Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Wooden Matches ranks #762 of 838 by danger score (26/100) at ER-volume #751 of 838 (109/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #762
- danger rank of 838
- #751
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 26/100
- danger score
- 109/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (26/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
26 Among the lowest lower than 91% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 41/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 9 | 72nd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 109 | 9th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -50% | 12th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 21 | 56th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 2,180 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1730. Segments sum to 2,180 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Medical & Assistance Devices group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Medical & Assistance Devices danger scores
How this 26/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for wooden matches - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 109 ER visits/yr Low volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 9.1% High admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-50%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for wooden matches are declining by about 50% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2011 (372 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2006 (15 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is contusions, abr. to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 711 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by foreign body to the ear (348 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 903 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 9.1% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 21 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how wooden matches fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 143 | 184 | |
| 5-14 | 681 | 222 | |
| 15-24 | 159 | 30 | |
| 25-34 | 46 | 108 | |
| 35-44 | 15 | 46 | |
| 45-54 | 30 | 219 | |
| 55-64 | 34 | 64 | |
| 65-74 | 137 | 0 | |
| 75+ | 67 | 0 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Ear | Foreign Body | |
| Eyeball | Burns, Thermal | |
| Face | Burns, Thermal | |
| All Parts Body | Anoxia | |
| Ear | Internal Injury | |
| Ear | Other | |
| Ear | Puncture | |
| Finger | Foreign Body | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Eyeball | Foreign Body | |
| Finger | Burns, Thermal | |
| Hand | Burns, Thermal | |
| Foot | Puncture | |
| Mouth | Foreign Body |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
47 YOF WAS HAVING LEFT EAR IRRITATION AND USED A MATCHSTICK TO SCRATCH THE EAR, IT BROKE AND CAUSED A WOUND. DX: TRAUMATIC RUPTURE OF LEFT EAR DRUM.
13YOM C/O LIT A MATCH STICK TO LIGHT FIREPLACE AND ACCIDENTALLY INHALED SOME OF THE SMOKE FROM MATCH STICK. NO ASH, BURNS, OR AIRWAY COMPROMISE NOTED. LEFT BEFORE EVALUATION. FD UNK DX: UNKNOWN
87YOM TO ER W/ DAUGHTER FOR EPISTAXIS, PT HAD YESTERDAY & AGAIN TODAY, PT ON ***, DAUGHTER TRIED USING MATCH STICK X 1 DAY TO CAUTERIZE, UNSUCCESSFULL, DX EPISTAXIS [RESOLVED] CHRONIC AFIB, ANTICOAGULANT LONG TERM USE
20YOM HIT HIMSELF IN THE EYE WITH A PUNK THAT YOU LIGHT FIREWORKS WITH RESULTING IN AN ABRASION TO HIS CORNEA. DX: ABRASION OF LEFT CORNEA
24YOM WAS IN JAIL AND SET HIS JAIL CELL ON FIRE WITH MATCHES. FIRE DEPARTMENT CAME TI SCENE. LABS COHB 7.3. DX INHALATION INJURY
2YOM STUCK A MATCH STICK UP INTO HIS RT NARE DX FOREIGN BODY IN NOSE
4YOM WHO WALKED INTO A PUNK WITH THE HOT POINT HITTING HIS LEFT EYE. DX: ABRASION OF LEFT CORNEA.
2YOF WITH LEFT EYE PAIN AND DISCHARGE AFTER BEING POKED IN THE EYE WITH A PUNK. MOTHER BELIEVES ANOTHER CHILD REACHED HIS HAND BACK WITH THE LIT PUNK AND ACCIDENTALLY HIT HER IN THE EYE. DX: ABRASION OF LEFT CORNEA.
6YOM HAS EYE PAIN AFTER HE WAS ACCIDENTALLY POKED IN THE EYE WITH A LIT PUNK FOR FIREWORKS DX: EYE BURN.
7 YOM WAS USING A *** TO LIGHT FIREWORKS (TYPE R) AND ACCID CONTACTED EYE W/LIT ENT OF ***.DX: L EYE CORNEAL ABR.
48 YO F PT WAS USING A WOODEN MATCH STICK TO REMOVE EAR WAX FROM RT EARPAINFUL DX RT EAR PAIN
6YOM WAS POKEN IN THE LEFT EYE WITH A PUNK AFTER BENDING DOWN WHILE COUSIN WAS LIGHTING FIREWORKS, FIREWORK TYPE R DX CORNEAL BURN, LEFT EYE
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
The matches I purchased are unsafe. The match stick is too thin and while striking on the box, they light but then break and have almost caught my shirt and skin on fire before falling to the ground. Obviously I cant catch the match to prevent it burning something.
Using poorly made and unsafe kitchen matches. They are constantly breaking while I'm striking them on the box. Frequently, large broken and burning splinters and fragments are flying in my face and?or across the room. Last night a burning fragment flew across the room and landed on top of a power fixture and cord. They have several times flown back at my face and eyes.
The adult consumer was striking one of the wooden matches, when the stem snapped just as the match ignited. The match head landed on her 100% polyester shirt. The consumers shirt sustained a couple of burn holes. She said that the incident occurred so fast that she is not exactly sure how the incident happened. As she felt the heat on her shirt, she attempted to pull it way and the match may have continued to tumble down at that point. The consumer is not sure, but she believes that she may have caught the match on the shirt. Fortunately, the consumer did not sustain any burns. (8/31/11) The consumer called the brand name company listed in the mfr. section of this report. The consumer spoke with a rep. named [REDACTED] (last name unknown) and he indicated that he would report this to the buyer and a higher authority in his company.
CPSC Soy un consumidor y estoy reportando un INCIDENTE PELIGROSO con el producto Penley Matches en la presentacion de la caja de 250 wooden matches. Producto identificado: Dist. by Penley Corporation. PO Box 277, West Paris, Maine 04289 Made in India. El incidente peligros fue de que estos cerillos al momento de raspar (strike) en la caja para prenderlos la cabeza de estos se desprende y salta hacia varios lados, muchas veces hacia la cara de la persona que los esta prendiendo. El incidente mas peligroso le ocurrio a mi hermana, a la cual le brinco la cabeza del cerillo prendida al ojo, quien por el reflejo al parecer alcanzo a cerrar el ojo y al parecer lo que lesiono el cerillo (una quemadura) fue el area (de la cara) del ojo donde se encuentran las pestanas, sin dejar de ser esta una lesion peligrosa. Pensamos que habia sido una situacion poco comun, sin embargo usando los mismos cerillos a mi persona tambien me brinco los pedacitos de cerillo en la cara sin ocasionar en este caso una lesion, ya que se alcanzaron a apagar en el transcurso hacia mi cara. Al seguirlos usando nos dimos cuenta que en la mayoria de las veces estos pedazos de cerillos (las cabezas) se desprenden de los cerillos saltando hacia varios lados, y en muchos casos hacia la persona. Lo anterior ocurrio en la cocina de una casa habitacion, en la ciudad de Tijuana BC Mexico, frontera con San Diego CA lugar donde se compro este producto el cual consideramos peligroso. Mi nombre [REDACTED] 38 anos, y si pueden incluir mi reporte para la base de datos e investigaciones USA PMB address [REDACTED] CPSC Translation: CPSC, I am a consumer and would like to report a dangerous incident involving the Penley Matches box contains 250 wooden matches. ID: Dist. by Penley Corporation. PO Box 277, West Paris, Maine 04289 Made in India. When the matches are stroke against the box to light them, the lighted matchs head detaches and flyes in different directions. Often times, it h
I am using kitchen matches and they are unsafe because they break while in the process of striking them and this has happened before.
'EZ FLAMES' wooden match sticks(250/box) These matches ignite easily when struck on the box and frequently break in the process of striking them. On several occasions a FLAME was thrown. In the event the fire lands on a flammable surface it EASILY can start a fire. Fortunately I was able to quickly extinguisher the flame. The 'stick' portion is of such poor quality that this product ENDANGERS the consumer not to mention firefighters.
We had a box of wooden diamond batches. My wife accidentally dropped a closed box on the floor and before she could pick it up the box ignited from within. She poured water on it to stop the fire.
I bought 2 boxes of Penley wooden matches- 250 matches in each box- at a local dollar store, "Dollar Bazaar, 128 Grand St., Johnson City NY 13790, which has since closed. Recently when striking a match, the match broke in half causing the flaming half to drop onto the tablecloth. I quickly blew it out so that only a small charred spot was left on the plastic tablecloth and from then on kept a pitcher of water nearby if lighting candles. A match broke again a few days ago and I'm now soaking all of them in water in order to dispose of them safely. The match box states "Dist. by the Penley Corporation, PO Box 277,Paris, Maine 04289." They were made in India. I would guess that Penley may have gone out of business and sold off its stock to dollar stores, but these matches are a dangerous fire hazard and should be recalled and/or subject to warnings
Showing 8 of 21 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to wooden matches on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Medical & Assistance Devices
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Wooden Matches: cross-group products nearest on danger score (26/100), estimated annual ER visits (109/yr), and hospitalization share (9.1%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Medical & Assistance Devices
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Wooden Matches ranks #762 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #751 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does wooden matches rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, wooden matches ranks #762 by PlainSafety danger score (26/100) and #751 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (109/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from wooden matches?
The most common injury is contusions, abr. to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 711 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from wooden matches increasing or decreasing?
Down 50% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for wooden matches injuries?
The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 903 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by wooden matches?
Of all ER visits involving wooden matches, approximately 9.1% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (90.9%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with wooden matches?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.