CPSC NEISS · code 232

Electric Scissors

Electric Scissors: danger rank #735 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #787 of 838 (97 estimated ER visits a year; roughly flat over the last five years).

Kitchen Cooking Appliances CPSC NEISS through 2021

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2021, Electric Scissors ranks #735 of 838 by danger score (27/100) at ER-volume #787 of 838 (97/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#735
danger rank of 838
#787
ER-volume rank of 838
27/100
danger score
97/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (27/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

27 Among the lowest lower than 88% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2021

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 28/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

B
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 5 41st 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 97 8th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +8% 76th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 0 0th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 1,068 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 232. Segments sum to 1,068 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Kitchen Cooking Appliances group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Kitchen Cooking Appliances danger scores

1. Refrigerators43/1002. Ranges Or Ovens, Not Spec…42/1003. Gas Ranges Or Ovens41/1004. Microwave Ovens40/1005. Other Ranges Or Ovens39/1006. Electric Knife Sharpeners39/1007. Dishwashers39/1008. Electric Scissors27/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10027/100
PlainSafety danger score · Electric Scissors

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2021

How this 27/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for electric scissors - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 97 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 4.7% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend+8%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 17-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2021, injury counts for electric scissors are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2014 (172 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2006 (31 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 645 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by fracture to the finger (233 cases). The 45-54 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 324 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 4.7% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 0 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how electric scissors fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2021-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2021)

050100150200 20052006200720092010201120122013201420172021 85
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Electric Scissors, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2021

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
5-14 96 0 96
15-24 90 0 90
25-34 0 16 16
35-44 15 70 85
45-54 184 140 324
55-64 124 15 139
65-74 0 16 16
75+ 82 219 301

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 645
Finger Fracture 233
Lower Trunk Internal Injury 90
Hand Other 69
Elbow Laceration 16
Finger Amputation 15

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 91.6% (978)
Treated And Transferred 8.4% (90)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 82 · Female · Hand · Other · 2021

82YOF HAND & FINGER PAIN AFTER USING ELECTRIC SHEARS FOR LONG PERIOD OF TIME, DX: HAND PAIN & FINGER PAIN

Age 14 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2021

14YOM ELECTRIC SHEARS SLIPPED WHILE CUTTING BRANCHES--DX:LAC FINGER

Age 79 · Female · Finger · Fracture · 2017

79YOF OPEN FX FINGER USING ELECTRIC SHEARS

Age 18 · Male · Lower Trunk · Internal Injury · 2014

18 Y/O MALE STATES WAS STANDING NEXT TO HOUSE TRIMMING HIS MANS & WASPUSHED BY HORSE & FELL ON ELECTRIC SHEARS DX SPLENIC PERFORATION BOWELS

Age 77 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2014

77YO WHITE MALE WAS CLEANING ELECTRIC SHEARS & CUT LEFT FINGERDX FINGER LACERATION

Age 55 · Male · Finger · Fracture · 2013

55 YO M CUT FINGER WITH ELECTRIC SCISSORS. DX OPEN FINGER FRACTURE

Age 46 · Male · Finger · Fracture · 2013

46 Y O M FX FINGER HOLDING A SHEEP THAT HE WAS SHEARING AND IT PULLED AWAY

Age 25 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2012

DX LAC THUMB: 25YOF LAC TO LAT L THUMB F FABRIC SCISSORS, CUT L THUMB ON ROTORY BLADE

Age 55 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2012

55 YOM LACERATED LEFT THUMB WITH ELECTRIC SCISSORS

Age 49 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2011

49 YOF CUT THUMB WITH ELECTRIC SCISSORSDX: THUMB LACERATION

Age 48 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2010

48 YOF PT CUT LIF WITH ELECTRIC SCISSORS. AVULSION LAC LIF.

Age 55 · Male · Elbow · Laceration · 2010

55YOM WORKING OUTSIDE USING A PAIR OF ELECTRIC SHEARS SUSTAINED A LACERATION TO LEFT ELBOW

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to electric scissors on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Kitchen Cooking Appliances

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Electric Scissors: cross-group products nearest on danger score (27/100), estimated annual ER visits (97/yr), and hospitalization share (4.7%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Electric Scissors ranks #735 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #787 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does electric scissors rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, electric scissors ranks #735 by PlainSafety danger score (27/100) and #787 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (97/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from electric scissors?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 645 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from electric scissors increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for electric scissors injuries?

The 45-54 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 324 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by electric scissors?

Of all ER visits involving electric scissors, approximately 4.7% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (95.3%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with electric scissors?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Electric Scissors is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2021. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.