32
CPSC NEISS Data 2005–2024

Electric Can Openers

Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.

Kitchen Cooking Appliances · CPSC Code 213

Up 84% over 5 years

The verdict

Electric Can Openers carry a danger score of 32/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 118 ER-treated injuries a year that are rising by about 84% over the last five years.

32/100
danger score (low risk)
118
ER visits per year (avg)
0.6%
end in hospital admission
0-4
most-injured age group

Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 213 - last data year 2024.

PlainSafety danger score

0/100100/10032/100
PlainSafety danger score

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 32/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for electric can openers - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume118 ER visits/yr
  • Severity (hospitalization rate)0.6%
  • Fatality rate0.00%
  • 5-year trend+84%

See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Electric Can Openers (CPSC product code 213, in the Kitchen Cooking Appliances category) generate an estimated 118 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 2,131 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 32/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are rising by about 84% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2020 (313 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2016 (16 estimated visits).

The single most common ER diagnosis for electric can openers is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,062 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the hand (404 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 448 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 0.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 52 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how electric can openers fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

118
Injuries / Year
0.6%
Hospitalization Rate
0.00%
Fatality Rate

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

0100200300400 2005200820112014201720212024 62
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Electric Can Openers, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 228 220 448
5-14 0 152 152
15-24 15 71 86
25-34 18 313 331
35-44 162 143 305
45-54 110 181 291
55-64 17 148 165
65-74 78 101 179
75+ 34 141 175

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 1,062
Hand Laceration 404
Finger Other 113
Finger Amputation 98
Lower Arm Laceration 80
Upper Trunk Fracture 78
Finger Contusions, Abr. 74
Toe Contusions, Abr. 72
Face Laceration 70
Foot Laceration 19
Shoulder Strain, Sprain 16
Upper Trunk Other 16
Wrist Laceration 16
Head Internal Injury 6
Head Laceration 6

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 95.3% (2,029)
Left Without Being Seen 4.0% (86)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 0.7% (15)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 77 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

77YOF LACERATIONS TO 2ND, 3RD, AND 4TH FINGERS WHILE USING ELECTRIC CAN OPENER AT HOME, DX: LACERATION

Age 2 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

2 YOF PRESENTS WITH FINGER LACERATION S/P ACCIDENTALLY CUT FINGER ON AN ELECTRIC CAN OPENER AT HOME. DX: FINGER LACERATION

Age 77 · Female · Foot · Laceration · 2022

77 YOF HAD A CAN OPENER FALL ON HER FOOT. DX: LEFT FOOT LACERATION.

Age 220 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2022

20MOF REACHED UP TO THE COUNTER AND CUT FINGER ON ELECTRIC CAN OPENER DX LACERATION OF FINGER

Age 73 · Female · Finger · Contusions, Abr. · 2021

73YOF TO ER FOR LACERATION & CONTUSTION OF LEFT THUMB, PT CUT LEFT THUMB ON ELECTRIC CAN OPENER WHEN REACHED INTO CABINET AT HOME DX CONTUSION LEFT THUMB, LACERATION LEFT THUMB W/O FOREIGN BODY

Age 30 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2021

30YOF PT WAS USING AN ELECTRIC CAN OPENER WHEN SHE CAUGHT HER PINKY FINGER. DX: FINGER LACERATION.

Age 2 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2021

2 YOF CUT FINGER ON BLADE OF ELECTRIC CAN OPENER DX: LAC RT INDEX FINGER

Age 28 · Female · Finger · Other · 2021

28YOF PRESENTS WITH LT 4TH DIGIT FINGER PAIN AFTERT GETTING HER FINGER STUICK IN AN ELECTRIC CAN OPENER. DX: LT RING FINGER PAIN

Age 45 · Male · Finger · Other · 2021

45YOM DEVELOPED INFECTION AFTER LAC FINGER USING ELECTRIC CAN OPENER, DX: FINGER INFECTION & FINGER LAC

Age 75 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2020

75YOF PT STATES SUSTAINED CUTS FROM THUMB FROM A ELECTRIC CAN OPENER AT HOMEDX LACERATION TO RIGHT THUMB

Age 2 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2020

2YOF MOTHER STATES CHILD TOUCHED THE SHARP/BLADE OF AN ELECTRIC CAN OPENER AT HOMEDX LACERATION LEFT MIDDLE FINGER

Age 31 · Female · Hand · Laceration · 2020

31YOF WAS OPENING UP A CAN WITH AN ELECTRIC CAN OPENER AND CAUGHT HER RIGHT HAND DX: LACERATION TO HAND

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/4/2012 · Incident, No Injury · Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. · South Carolina

Some time after purchasing the Hamilton Beach model76606 electric can opener (over a year) it started to require more than one turn around a can and now will not open a can at all. Also, as it was failing to cut it would track differently on multiple turns and shave off fine metal turnings that clung to the can and the opener mechanism. The metal shavings are at great risk of getting into the food and since the can be very fine could be ingested without the consumers knowledge. I can attest to their ability to puncture flesh since I got a sliver in my finger as I was disassembling the unit to discover what the problem was. I discovered that the cutting wheel edge was completely worn down. In my opinion it was not properly tempered to stand up to normal household service for any reasonable length of time.

9/3/2024 · Incident, No Injury · Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. · California

I bought a new Hamilton Beach electric can opener (Abrelatas Smooth Touch) and tried to open a can. In the process of opening the can, it created some long slivers of metal, very thin, almost couldn't see them. If they got in my food I could choke to death - that metal sliver would cut a persons throat up.

9/28/2022 · Incident, No Injury · CONAIR CORPORATION · Pennsylvania

The Quisinart electric can opener I bought for $58.00 leaves a wirelike shaving in the food when opening the can

9/13/2017 · Incident, No Injury · HARVEST DIRECT · United States

We bought a Tornado battery operated can opener and opened a bunch of cans. The can opener created super thin sharp needle like shards about an inch long and we feared the shards might come off in the contents as they are poured out. Walmart sells the item as well as direct tv marketing.

9/11/2013 · Incident, No Injury · Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. · Tennessee

The caller stated that the electric can opener cuts on the outside of can which leaves shreds of metal which falls from the cutter into the content of the can. She is concerned that this is a safety hazard and should be reported. The manufacturer was not contacted as yet. The product is not included in a recall.

9/1/2017 · Incident, No Injury · Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. · Arizona

Can opener does not open can on first rotation. Multiple rotations produces metal shavings. These cans must be discarded. The cutting wheel is worn and needs to be replaced. Hamilton Beach was contacted and said the wheel cannot be replaced on this model. It can be replaced with the removal of 6 cover screws and one set screw for the cutting wheel and remove the drive capstan. After calling Hamilton Beach 800-851-8900. I was told the cutting wheel was not replaceable and it was not repairable. I was given a code for a 40% discount on their web site. They would add $11.49 for shipping. This brings the total to around $33. This product is $28 at Walmart. https://www.walmart.com/ip/Hamilton-Beach-Smooth-Touch-Can-Opener-Model-76606/5924593 Making the discount useless. It a shame that they will not sell new cutting wheels. It make this product disposable. Users that do not see the metal shaving could be in trouble.

8/18/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. · California

I bought a Hamilton beach can opener from "Amazon top choice" 3 year's ago. When u open a can it leaves metal shavings. Just want to let u know. I contacted Amazon to no avail and Hamilton beach no answer yet. I included pictures and videos. Please recall this product. Ty

7/28/2017 · Incident, No Injury · E MISHAN & SONS (use EMSON INC/E MISHAN & SONS) · Florida

Caller is reporting that while using the device to remove the cover from a glass jar it snapped off becoming a projectile which hit his grandson in his stomach. He stated that the child was not injured but it could have hit him in the face. He stated that he had only used it twice before the incident. Caller contacted the company and they advised him to take pictures of the device and submit it for a claim, he was offered a replacement but he declined due to the safety hazard.

Showing 8 of 52 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to electric can openers on the CPSC website.

Frequently Asked Questions

How dangerous are electric can openers?

Based on 20 years of CPSC data, electric can openers have a danger score of 32/100 (low risk). An estimated 118 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.

What are the most common injuries from electric can openers?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,062 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from electric can openers increasing or decreasing?

Up 84% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for electric can openers injuries?

The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 448 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by electric can openers?

Of all ER visits involving electric can openers, approximately 0.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (99.4%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with electric can openers?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Safety Guides

What this means for you

Treat the 32/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.

  • See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
  • Injuries cluster in the 0-4 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
  • Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls

NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.

Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.