Photographic Chemicals
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Home Workshop Tools & Equipment · CPSC Code 926
Up 280% over 5 years
The verdict
Photographic Chemicals carry a danger score of 29/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 54 ER-treated injuries a year that are rising by about 280% over the last five years.
- 29/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 54
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 0.0%
- end in hospital admission
- 15-24
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 926 - last data year 2021.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 29/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for photographic chemicals - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume54 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)0.0%
- Fatality rate0.00%
- 5-year trend+280%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Photographic Chemicals (CPSC product code 926, in the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment category) generate an estimated 54 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 430 ER-treated injuries across the 17-year span from 2005 to 2021. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 29/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are rising by about 280% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2009 (107 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2016 (15 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for photographic chemicals is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 91 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by other to the eyeball (79 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 265 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 0.0% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 0 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 10 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how photographic chemicals fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2021-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2021)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 60 | 31 | |
| 5-14 | 0 | 57 | |
| 15-24 | 147 | 118 | |
| 25-34 | 0 | 16 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Lower Leg | Other | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| Hand | Other | |
| Wrist | Derma/conjunct | |
| Upper Leg | Burn, Chemical |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
14YOF W/ CHEMICAL BURN TO R THIGH DEVELOPING PHOTOGRAPHS IN SCHOOL W/ AGENT *** DEVELOPER,SPILLED TOR THIGH DX: CHEMICAL BURN THIGH
17 Y O F FB PHOTOGRAPHERS DEVELOPER SPLASHED IN HER EYE AT SCHOOL RN CALLED POISON CONTROLA AND CHEMICAL IS NON TOXIC
=33 YOF RASH TO BIL WRIST & RT FACE AFTER EXPOSED TO FILM DEVELOPINGCHEMICALS. DX CONTACT DERMATITIS
19YOF IS PHOTOGRAPHY STUDENT, USES SILVER NITRATE FOR DEVELOPING PHOTOSC/O HAND TURNING BLUE. DX - HAND DISCOLORATION 2ND TO CHEMICALS
15 YOF CONJUNCTIVITIS EYE AFTER EXPOSURE TO PHOTOGRAPHIC CHEMICAL FIXER
WART ON SHIN,READ SM AMT DINITROCHLOROBENZENE,WOULD CREATE IMFLAMMATORYRXN & DESTORY WART DX: CELLULITIS SHIN
PT INGEST ACETIC ACID( PHOTOGRAPHIC INDICATOR)
PT WAS WORKING WITH PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER AND SPLASHED LEFT EYE SUSTAININGCHEMICAL CONJUNCTIVITIS W/BURNING, REDNESS, BLURRED VISION
PT TRYING TO DEVELOPE OWN FILM AND GOT SOME CHEMICALS IN EYE C./O PAINBLURRED VISION AND REDNESS CORNEAL ABRASION LEFT EYE
PATIENT GOT PHOTO DEVELOPING SOLUTION IN EYE AT SCHOOL, EYE BURNING ANDRED; CHEMICAL CONJUNCTIVITIS
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to photographic chemicals on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are photographic chemicals?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, photographic chemicals have a danger score of 29/100 (low risk). An estimated 54 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from photographic chemicals?
The most common injury is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 91 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from photographic chemicals increasing or decreasing?
Up 280% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for photographic chemicals injuries?
The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 265 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by photographic chemicals?
Of all ER visits involving photographic chemicals, approximately 0.0% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (100.0%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with photographic chemicals?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 29/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 15-24 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.