Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Fireplace Equipment ranks #622 of 838 by danger score (31/100) at ER-volume #494 of 838 (1,286/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #622
- danger rank of 838
- #494
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 31/100
- danger score
- 1,286/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (31/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
31 Lower than most lower than 74% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 42/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 6 | 50th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 1,286 | 37th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -38% | 13th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 19 | 55th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 25,733 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 663. Segments sum to 25,733 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Furnishings & Fixtures group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Furnishings & Fixtures danger scores
How this 31/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for fireplace equipment - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 1,286 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 5.8% Above median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-38%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for fireplace equipment are declining by about 38% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2010 (1,990 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2023 (573 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is burns, thermal to the hand, accounting for approximately 3,522 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the face (1,686 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 7,488 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 5.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 19 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how fireplace equipment fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 4,422 | 3,066 | |
| 5-14 | 2,811 | 1,297 | |
| 15-24 | 1,077 | 690 | |
| 25-34 | 1,057 | 960 | |
| 35-44 | 1,589 | 864 | |
| 45-54 | 872 | 1,207 | |
| 55-64 | 956 | 1,255 | |
| 65-74 | 1,089 | 830 | |
| 75+ | 824 | 862 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Hand | Burns, Thermal | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Finger | Burns, Thermal | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Foot | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Foot | Laceration | |
| Toe | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Arm | Burns, Thermal | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Toe | Fracture |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
78YOF C/O LACERATION LEFT HAND, ATTACKED BY HER 11-YEAR-OLD GRANDSON, HE WAS POKING A CLOSE WINDOW WITH A METAL POKER THAT HE WAS USING HIT THE PATIENT ON HER LEFT HAND. DX: LACERATION LEFT HAND
68 YOF HAD A DECORATIVE LOG FALL ON L FOOT A COUPLE OF HOURS AGO AT HOME. DX: FOOT CONTUSION, CLOSED FRACTURE OF FIFTH TOE OF L FOOT.
70YOF C/O HEAD INJURY, SHE TRIPPED OVER A METAL FIREPLACE GRATE AND FELL HEAD FIRST INTO A WALL. DX;ABRASION OF HEAD.
11 YOF FELL ON FIREPLACE AT HOME AND INJURED ELBOW DX CONTUSION ELBOW
5YOM MOM REPORTS PT RUNNING BY A GRATE AND SCRAPED THE SIDE OF THE NECK. DX: ABRASION OF NECK
28YOM, C/O BILATERAL ANKLE PAIN, POSSIBLY BITTEN BY SNAKE, GETTING FIREWOOD, SEVERE BURNING IN ACHILLES TENDON, SWELLING & REDNESS DX: BILATERAL ANKLE PAIN
25YOM TRIPPED OVER A GRATE AND FELL INJURING HIS ANKLE DX LT ANKLE PAIN
18YOF WAS THE RESTRAINED DRIVER THAT LOST CONTROL AND CRASHED INTO A FIRE HYDRANT, AIRBAGS DEPLOYED DX: CONTUSION RIGHT HAND, CONTUSION RIGHT FOREARM
38YOM STEPPED THROUGH A BROKEN PART OF A METAL GRATE AND INJURIED HIS KNEE DX: LT KNEE ABRASION
4YOM HAS HISTORY OF B CELL LYMPHOMA AND IS OFF CHEMO. HE FELL ON HIS KNEE ON A GRATE AT THE TRAIN STATION. DX: ACUTE PAIN OF LEFT KNEE, LEFT KNEE INJURY, B CELL LYMPHOMA IN REMISSION
6YOM TRIPPED AND FELL AGAINST FIREPLACE SCREEN. DX: BURN, HAND
14 MOM PRESENTS WITH HEAD INJURY S/P A FIREPLACE GRATE FELL ON HIS HEAD. DX: HEAD INJURY
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
My family was using an enviro-log fire log in the fire pit on our patio. The firelog exploded, sending red hot embers and debris up to an 8 foot radius from the fire pit. Some of the concrete in our fire pit also broke off and shot pieces/debris out of the fire pit. Multiple burning embers landed on our patio furniture and melted the fabric/burned holes. One hole was from a large ember and it is deep enough and wide enough to fit a baseball inside the hole. One adult sustained a very small burn on his back from one of the embers. Some embers landed in the grass but the ground was wet so luckily they did not start a fire.
Text of submitter's message dated July 24, 2014: On 4\4\13 I purchased a purchased a set of gas free logs from Lowe's Home Centers. They seem to be working fine. This set has a hoarse shoe set base. Example when turning the unit on the process of the flames ignitions first and tallest flame lights in back 2nd a smaller flame lights in the middle 3rd and smallest flame lights in the front. We had trouble with the progression. I contacted the manufacture Procom 2800 Griffin Dr. Bowling Green KT 42101 Phone number 877 866 5989. I was told by a technician that my propane company had said the outside propane tank too low. I contacted Americas 1573 Til co Dr Suite 2 Frederick MD 21704 ............ [REDACTED] They had a tech come out and ste the pressure at 13 (which is not the pressure that come into the unit). Still the logs would not work properly. I called and spoke with several techs with procpom. [REDACTED] and many others and the responses to my concern blase. Now it is November I am working at home (the logs were on) when I started feeling strange. I went up stairs and the smell of GAS WAS VERY STRONG. I did not touch any electrical devices. I went across the street from my home and called 911 for the fire dept. I also called my propane company Amerigas. They both arrived promptly. The fired dept refused my entry into my home to high levels of propane gas. They open and every window and door and brought in industrial fans to blow out the fumes. Both the fire dept and Amerigas agreed that this was brought on by the gas logs and it could have ended tragically. The next several days I called procom and left many messages in regards to this matter. No one returned my call. Phoning again I actually was able to speak to a human [REDACTED]. I explained the entire story he was very sympathetic and said he would get this off to the "legal dept". Then phone calls were never returned. If I happened get a voice mail the call was never returned. I called again and got [REDA
Consumer stated that his fireplace lighter has no safety mechanism. The consumer stated that the lighter functions like a normal cigarette lighter with the exception of a long 8 inch tube where the flame comes out of. The consumer stated that this product has no safety mechanism to prevent children from using the product, though the packaging claims it has a "safety trigger". The consumer opened the packaging of the product and noticed the issue right away. The lighter is operated by fuel and the consumer was not hurt by the product. The consumer has yet to call the manufacturer or the retailer about the issue. The product has not caused any damage to the consumer's home nor appear to show any signs of damage.
I bought a bug blocker on Amazon ASIN B0CXWNXRVK sold by [REDACTED]. It was manufactured in China. When it came it was saturated with an oily substance that smelled like sewage. There was no instructions and no indication of what chemical or pesticide it was saturated with. It caused irritation to the skin on my hands.
I received a Weber Rapidfire chimney starter as a birthday gift and I was putting it away when I lacerated my finger on the razor sharp edge of the heat shield. The edge of the metal has an edge that was not dulled after it was machined, cut, or punched and it is, obviously, exposed. It took about half an hour to get the bleeding to slow down enough to bandage it. I was a volunteer emergency medical technician and I know how to stop bleeding.
I own Lennox direct vent elite series gas log edv4540cpm-b since March 2005. Ever since we have owned this gas log, as soon as we have a quick power outage, the log comes on. After this happens I unplug the fireplace and start the log with the control panel until I get a certified rep to fix an issue. We had it looked at again earlier this year. Obviously the problem has not been solved, so I have unplugged the fireplace.
gas logs self start/ignited ....nobody home, no human intervention, ran unattended for over 10 hours with glass doors closed, fortunately the only damage was the marble surround cracked. I contacted home depot, only to get a reply that they shoe no record of my purchase, I DO HAVE MY RECEIPT.
The consumer stated that she was using the fire log with her chimney. The consumer stated that she lit the fire log. The consumer stated that after 10-15 minutes the chimney was red hot. The consumer has a chimney thermometer. The consumer stated that the temperature was past the highest setting (900F). The consumer took the fire log outside and poured water over it. The consumer stated that not much of the fire log was used up. The consumer stated that some of the paint is burnt off of the chimney. The consumer stated that her chimney was just cleaned in fall. The consumer contacted the retailer regarding the incident. The retailer e-mailed the manf on consumer's behalf. The manf called the consumer. The consumer was informed by the manf that they did not have any other complaints with this product. The consumer stated that if she did not notice the incident, more damage could have occurred.
Showing 8 of 19 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to fireplace equipment on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Furnishings & Fixtures
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Fireplace Equipment: cross-group products nearest on danger score (31/100), estimated annual ER visits (1,286/yr), and hospitalization share (5.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
- Wire, Not Specified Home Communication & Entertainment 5.8%admitted
- Cabinet Or Door Hardware Building Materials & Home Structures 5.8%admitted
- Squash, Racquet Ball Or Paddle Ball Sports Protective Equipment & Gear 5.7%admitted
- Unicycles, Unpowered Or Unspecified Sports & Recreation Equipment 5.8%admitted
Related Products in Home Furnishings & Fixtures
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Fireplace Equipment ranks #622 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #494 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does fireplace equipment rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, fireplace equipment ranks #622 by PlainSafety danger score (31/100) and #494 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (1,286/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from fireplace equipment?
The most common injury is burns, thermal to the hand, accounting for approximately 3,522 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from fireplace equipment increasing or decreasing?
Down 38% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for fireplace equipment injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 7,488 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by fireplace equipment?
Of all ER visits involving fireplace equipment, approximately 5.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (94.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with fireplace equipment?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.