CPSC NEISS · code 1870

Window Sills Or Frames

Window Sills Or Frames: danger rank #256 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #138 of 838 (17,053 estimated ER visits a year; roughly flat over the last five years).

Building Materials & Home Structures CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Window Sills Or Frames ranks #256 of 838 by danger score (38/100) at ER-volume #138 of 838 (17,053/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#256
danger rank of 838
#138
ER-volume rank of 838
38/100
danger score
17,053/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (38/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

38 Around the middle lower than 30% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 46/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 3 26th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 17,053 80th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -9% 52nd 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 3 28th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 341,092 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1870. Segments sum to 341,092 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Building Materials & Home Structures group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Building Materials & Home Structures danger scores

1. General Home Or Room Invo…71/1002. Floors Or Flooring Materi…59/1003. Stairs Or Steps51/1004. Porches, Balconies, Open-…47/1005. Ceilings And Walls (inter…46/1006. Scaffolding46/1007. Doors, Other Or Not Speci…45/1008. Window Sills Or Frames38/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10038/100
PlainSafety danger score · Window Sills Or Frames

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 38/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for window sills or frames - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 17,053 ER visits/yr High volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.2% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-9%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for window sills or frames are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2014 (20,753 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2008 (13,704 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 68,872 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by internal injury to the head (58,594 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 136,755 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.2% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 3 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how window sills or frames fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

12K14K16K18K20K22K 20052008201120142017202020232024 20K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Window Sills Or Frames, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 89,539 47,216 136,755
5-14 39,163 22,507 61,670
15-24 11,563 15,437 27,165
25-34 10,315 9,898 20,213
35-44 6,889 9,746 16,635
45-54 7,831 9,227 17,058
55-64 7,538 9,898 17,436
65-74 7,656 10,358 18,014
75+ 9,146 16,980 26,126

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Face Laceration 68,872
Head Internal Injury 58,594
Head Laceration 54,920
Mouth Laceration 13,997
Face Contusions, Abr. 12,958
Head Contusions, Abr. 10,803
Head Concussion 7,465
Finger Laceration 7,378
Hand Contusions, Abr. 4,804
Upper Trunk Contusions, Abr. 4,300
Hand Laceration 4,143
Upper Trunk Fracture 3,504
Mouth Dental Injury 3,226
Lower Arm Laceration 3,051
Finger Contusions, Abr. 2,931

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 94.8% (323,467)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 2.7% (9,190)
Left Without Being Seen 1.4% (4,838)
Held For Observation 0.5% (1,806)
Treated And Transferred 0.5% (1,776)
Unknown, Not Stated 0.0% (15)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 18 · Female · Hand · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

18YOF PUNCHED A WINDOW FRAME AFTER BECOMING AGITATED. DX: CONTUSION OF RIGHT HAND.

Age 11 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

11 YOM TRIPPED FELL INTO WINDOW WELL STRUCK FOREHEAD DX INJURY HEAD, LACERATION EAR

Age 63 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

63YOF HAD UNWITNESSED FALL IN HER ROOM. SHE WAS FOUND ON THE FLOOR. STRUCK RIGHT SIDE OF HER HEAD PRESUMABLY ON THE WINDOW SILL. SHE THOUGHTS SHE'D GET OUT OF HER WHEELCHAIR. NO KNOWN LOC. DX: HEAD INJURY, HISTORY OF FALLING

Age 77 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

77YOF FELL STRIKING HEAD ON WINDOW SILL DX:CLOSED HEAD INJURY,LAC SCALP

Age 82 · Female · Upper Trunk · Fracture · 2024

82YOF HAD A MECHANICAL SLIP AND FALL STRIKING HER CHEST ON MARBLE WINDOW SILL DX:RIB FRACTURE

Age 219 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

19MOM TO ER W/ MOM AFTER PT FELL AT HOME 30 MINS AGO , PT WAS RUNNING TO GREET DAD WHO GOT HOME FROM WORK & PT FELL HIT HEAD ON WINDOW SILL W/ HEAD & EAR ON LEFT SIDE, BRUISING TO LEFT EARLOBE, INJURY OF HEAD DX INJURY OF HEAD

Age 43 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

43YOF C/O SCALP LACERATION AND HEAD INJURY S/P PT STATES SHE WAS IN THE BATHROOM AND TRIPPED ON HER CAT AND FELL BACKWARDS CAUSING HER TO HIT THE BACK OF HER HEAD ON THE WINDOW LEDGE AND FELL INSIDE THE BATHTUB. DX: SCALP LACERATION AND HEAD INJURY

Age 3 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2024

3YOM PRESENTS AFTER HIS CHIN HIT A WINDOW SILL. DX: CHIN LACERATION

Age 5 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

5 YOM HIT HIS HEAD ON A WINDOW SILL. DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY

Age 86 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

86YOF TRIPPED OVER AN EXTENSION CORD AND FELL STRIKING HEAD ON A WINDOW SILL DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY

Age 7 · Male · Head · Laceration · 2024

7YOM WAS PLAY WRESTLING W/ BROTHER WHEN HE GOT PUSHED AND FELL HEAD-FORWARD INTO WOODEN WINDOWSILL. DX: R FRONTAL SCALP LAC 1CM

Age 19 · Female · Head · Concussion · 2024

19YOF HIT BACK OF HEAD ON A WINDOW SILL. DX CONCUSSION

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

7/10/2024 · Incident, No Injury · Andersen Windows, Inc. · Alaska

Andersen Corporation window frame design presents an occupational safety hazard at temperatures below < 0F. Window frame water drainage design of secondary glider, results in a frozen air infiltration path with freezing of interior surfaces, in which the following occupational safety hazards occur: < 0F (-18C) Ice Formation / Freezing Surface Occurs [Secondary Glider Only] < 0F (-18C) Inoperable Opening / Blocked Egress [Both Gliders] Johnson et al., ANTI-SPUTTERING SILL SYSTEM AND METHOD U.S. Patent 2015/0159428 A1, Jun. 11, 2015. Note: * Occupational safety hazard of obstructed egress is same for all (7) of same window types installed. * IGU failure (Collapsed Window Pane / Negative Pressure) has occurred for 35% of installed type less than 6 months after installation. * Renewal by Anderson windows are only sold through their direct in-home design consultants See Attached PDF (CPSC SAFETY REPORT AND-N-146-02842-00001.pdf) For Further Details

11/5/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Ply Gem · Maryland

Hi, My name is[REDACTED], I’ve experienced many damaged channel balances / busted moldings / cracked trim sash strips and broken framing screws on several windows in my townhouse. When these windows are opened the channel balances can break unexpectedly, dropping the window down making a very loud crashing sound with a furious force that can cause injury/death to anyone near them. Classic Group built my townhouse with Ply Gem “Patriot 2400” windows that ultimately are defective/dangerous. My wife and I purchased the end unit townhouse from Classic Group 3/10/2010 in the Parklands development of Gaithersburg MD. Ply Gem has made several attempts/trips to our townhouse trying to fix/repair the damaged channel balances / busted moldings / cracked trim sash strips and broken framing screws to no real success… from the time of purchasing the house in 2010 All broken parts have continued to break again… resulting in the windows not being used!

1/14/2019 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · Henry Company · California

Blueskin Butyl Flashing by Henry was used in the installation of windows in our home November 5 and 6th. The flashing is applied on the inside and outside of the house. [REDACTED] adhesive was used on the flashing on the outside of our home between the flashing and the nail in windows. From the first day forward a strong chemical off-gassing came from the windows. It grew worse once the exterior wood was placed over the windows. After over two months the off-gassing has NOT subsided. We have been unable to be in our home for more than a few minutes at a time. We have symptoms of headaches (migraines), confusion, short term memory loss, sore throat, and difficulty breathing which seemed to be more cardiac than pulmonary from exposure. The loss of short term memory seems to be the longest symptom to resolve and I am still having symptoms. I have stopped entering my house for this reason. My husband clipped off a piece of the Blueskin Butyl Flashing from the inside of the house and put it in a sealed jar. This clipped had been stuck on the wood frame of the window, but not other adhesive used on this portion according to our window installer. We opened the jar outside the home and identified this as the same chemical that is permeating our home. Our concern is that the volatiles are in all the contents of our home including drywall and insulation at this point. The Blueskin Flashing was approved for use without the company divulging the major ingredients of the product. No information is available on the SDS regarding the volatile compounds used. It only lists it as" butyl compounds". We contacted them and they claim it does not smell, which is clearly false. They do not know what chemicals it interacts with or are safe to use with the product even though it is routinely used in homes along with other adhesives in the flashing. We had to move out of our home with our three children. We have had both financial, emotion and mental stress. We have had no help a

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to window sills or frames on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Building Materials & Home Structures

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Window Sills Or Frames: cross-group products nearest on danger score (38/100), estimated annual ER visits (17,053/yr), and hospitalization share (3.2%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Window Sills Or Frames ranks #256 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #138 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does window sills or frames rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, window sills or frames ranks #256 by PlainSafety danger score (38/100) and #138 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (17,053/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from window sills or frames?

The most common injury is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 68,872 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from window sills or frames increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for window sills or frames injuries?

The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 136,755 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by window sills or frames?

Of all ER visits involving window sills or frames, approximately 3.2% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.8%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with window sills or frames?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Window Sills Or Frames is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.