Nonwheeled Riding Toys, Unpowered
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Toys & Children's Recreation · CPSC Code 1327
Down 21% over 5 years
The verdict
Nonwheeled Riding Toys, Unpowered carry a danger score of 32/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 2,171 ER-treated injuries a year that are declining by about 21% over the last five years.
- 32/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 2,171
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 2.6%
- end in hospital admission
- 0-4
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 1327 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 32/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume2,171 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)2.6%
- Fatality rate0.00%
- 5-year trend-21%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Nonwheeled Riding Toys, Unpowered (CPSC product code 1327, in the Toys & Children's Recreation category) generate an estimated 2,171 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 43,422 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 32/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are declining by about 21% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2011 (2,893 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2019 (1,177 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 6,429 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by internal injury to the head (6,349 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 29,404 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 27 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 14,873 | 14,492 | |
| 5-14 | 5,511 | 5,204 | |
| 15-24 | 304 | 524 | |
| 25-34 | 76 | 896 | |
| 35-44 | 0 | 371 | |
| 45-54 | 0 | 140 | |
| 55-64 | 157 | 328 | |
| 65-74 | 18 | 133 | |
| 75+ | 0 | 348 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Mouth | Laceration | |
| Lower Arm | Fracture | |
| Elbow | Fracture | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Elbow | Dislocation | |
| Head | Concussion | |
| Wrist | Fracture | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Foot | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
35 YOF WAS INJURED AFTER FELL OFF AN BOUNCY BALL HIT SHOULDER ON WALL DX: PAIN
5YOM FELL OFF A BOUNCY BALL THE NIGHT PRIOR AND WOKE UP ON THE HOUR CRYING IN PAIN DX: LEFT WITHOUT BEING SEEN
4YOF WAS PLAYING ON A BOUNCY BALL AND FELL OFF CAUSING PAIN TO HER LOW BACK, LEFT LEG AND RIGHT ARM DX: MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
9 YOM WITH LEFT TESTICULAR PAIN. THEY WERE AT *** ~ 5 DAYS PTA AND RIDING A ROCKING HORSE WHEN HE JUMPED OFF AND INJURED HIMSELF. DX PAIN LEFT TESTICLE
3YOF WAS PLAYING ON A BOUNCY BALL AND FELL FORWARD STRIKING CHIN ON THE FLOOR DX: CHIN LACERATION
6YOM WITH LAC TO SCALP AFTER PT FELL FROM BOUNCE BALL AND HIT THE WOODEN BEAM WITH METAL EDGE. DX: LAC OF SCALP
8YOM FELL OFF A RIDING TOY BOUNCY BALL AT CHURCH. DX: CONCUSSION
21MOF TRIPPED OVER A BOUNCY BALL STRIKING HEAD ON A ROCK DX: LACERATION TO SCALP
3YOF FELL BACKWARDS OFF OF BOUNCY BALL WITH 2 MINS OF CONFUSION AND LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS. DX: INJURY OF HEAD
2YOM WAS ON A BOUNCY BALL WHEN HE FELL AND HIT HEAD ON A WOODEN FLOOR DX: CONTUSION TO SCALP
11YOM WAS SITTING ON A BOUNCY BALL AND BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE LEG PAIN DX: RIGHT LEG PAIN *
3YOM PLAYING WITH WOODEN RIDING HORSE AND HIT HIMSELF IN PENIS DX: CONTUSION PENIS
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
On 03/27/13 the consumer's daughter got on the seat of the toy and was moving back and forth. The consumer states the toy has purple plastic restraints which snap in the front that were closed while her daughter was sitting on the toy. After approximately 5 minutes the consumer saw her daughter fall on the ground. The consumer noticed the purple restraints were open. She picked up her daughter from the ground. The consumer states her daughter was crying loud. She noticed a bruise on her daughter's left shoulder and had scrapes on her face. The incident occurred outside of the consumer's home where she lived at the time. An hour after the incident occurred the consumer tried to pick up her daughter by grabbing her daughter's arms and her daughter immediately started crying. The consumer checked her daughter's left arm and noticed the bruise on her shoulder looked worse. The consumer states it looked like a bone was popping out. The consumer took her daughter to the ER at Methodist Hospital [REDACTED] located in [REDACTED]. A doctor took X-rays of the shoulder and advised the consumer that her daughter's collar bone broke in half. The doctor wrapped the child's left shoulder and put the child's arm in a sling. The doctor prescribed the child pain medication. The child was released the same day. The consumer does not recall the doctor's name who examined her daughter. The consumer contacted her daughter's physician and the physician recommended the child to go to a specialist, Dr.[REDACTED]. Dr. [REDACTED] examined the child's shoulder and advised the consumer her daughter's collar bone was broken in half. Dr.[REDACTED] put a cast on the child's shoulder. The consumer's daughter wore the cast for approximately 6 weeks. Approximately a week after the incident the consumer contacted the retail store where she purchased the toy and advised them of the incident. The retail store provided the consumer with the manufacturer's contact information. The
(7/23/2012) The consumer was passing through a toy store and near the checkout line there was a bouncy horse. He placed his 16 month old daughter on the display horse. Within 3 seconds of the child being on the horse she bounced backwards and then forward. As she was going forward the child and the horse hit the ground head first. The consumer immediately picked up his child and noticed a red mark on the center of her forehead. The consumer tried to file an accident report with a representative in the store, but she advised him that kids fall off of the horse all the time. The retailers rep. proceeded to contact her supervisor [REDACTED] (last name unknown). The consumer spoke with [REDACTED], who told him that they would take the item off the floor and scheduled an appointment to meet with the consumer when he returns to store. The consumer has not taken his child to the emergency room, but will continue to watch her throughout the day. NOTE: The consumer did not purchase this product, so it remained at the store.
I have purchased the 22" Plush Rocking Chair Rhino by Hugfun from Costco. The toy is really unbalanced and easily tilts backwards and causes the rider to fall back. The toy falls on the rider. My daughter and her friends repeatedly fell backwards. At first I thought that they just don't know how to ride it but every single one had the same issue, repeatedly. It is dangerous not only for infants and toddlers but also older pre-school kids.
This caller is reporting a Sit and Spin purchased around June 20 2016 from her nephew. The model# unknown (caller isn't where the product is located at this time) _ 18 mos+. May 2nd 2017 the caller's daughter who is 2 1/2 was climbing on to it when it spun from under her causing her to fall and twist her leg. Her mother (the caller) took her to Kaiser South where she was diagnosed as having a spiral fracture of the right leg calf (the fracture wraps around her leg). She contacted the manufacturer who advised her that she would receive a prepaid shipping kit, toys for the baby and 24.99 to reimburse the caller
This item tips over backwards when a child is rocking resulting in a head injury!!! Please research this brand of rocker and RECALL the item!! Check Amazon reviews and you will find a lot of parents complaining about this rocker. After my daughter and her friend tipped backwards from lightly rocking when they were 2 years old, I pulled this item from the playroom. It is VERY DANGEROUS!
i recently purchased an animal rocking toy made by Rockabye. A sample of these toys can be found at http://www.rockabye.com/products-page/Rockers/ While hosting an easter egg hunt for about 20 children I noticed some of the younger children (under age of 2) were starting to play on the rocker. Within 2 mins the first child rocked back, and the rocker continued backwards flinging the child on his head. Since this was on plush carpet there was no injury. Chalking it up to an agressive child we left the rocker. Within 5 mins my niece (age 18mos.) mounted the rocker and the same thing happened to her. We immediately pulled the rocker from the party. I tried contacting Rockabye to inform them and my email went ignored. This morning my daughter (age 15mos.) snuck on to the rocker, and this time went back on her head on a hard-wood floor. For the 2nd time I wrote into Rockabye notifying them of the issue....additionally I reported it to the retailer who immediately refunded my money. This is a very dangerous product with an obvious design flaw that will undoubtedly injure kids using it. Hopefully you can take action to prevent further incidents.
My 20 month old has the Rockabye (Rock a Bye) duck. She just started getting comfortable with the rocker in the past week or so. She got on it this morning and within 5 rocks, flipped over the front, slamming her head to the floor. I have seen that the company claims they have verbiage on the packaging of their product that says the product will flip if rocked on aggressively. The issue I see is that this is clearly a toy marketed to very young children and toddlers who obviously do not have the self-control to contain their rocking. This is not a safe toy.
Grand Child was playing on Lulu Ladybug Rocker sold by Rock-A-Bye. She is a petite 2yrs old at an approximate weight of 36lbs. Rocker stated it was designed for up to 80lbs. She was play and enjoying the rocker when it flipped forward on her landing her a face plant then the rocker slammed into her head has it completely flipped upside down. This was a new toy and had not been played with. She received it for Christmas 2013 and rocker remained in closet until her visit with me at the first of April 2015. She just turned 2 yrs old. This rocker is unsafe and should be recalled.
Showing 8 of 27 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered have a danger score of 32/100 (low risk). An estimated 2,171 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered?
The most common injury is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 6,429 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered increasing or decreasing?
Down 21% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 29,404 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered?
Of all ER visits involving nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered, approximately 2.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.4%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with nonwheeled riding toys, unpowered?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Toys & Children's Recreation
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 32/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 0-4 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.