor was stong enough that it led me directly to the button portion of the tree's power cord. I was nearly burned disconnecting the power source and noticed a large burn hole in our tree skirt on the floor. I knew I'd probably saved a few lives that night. We decided instead of returning the tree just days before Christmas, we would run it without the button, meaning white lights only and pack it up after the holiday. No issues since but to know that at least 500 people could've been in danger is obviously a reason to recall.
Caller stated that he experienced problems with the artificial christmas trees he purchased in 2012. The failure of electrical wiring was noticed in December 2013 when the tree was being assembled again, the lights were extremely hot when it was plugged in. One of the trees was never opened but when it was plugged in the lights started to bubble from overheating. (12/2013 - 1/2014)The retailer was contacted but he was informed that someone would contact him, no one did and he felt that they were not willing to assist him. During the times that he had contacted the store he has been transferred through different departments. Caller feels that the christmas trees are a fire hazard and should be reported.
I bought a Christmas tree from Qvc call the Bethlehem lights 7.5ft ready shape no fail lights Christmas tree . the bottom lights all burned out they just stopped working but the rest of the lights on the tree worked. there must be a short somewhere . But its at the bottom and from what I hear there is a recall on this item. so I am so afraid to use this item in my house knowing there is a chance it can set on fire specially since im already seeing the lights shorting out
The plug on Christmas tree purchased in Lowe's in 2019 and used in 2020 overheats when plugged in. I tried to resolve this issue with the company. They sent replacement branch that was dirty and also with faulty lights. They fail to care about the issue to resolve it properly. The cords that overheats is the main cord that is plugged in directly to the outlet and supplies power to all the lights on the tree. Without this, none of the lights can be enjoyed on the tree. After a lot of back and forth emails with polygroup, there is still no solution and many households can be at risk from this plug that overheats! Polygroup does not seem to truly care about this issue. They did not find a good solution and had no shame sending a replacement branch that had faulty lights and was dirty- looked like a return as well. Since the step on and off special addition to the cord is used to turn the lights on and off, many households may not be aware that the plug that is plugged in to the outlet overheats and is hazard risk. I only found out when I directed my teen to unplug the tree and he could not unplug it becuase it was so hot. I immediately turned the power off to the outlet and told him not to use the lights, which is a bit difficult to understand for a teen who was looking forward to having all the lights on during the Christmas season, especially during the pandemic. The tree was used in 2019, but the overheating was discovered in 2020.
I purchased a GE Holiday Lights Christmas tree from Lowes. We purchased the Just Cut Aspen Fir with 700 LED lights which is model 01619 UPC 8-03993-1619-1. The tree is VERY heavy. When we put the tree into the stand that was provided, one of the legs of the stand broke off and the tree came crashing down. If our four year old daughter had been standing there it could have killed her. When we examined the stand, the leg was severed off. We have owned a GE tree for the past 12 years. We began having issues with the lights on our previous tree so we decided to buy a new one. The stand that came with the last tree was much sturdier. The new stand was thin and flimsy. I contacted the company and they seemed concerned. The person told me to send them a picture of the broken stand. She said she was going to forward it immediately to the President of the company who was in China meeting with the manufacturer. She promised to let me know what they were going to do. When I called them back they said it was up to their manufacturer in China. This is an extreme hazard!
Electrical control unit for our Christmas tree got very hot, and quit working. It is recalled. I have filled out the manufacturer (Willis Electric) provided online replacement form, but have not received a replacement part or heard back from them.
Part of foot pedal showed burn mark and the lights stopped working
Showing 8 of 36 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to artificial christmas trees on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Medical & Assistance Devices
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Artificial Christmas Trees: cross-group products nearest on danger score (35/100), estimated annual ER visits (1,939/yr), and hospitalization share (6.6%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
- Photographic Equipment Home Structures & Construction Materials 1,935/yr
- Gas Fumes Or Gas Vapors Of Unknown Origin Building Materials & Home Structures 1,934/yr
- Badminton (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) Sports Protective Equipment & Gear 1,948/yr
- Snow Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) Sports & Recreation Equipment 1,922/yr
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Medical & Assistance Devices
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Artificial Christmas Trees ranks #419 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #431 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does artificial christmas trees rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, artificial christmas trees ranks #419 by PlainSafety danger score (35/100) and #431 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (1,939/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from artificial christmas trees?
The most common injury is contusions, abr. to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 4,128 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from artificial christmas trees increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for artificial christmas trees injuries?
The 45-54 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 6,258 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by artificial christmas trees?
Of all ER visits involving artificial christmas trees, approximately 6.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (93.4%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with artificial christmas trees?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.