Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Molding Compounds ranks #482 of 838 by danger score (34/100) at ER-volume #394 of 838 (2,370/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #482
- danger rank of 838
- #394
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 34/100
- danger score
- 2,370/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (34/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
34 Lower than most lower than 57% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 41/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 2 | 10th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 2,370 | 51st | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | +5% | 74th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 19 | 55th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 47,429 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1376. Segments sum to 47,429 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Toys & Children's Recreation group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Toys & Children's Recreation danger scores
How this 34/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for molding compounds - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 2,370 ER visits/yr Above median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 1.4% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.02% Low fatality rate
- 5-year trend+5%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for molding compounds are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (4,532 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2007 (943 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is foreign body to the ear, accounting for approximately 21,400 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by foreign body to the face (12,775 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 30,055 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 1.4% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.02%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 19 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how molding compounds fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 14,846 | 15,209 | |
| 5-14 | 7,701 | 7,528 | |
| 15-24 | 303 | 157 | |
| 25-34 | 90 | 207 | |
| 35-44 | 257 | 303 | |
| 45-54 | 260 | 146 | |
| 55-64 | 0 | 193 | |
| 65-74 | 64 | 15 | |
| 75+ | 123 | 0 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Ear | Foreign Body | |
| Face | Foreign Body | |
| Internal | Ingestion | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Internal | Aspiration | |
| Hand | Derma/conjunct | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Face | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Foreign Body | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Head | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
9YOF PUT *** IN EARS. DX: FB EAR
6YOF P/W FOREIGN BODY IN EAR, PT STATES HER COUSIN PUT *** IN HER EAR, C/O DISCOMFORT, DX:FOREIGN BODY IN EAR
34YOM TO ED WITH C/O OF MOUTH FELLING FUNNY AND DRY, PT STATES ACCIDENTALLY TASTED HOME MADE *** MADE WITH GLUE AS ONE OF THE INGREDIENTS, DX DRYNESS OF MOUTH, (PT DID NOT INGEST SUBSTANCE)
9YOF HAD BEEN PLAYING WITH TOY ***, DEVELOPED RASH TO FACE, DX IRRITANT CONTACT DERMATITIS
3YOF, C/O FOREIGN BODY TO NOSE, PT SHOVED *** IN RIGHT NOSTRIL, DX:FOREIGN BODY RIGHT NARE
4 YOF PUT A PIECE OF *** IN HER RIGHT EAR, UNABLE TO REMOVE, DX: FOREIGN BODY EAR
2YOM PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER THE PATIENT WAS AT DAYCARE AND STUCK *** IN BOTH OF HIS EARS. DX: EAR PROBLEM
7YOF WITH SWOLLEN EUE AFTER PT PUT *** IN EYE AND MOTHER CLEANED OUT HER EYE DX: FB IN LEFT EYE
2YOF, MOM STATES PATIENT WAS PLAYING WITH *** AND WITH HER SISTER THEN NOTICED THAT THE LOWER EYELID APPEARED SWOLLEN, ATTEMPTED TO GIVE HER A BATH TO WASH THE EYE OUT YET THE SWELLING PERSISTED DX: E
3YOF MAY HAVE BEEN EATING *** AND DEVELOPED ABDOMINAL PAIN WITH FEVER DX: FEVER, CONSTIPATION
8YOF GOT SOME *** IN LEFT EYE CAUSING BURNING DX: IRRITATION TO LEFT EYE
3YOF PRESENTS AFTER SHE PUT A PIECE OF *** INTO HER RIGHT NOSTRIL. DX: FOREIGN BODY IN NOSE
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
On Thursday, 6/29/17 Flarp- Noise Putty (Pink) was purchased at a Five Below Store in Saratoga Springs, NY. My 6yr old daughter accidentally got some of it in her long hair and did not inform me. Approximately 1hr later it had dried and created a large snarly mess. I proceeded to rinse the product with cold water to start because it says DO NOT HEAT on the label and that did nothing but make it more sticky. I then shampooed her hair and while rinsing, I became immensely concerned when her hair literally fell off into the tub. THIS PRODUCT ATE THROUGH MY DAUGHTERS HAIR!!!! I did not attempt to brush it at all during this process so there was no reason other the product for her hair to broken off like that! This is extremely infuriating considering children are playing with this product- IT IS OBVIOUSLY TOXIC!
Hello, Thank you for your email. Shopatron only processes the online orders for many manufacturers. You would need to contact the manufacturer directly with your inquiry. There should be alternate contact information under the "Contact Us" page on the website. We apologize for the inconvenience. Regards, Shopatron Global Service Team http://www.orderhlp.com > moldy clay > ---------- > > Key: [REDACTED] > URL: https://jira.shopatron.com/browse/[REDACTED] > Project: Consumer Support > Issue Type: New Ticket > Reporter: [REDACTED] > Assignee: [REDACTED] > > Hello, I purchased 10 lbs. of terra cotta air dry clay from A C Moore in Warminster, Pa. on 7/20/2012. When I opened the box and bag(no twist tie on bag) on 7/23/2012I found mold on all four sides. I went to exchange it for a different box. Upon checking this box it also had mold it was the only one remaining. I was given a refund. I then went to A C Moore in Willow Grove, Pa. which had two boxes both of which were moldy. On 7/24/2012 iwent to Michael's in warrington, Pa., purchased another 10 lb. box of red air dry clay figuring different color and different store maybey different lot and no mold, I was very suprised to go home and open this box to also find mold. After many miles and so much time I decided to cut an inch or more to try to remove the mold wasting half the box of clay. Still some black spots in clay, not sure if its mold or not.I have made bricks(2000) and tile for floors (1000) for my 2 year old grand daughter and I would like to know if this clay is safe to use in a young childs doll house. Will this mold die once dried or will it come alive again when exposed to high humidity. P.S. Any information on this would be greatly appreciated.NONE OF THE BAGS HAD TWIST TIES OR SEALS OF ANY KIND. Thanks, [REDACTED]
On July 9, 2023 I purchased Elmer's Magical Liquid Slime Activator (Elmer's Magical Liquid 2.0) for my daughter to make slime with. Shortly after receipt of the product, my daughter started using it and, subsequently, her fingers broke out all over in small blisters which led to peeling and bleeding. I checked the safety data sheet for this product (SDS product code 2095928, date of issue of the SDS is 12/9/2020 (version 5)) and found out that this material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) for skin sensitization (category 1) and toxic to reproduction (category 1). The product is marketed as safe and non toxic however the safety information states otherwise.
My daughter received Kawaii Slime as a birthday gift. The packaging did not contain any warning labels for small parts, no batch number and no label or indication that it was safe or met the safety standards. When I went to the store where it was purchased, I was even more shocked to see "slime sprinkles" that looked like actual food sprinkles on the same rack which did not have any labeling not to eat it or whether it was non-toxic. This was very concerning as all of their products look like food and without the proper labeling (and testing) these products could contain unsafe levels of chemicals and could actually be consumed.
Bought Cra-z-art Nickelodeon Slime Party Pack at Five Below in Westminster, Md. the slime stuck to my sons skin and would not come off. It burned his skin and he had to be taken to urgent care for treatment.
my kid developed what looked like dyshidrotic eczema on fingers and lower arm after playing with Cra-Z-Art Cra-Z-Slimy Sparkle Fairy Slime, Purple for around 2 hours. The parts of her arms where the eczema bubbles appeared are the ones where the put the slime longer.
My six year old son played with an Anker Art product called Scenty's Slime Diner. This slime kit contained a "chili scented" slime which my son played with. He used the bathroom after playing with it, and rubbed his eyes as well after washing his hands. He experience an extreme burning sensation in both his pubic region and his eyes, that left him crying and writhing in pain for approximately two hours. At first I thought he was overracting, so I touched the slime breifly and touched my eye to make sure. My eye also burned for approximately two hours, as if I had touched it after cutting up habaneros. Tis product does not state that any food extracts are used, it also does not mention any food related hazards. It is apparent that this company uses food extracts in their "art" products. Some of the other slime "scents" include nut products, such as peanut butter. While this does not affect my children, this is concerning for others that may have deadly allergies.
6 year old female ingested Play-Doh between 01/31/2015-02/01/2015. She would not wake up on the morning of 02/01/2015. Medics were called and she taken to the hospital.
Showing 8 of 19 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to molding compounds on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Toys & Children's Recreation
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Molding Compounds: cross-group products nearest on danger score (34/100), estimated annual ER visits (2,370/yr), and hospitalization share (1.4%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Toys & Children's Recreation
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Molding Compounds ranks #482 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #394 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does molding compounds rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, molding compounds ranks #482 by PlainSafety danger score (34/100) and #394 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (2,370/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from molding compounds?
The most common injury is foreign body to the ear, accounting for approximately 21,400 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from molding compounds increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for molding compounds injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 30,055 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by molding compounds?
Of all ER visits involving molding compounds, approximately 1.4% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (98.6%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with molding compounds?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.