Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Other Baby Carriers ranks #622 of 838 by danger score (31/100) at ER-volume #582 of 838 (613/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #622
- danger rank of 838
- #582
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 31/100
- danger score
- 613/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (31/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
31 Lower than most lower than 74% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 44/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 9 | 68th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 613 | 27th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -29% | 23rd | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 7 | 40th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 12,272 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1549. Segments sum to 12,272 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Nursery & Baby Products group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Nursery & Baby Products danger scores
How this 31/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for other baby carriers - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 613 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 8.5% Above median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-29%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for other baby carriers are declining by about 29% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2006 (1,427 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2019 (233 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 4,198 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by contusions, abr. to the head (1,246 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 10,373 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 8.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 7 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how other baby carriers fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 5,025 | 5,348 | |
| 5-14 | 29 | 0 | |
| 15-24 | 31 | 352 | |
| 25-34 | 190 | 928 | |
| 35-44 | 17 | 105 | |
| 45-54 | 73 | 0 | |
| 55-64 | 0 | 155 | |
| 75+ | 0 | 16 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Not Stated/unk | Other | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Fracture | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| All Parts Body | Other | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Wrist | Other | |
| Face | Other | |
| Head | Other | |
| Ankle | Fracture | |
| All Parts Body | Anoxia | |
| Head | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
3MOF PRESENTS WITH WORSENING PARIETAL HEMATOMA AFTER A FALL ~2 FEET TO TILE FLOOR FROM INFANT SEAT WHEN SIBLING TRIED TO PICK HER UP 2 DAYS AGO DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY WITHOUT LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS, FRACTURE OF PARIETAL BONE OF SKULL, HEMATOMA
2MOM PT SITTING IN GLIDER SEAT ON COUCH, SLID OUT OF GLIDER & FELL TO FLOOR, HIT HEAD DX: HEAD INJURY
1 MOF. HEAD IJURY AFTER FALLING OUT OF BABY CARRIER FROM A CARRIED POSITION & FELL ONTO HARDWOOD FLOOR. DX: FALL FROM FURNITURE; CLOSED HEAD INJURY
5MOM MOM WITH BABY IN A CARRIER ON THE FRONT OF HER WHEN SHE TRIPPED AND FELL AND THE BABY HTI HIS HEAD DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY
8MOF PRESENTED TO ED C/O FALL, PER GRANDMOTHER SHE WAS CARRYING THE BABY AND BENT OVER, CHILD FELL OUT OF FRONT CARRIER AND HIT HEAD ON FLOOR. DX; INTRACRANIAL INJURY, FRACTURE OF PARIETAL BONE
4MOF CLIMBED OUT OF AN INFANT SEAT ON THE COUNTER AND LANDED ON WOODEN FLOOR. DX: MINOR HEAD INJURY.
7MOF - MOM CARRYING PT IN A *** POUCH AND TRIPPED AND FELL. PT HIT HEAD. DX: HEAD INJURY
1 MOF PRESENTS WITH HEAD INJURY S/P DAD WAS HOLDING PATIENT IN A BABY CARRIER AND WHEN HE BENT OVER PATIENT HIT HEAD AGAINST A CHAIR AT HOME. DX: HEAD INJURY
2YOF FELL OUT OF A BACK-BACK TYPE BABY CARRIER AND HIT HEAD ON CEMENT. DX: HEAD INJURY
2MOF WAS AT HOME BEING CARRIED IN A BASKET BY DAD WHEN HE LOST ONE OF THE HANDLES AND SHE ROLLED OUT, FELL ABOUT 16 INCHES ONTO LAMINATE FLOORING. DX: CHI
6MOF - BABYSITTER CARRYING PT IN A FRONT FACING CARRIER STRAPPED TO BABYSITTER AND SHE FELL, PT HIT FACE ON THE GROUND. DX: FACE CONTUSION
4MOF PRESENTS WITH LEG PAIN. MOTHER REPORTS THAT THE PATIENT WAS RIDING IN A FORWARD-FACING CARRIER WHEN SHE NOTICED THE CARRIER WAS PRESSING INTO HER LEGS AND CAUSING THEM TO BECOME VERY RED WITH SMALL SPOTS OF DISCOLORATION. WHILE AT THE PARK IN A FRONT CHEST CARRIER, MOM NOTICED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEGS WERE BRIGHT PINK. DX: PURPURA, NONTHROMBOCYTOPENIC; CRADLE CAP; CHEST DEFORMITY.
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Issue Summary: This baby carrier poses multiple serious safety risks to infants, particularly those under 6 months of age. The product prioritizes aesthetic design and performative masculinity over proper ergonomic support, breathable materials, and newborn safety standards. It is marketed as a parenting tool but is functionally and structurally inappropriate for safe infant carrying. Detailed Hazards Identified: Suffocation Risk: Some baby positions press the infants face against the wearers chest or hard buckles, with no breathable fabric or airflow spacing. Photos from verified purchasers show babies with faces smushed and no visible support, especially dangerous for babies without neck control. Circulation Problems: Verified reviews report babies legs turning purple within minutes due to poor leg positioning and strap constriction. Hip Dysplasia Risk: The carrier fails to support the medically recommended M leg position for healthy hip development, instead suspending the baby with legs hanging nearly straight down (crotch-dangle position). Skin Damage: Reports of abrasions, cuts, and red pressure marks from rubbing against harsh materials and improperly padded edges. Head/Neck Strain: No adequate head or neck support for young infants. General Construction: Materials resemble tactical military gear, not baby-safe textiles. The product is rigid, heavy, and completely inappropriate for infant softness, flexibility, and comfort. The company claims this product meets all ASTM, CPSC, CPSIA safety requirements, yet numerous verified customer reviews - and clear visual evidence - contradict this. The seating position does not support infant hips, the face is frequently pressed against the parents body or buckles (posing a suffocation risk), and harsh materials cause visible skin damage. If this product truly passed CPSC safety requirements, it raises serious questions about the testing protocols or truthfulness of this compliance claim. I ur
Per police reports, on September 26, 2021, about 1000-1015 hours, the baby was given to his father and placed in an Ergo baby carrier. The baby was positioned facing his father. The father reportedly took the baby and their dog for a walk around the neighborhood. The baby's head, arms, legs, and feet were exposed. At some point, the head cover was placed over the infant's head. The father returned home between 1045-1100 hours and prepared to go out for the afternoon. He kept the baby in the carrier with him. At about 1200 hours, the father and mother left the home to take the baby and their sibling to the park. As the father went to remove the baby from the carrier, he noticed the baby was not moving. He took the baby to the mother who also observed the baby did not look right. When the parents tried to wake the baby up, they noticed blood coming from his nose. The mother called 911 and initiated CPR. EMS arrived on the scene and continued life-saving efforts. The baby was transported to Children's hospital for advance care but despite all efforts, the decedent was pronounced dead at 1300 hours.
My 5 1/2 month old daycare child flipped herself out of the seat and hit her head on the laminate floor causing a hematoma. I have never seen a recall for these seats until now and it's too late! These seats are very dangerous and they should never be sold ever! I have an older seat which did not have a seatbelt. I unfortunately bought the seat I have off of Facebook so I had no idea how unsafe it was! You have a product rating for 3 to 9 months and my daycare child was 5 1/2 months and they are not safe for any age child.
A child died while being carried in an Ergo Baby carrier. The infant was being carried in a forward facing position. The infant weighed just over 8 pounds. While not listed as the cause of death, improper use of the carrier could not be excluded as a contributing factor. The infant carrier in this situation did not come with an insert and the instructions stated an insert was not needed for a child weighing over 7 lbs, so it was being used correctly. In some Ergo Baby carriers, and insert is provided and is advised to be used for children weighing between 7-12 pounds. I can't help but wonder if an insert had been used with deceased baby, if the baby would have lived.
Upon second use of the product's sleep cover feature, the small buckle attaching the cover to the [baby] carrier broke, rendering the sleep cover useless. No immediate safety concern at the time, but certainly disappointing and made me cautious of using the carrier in future, so I discontinued use. Saw a friend recently post information regarding the recall, for the same reason I discontinued use.
A mother placed an infant/baby carrier on her chest. She placed/secured her 3 month old infant in the carrier. She was walking in the park on the way home. She stopped at the crosswalk and while waiting for the traffic light to change green, she looked down her infant and noticed the infant was not breathing/unresponsive. There was a bloody substance noticed around her nose and mouth area. Paramedics were called.
Tula explore baby carrier button that secures the baby in the carrier snapped in half. Thankfully my baby was not in the carrier when it happened and was not injured. However if the baby was in the carrier the baby couldve been injured. The baby carrier was in a cubby in the car when the button snapped. No trauma to the carrier. It just broke and when I went to put the carrier on it was broken.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to other baby carriers on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Nursery & Baby Products
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Other Baby Carriers: cross-group products nearest on danger score (31/100), estimated annual ER visits (613/yr), and hospitalization share (8.5%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Nursery & Baby Products
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Other Baby Carriers ranks #622 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #582 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does other baby carriers rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, other baby carriers ranks #622 by PlainSafety danger score (31/100) and #582 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (613/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from other baby carriers?
The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 4,198 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from other baby carriers increasing or decreasing?
Down 29% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for other baby carriers injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 10,373 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by other baby carriers?
Of all ER visits involving other baby carriers, approximately 8.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (91.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with other baby carriers?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.