Fabric Treatment Products
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Home Workshop Tools & Equipment · CPSC Code 952
Down 28% over 5 years
The verdict
Fabric Treatment Products carry a danger score of 31/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 2,222 ER-treated injuries a year that are declining by about 28% over the last five years.
- 31/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 2,222
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 1.5%
- end in hospital admission
- 0-4
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 952 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 31/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for fabric treatment products - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume2,222 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)1.5%
- Fatality rate0.00%
- 5-year trend-28%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Fabric Treatment Products (CPSC product code 952, in the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment category) generate an estimated 2,222 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 44,432 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 31/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are declining by about 28% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2019 (3,145 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2010 (1,579 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for fabric treatment products is derma/conjunct to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 6,862 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by poisoning to the all parts body (5,747 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 11,838 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 1.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 60 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how fabric treatment products fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 7,522 | 4,316 | |
| 5-14 | 2,829 | 2,514 | |
| 15-24 | 2,543 | 3,259 | |
| 25-34 | 2,160 | 3,463 | |
| 35-44 | 1,668 | 3,530 | |
| 45-54 | 1,646 | 3,029 | |
| 55-64 | 914 | 1,575 | |
| 65-74 | 509 | 1,366 | |
| 75+ | 333 | 1,220 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| All Parts Body | Derma/conjunct | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Upper Trunk | Derma/conjunct | |
| Not Stated/unk | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| Face | Derma/conjunct | |
| Lower Trunk | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Lower Arm | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Burn, Chemical | |
| Lower Leg | Derma/conjunct | |
| Neck | Derma/conjunct | |
| All Parts Body | Other | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
10YOF WITH RASH TO SIDE OF STOMACH WITH ITCHING, POSSIBLE FROM NEW FABRIC SOFTENER DX ALLERGIC REACTION
84 YOF WAS WASHING LAUNDRY WITH A LAUNDRY STAIN REMOVER WHICH CONTAINS HYDROGEN PEROXIDE. AFTER SHE SCRUBBED HER CLOTHES SHE WENT TO PUT ON HER GLASSES. SHE HAD SOME FOAM ON HER HANDS WHICH CAME IN CONTACT WITH THE RIGHT EYE PERIORBITTAL AREA. NO CONTACT WITH EYEBALL ITSELF. DX: CHEMICAL BURN
3YOM W/R EYE IRRITATION & REDNESS AFTER EXPOSURE TO *** SPRAY. PTA,PT SPRAYED *** CLEANER INTO R EYE. HE SPRAYED THE EYE ONCE. HE APPEARED TO HAVE R EYE PAIN&THERE WAS REDNESS PRESENT. PARENT IRRIGATED AT HOME PTA. DX: CHEMICAL CONJUNTIVITIS OF RIGHT EYE
16MOM, ACCIDENTALY SPRAYED *** IN EYES, EYES FLUSHED BY PARENTS AT HOME, C/O EYES WATERING DX: ALKALINE EXPOSURE TO BILATERAL EYES
56 YOM GROUND LEVEL FALL, SLIPPED ON A DRYER SHEET, CRUTCHES SLIPPED ON IT FELL. DX CLOSED HEAD INJURY, HIP CONTUSION
52YOF PT USED A DRYER SHEET ON LAUNDRY; C/O RASH TO TRUNK DX: RASH, NONSPECIFIC ERUPTION, ELEVATED BLOOD PRESSURE
60YOF PRESENTING WITH HEADACHE. PER PT, SHE WAS IN THE BATHROOM AND REACHED ABOVE HER CABINET TO GRAB SOMETHING AND A FABRIC SOFTENER BOTTLE FELL AND HIT HIT HEAD. PT ALSO HAS NECK PAIN DX; ACUTE NONINTRACTABLE HEADACHE
5YOM PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER THE PATIENT COMPLAINS OF BOSY RASH. PER PATIENT'S MOM THEY STARTED USING NEW SOFTNER. DX: RASH, URTICARIAL RASH
3YOF PATIENT DRANK FROM A *** BOTTLE. DX: INGESTION OF TOXIN
85 YOF WAS DOING LAUNDRY 2 DAYS AGO WHEN SHE SPILLED *** LAUNDRY SANITZER NON-BLEACH FORMULA ONTO THE CUSHION OF HER WHEELCHAIR AND SAT IN IT FOR SEVERAL HOURS, NOW HAD WOUNDS AND ERYTHEMA TO BUTTOCKS. DX: PARTIAL THICKNESS CHEMICAL BURNS TO BUTTOCKS
50YOF, PRESENTING WITH DIFFUSE BODY HIVES ASSOCIATED WITH SOME WHEEZING THE ONLY NEW EXPOSURE THAT SHE CAN THINK OF IS A NEW FABRIC SOFTENER THAT BEEN USING LATELY DX: ALLERGIC REACTION
3YOM MOM USED DETERGENT WITH NEW SCENT BEADS AND HE DEVELOPED A RASH ALL OVER BODY DX: RASH
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Next door neighbors have been using fabric softener dryer sheets for past ten years(STARTING IN 2010 AND CONTINUES TILL TODAY 9.9.2019 )and the fumes waft across the front of the house. I have not been able to suggest to use an alternative that will not affect my well being ( I get immediate headaches, nausea and generally am debilitated by the fumes). We went to mediation in front of an officer of the law, to try to convince them that I am very sensitive to these fumes, and would they please try to find an alternative. They have not, they think that these fumes and the use of their products is " the way things are in the world" i.e. everybody uses it. I gave them a report how these chemical are especially toxic for their children. Putting a vent up thru their wall is costly, they say.
This product fabric softener is being used by many people in the belief that they are somehow making their clothes softer and more pleasurable smelling. When in reality they are exposing themselves and others to many chemicals that make those of us sensitive/allergic to it sick. I have suffered many symptoms from the exposure to this product, including, headches, nausea, asthma like symptoms of restricted breathing and chest congestion, inflamed sinuses. After many years of suffering with these symptoms have come to the conslusion with absolute certainty that these fabric softener products are the culprit.
I have been exposed to what I recently found out is a fabric softening called "Suavitel", and it is giving me many medical problems. But first, the smell from this product is overwhelming and obnoxious - everybody I know with the exception of the people who use it, call it a "STENCH" rather than a "smell". The people at work who use this product can be smelled from at least 20 feet away. When I am driving my car down the street past a laundrymat, I can smell this smell inside my car with the windows rolled up. Some of the various ailments that I have had since being exposed to this toxic stench, are severe headaches, bronchial airway closing, and inability to think. Honestly, I can't believe people haven't sued P&G regarding this product yet.
The consumer stated that this is the first time that she has used Bounce product. (08/12/2020) After wearing clothes that had been dried using the dryer sheet, the consumer had an adverse reaction. She stated that there was a burning red hot itchy rash on her chest and stomach. She also was sick to her stomach and had diarrhea. The consumer had to go to her doctor, who prescribed steroids
(08/21/2020) The consumer was using the product to spray wrinkles out of her clothes. The mist from the spray got on her arms and caused a hot itchy rash. The consumer reported a rash problem previously with a Bounce product that required a doctor visit. The consumer had to go back to the doctor. A strong cream and steroids were prescribed for the rash. As stated in the previous report, the consumer had never used the Bounce brand before.
12/2011 The caller stated that she used the fabric freshener to spray on her bed linen. She stated that she started to have health symptoms including, headaches, dizziness, respitarory problems, etc. She was taken to the Nazareth hospital in PA by the rescue squad for a heart attack, where she was hospitalized for a week. There was no diagnostic that she had a heart attack and she was released. 2/2012 The caller had a followup visit with her cardialogist and he was unable to diagnose the problem. 6/2012 The caller was still experiencing problems. She removed her bed linen, washed them thoroughly and threw out her pillows which seemed to resolve the issue. The manufacturer was not contacted because there was no contact number. The caller feels that this fabric freshener contains chemicals which is a health hazard. UPDATE: In November 2011 after moving to this current address, I began using Power House Fabric Freshener on my bed. I have a rather unstable bladder so I was concerned about smelling up the bedroom. I sprayed a lot and often. Toward the end of December, I began waking up light headed, unsteady on my feet, short of breath, and generally out of focus. These problems worsened during January and the 'out of focus' often lasted most of the day. February 5, 2012 my breathing became very labored and the chest felt tight and heavy. I was rushed to the hospital with a possible heart attack. After a week in the hospital and many tests, no heart attack. Shortly after returning home the syptoms returned, and I returned to spraying. In mid-April, my daughter (a nurse) wondered if my problems were caused by a concentration of carbon monoxide. Possible, we'd gone through a winter, windows closed, drapes down, low ceiling. So monitors were bought, and someone to check the house. No carbon monoxide. However my daughter's words resonated with me. They only thing going on in the bedroom besides sleeping and dressing, was spra
My wife reported to me that our clothes dryer was no longer heating. When I investigated, I found that a fabric softener sheet had glued itself to the exhaust vent inside the drum, impeding airflow. I was able to verify with a multimeter that the thermal fuse on the heating coil had tripped. So in summary, fabric softener sheets seem to have nearly caused a fire and it was likely only prevented by the safety mechanisms of the clothes dryer.
I used Febreze Fabric Refresher, the variety called "Free/Nature," in a spray bottle to clear the odor from a smelly co-worker (!!) after he left my office. I bought it specifically because of this person, who is a smoker. I sprayed it where he had been sitting and walking, then turned on a small fan and stepped out of the office for about 5 min. Came back, turned off the fan, and went back to work at my computer. Within an hour I noticed that my face was feeling numb under my right nostril. I took some [ibuprofen] in case it was a fever blister emerging, but the numbness spread to underneath the left nostril. I tested myself for stroke and assured myself that wasn't happening. About an hour later, my entire upper lip was swollen, and I felt as if my nasal passages were becoming swollen, so I went to the emergency room (St. Anthony Healthplex North in Oklahoma City). They too evaluated me to rule out stroke, then concluded it was an allergic reaction, gave me some prednisone and a prescription for that steroid and recommended antihistamines. The Febreze is the *only* change in my use of consumer products in recent weeks, and this incident was the first time I ever used it. I can provide a photo of my lip, which was swollen 3x the normal size the morning after the exposure. The swelling and pain began to resolve after more steroids and about 24 hours after the onset of numbness and swelling.
Showing 8 of 60 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to fabric treatment products on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are fabric treatment products?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, fabric treatment products have a danger score of 31/100 (low risk). An estimated 2,222 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from fabric treatment products?
The most common injury is derma/conjunct to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 6,862 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from fabric treatment products increasing or decreasing?
Down 28% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for fabric treatment products injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 11,838 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by fabric treatment products?
Of all ER visits involving fabric treatment products, approximately 1.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (98.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with fabric treatment products?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 31/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 0-4 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.